Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A volume-filling field changes ideal-gas pressure

Physical scope

A classical ideal positional gas in dimension d at least two with a constant per-particle external energy throughout the volume; a nonzero shift cannot be represented by a uniformly tempered exterior, while the zero shift agrees with the empty exterior. No empirical observation is asserted.

Example

For the ideal positional gas φ=0 in dimension d≥2 and a bounded measurable region of dimensionless volume 0≤V<∞, take z>0 and T>0, with β=(kBT)−1>0 in J−1. The grand partition is ΞV(z,β)=ezV. Now impose a constant external energy c∈R joules per particle at every point of the volume, adding cN to the configuration energy and using the same grand weighting convention. The new grand partition is ΞV(c)=eze−βcV. For V>0, the dimensionless per-volume log-partition rate changes from z to ze−βc when c≠0. At V=0, both partitions are 1 and no per-volume rate is assigned. For c≠0, this energy shift cannot be represented on the nonempty cubes Λn by the deterministic exterior interaction used by Qualified van Hove and tempered-exterior thermodynamic limits. For c=0, it vanishes and agrees with the empty exterior ∅∈Ω(0) of Van Hove regions and uniformly tempered exterior preparations. For every c, the ideal potential itself fails the cited theorem's stronger interaction hypotheses.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Stable regularly tempered classical positional preparation: V is dimensionless reference volume, β is inverse energy, and the ideal model has HN=0.

[A1]

Finite-volume equilibrium ensemble sampling: ΞV=∑N≥0zNZV,N with the indistinguishable positional factor 1/N!.

[F2]

Van Hove regions and uniformly tempered exterior preparations: the deterministic exterior class Ω(t) has one fixed square-count bound t≥0, and Wn(ω,ζ)=∑x∈ω∑y∈ζ∖Λnφ(x−y). Thus ∅∈Ω(0) and, for the ideal potential φ=0, Wn=0 for every allowed exterior.

[L1]

Qualified van Hove and tempered-exterior thermodynamic limits: its current conditional statement treats exterior energy only as Wn(ω,ζ) for a fixed ζ∈Ω(t) and assumes a superstable regular pair potential with an additional positive divergent core for the exterior conclusion. The ideal potential has no such positive core. The theorem is draft and remains conditional on its mathematical suppliers.

Verification

Given: The finite-volume grand weight, an ideal gas, and the uniform per-particle shift c over the entire region.

1.1givenF1A1algebra

Since HN=0, the finite-volume canonical positional integral is ZV,N=VN/N!. Summing the adopted grand weights gives ΞV=∑N≥0(zV)N/N!=ezV.

2.1givenA1step 1.1algebra

Adding cN to the energy multiplies the N-particle weight by e−βcN, so ΞV(c)=∑N≥0(ze−βcV)N/N!=eze−βcV. When V>0, division of the two logarithms by V gives z and ze−βc; these differ for c≠0 because β>0 and z>0. When V=0, only the vacuum contributes, both partitions equal 1, and division by V is undefined.

3.1givenF2L1step 2.1∎

For φ=0, [F2] gives Wn(ω,ζ)=0 for every allowed exterior. If c≠0, a singleton ω={x} in any Λn has cN=c≠0, so no such exterior represents this energy shift. If c=0, the shift is zero and agrees with ζ=∅∈Ω(0). In either case the ideal potential lacks the positive divergent core required by [L1], so the calculation in step 2.1 contradicts no qualified exterior conclusion.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels