How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Electric circulation obstructs a global charged equilibrium scalar
Example
Let and let , where . Let be the smooth global closed one-form on induced by on its universal cover, normalized by . Give the flat product metric and time orientation . Then is a future timelike Killing field with . For a nonzero constant in tesla, define the global potential and field For a charged massive species with , take constant and . Although is exact and stationary, no smooth single-valued scalar makes stationary under the charged Liouville transport of Charged particle and Liouville data on a stationary Lorentzian domain.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The product Lorentzian manifold, its smooth global one-form , metric, Killing field, potential , field , and constants , , , and in the Example.
Charged particle and Liouville data on a stationary Lorentzian domain: for any smooth scalar and smooth vector field , is the charged exponential ansatz on the future massive shell.
Global electrochemical redshift from charged Liouville stationarity: without assuming a global potential compensator, is stationary on the entire future massive shell if and only if is Killing and .
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): every sequence of nonempty sets has a choice function. This is inherited from the actual draft smooth tangent-bundle data; no stronger choice principle is used in this example.
is connected, is future timelike Killing, and its lapse is .
is global, , , and .
Verification
Given: [A1], [A2], [F1], and the theorem's local stationarity criterion [F2].
The product metric is smooth, has signature , and is invariant under translations of ; hence is a future timelike Killing field and . The form is globally defined, closed, and independent of , so is a global one-form and differentiation gives . Since and , the product rule gives ; direct contraction gives .
The product rule gives , whose period around the circle is . Every exact one-form for a global smooth real has zero integral around this closed circle, since its line integral is the endpoint difference of . Thus no global satisfies . Under a gauge change , the coordinate formula gives ; this is exact and has zero circle period. Hence the nonzero period cannot be removed by a single-valued gauge.
Here is Killing. If a global smooth made from [F1] stationary, [F2] would give Integrating around the positive circle gives , which contradicts and . Hence no single-valued global exists.
Remarks
This example has a global potential and exact field strength, but the contraction is closed with nonzero period and is not exact. The obstruction is global topology, not a singular gauge. If or , the displayed period vanishes and this example gives no obstruction.