How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Quantitative switched coefficient and inertial rate
Example
Assume the conditional mathematical spectra and switched-coefficient bound of Exact defined Markov thermometer and switched coefficient bound, with , , and a real nonzero . For each proper switching duration and excitation frequency , define the normalized accelerated coefficient With the exact leading-coefficient estimate is For the inertial covariance, the same definition gives because for and . Thus the inertial excitation coefficient divided by duration tends to zero, while the accelerated one tends to its conditional spectrum. These are finite-switch coefficient statements; they do not claim an all-order detector probability, strict nonzero response for every finite switch, or a measured outcome.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The exact switch is nonzero, is a proper duration in seconds, is an angular frequency in seconds, and the conditional accelerated and inertial spectra from the A-page items.
Exact defined Markov thermometer and switched coefficient bound defines and , proves the error estimate for both stationary spectra, and gives . Its accelerated spectrum remains conditional on the two present but unaccepted batch-74 draft suppliers recorded there.
Proof
Apply the A-page estimate from [F1] to . It gives the displayed accelerated error bound for every ; since the right side tends to zero, conditionally on the same supplier.
For , [F1] gives the same bound with . Since , . Its spectral integral for is nonnegative because and the other factor is a squared modulus. The Lipschitz constant of is , so the normalized coefficient lies between zero and and tends to zero. This is an exact mathematical model comparison, not a pointwise detector or empirical claim.