How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact defined Markov thermometer and switched coefficient bound
Statement
Assume Countable Choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (). Use the massless accelerated
covariance and its conditional spectrum from
Constructed timelike smear and massless accelerated spectrum, with in metres per second
squared, in metres per second, and angular frequency in seconds.
The conditional detailed-balance input is the actual Statement of the
current batch-74 draft Single-pole thermal contour and exact detailed balance, reproduced in
[L1] below. Its declared prerequisite Positive chiral current and exponential test-coordinate model is also
a draft. The current run's Step-1 records report ready for both items;
these are authoring-readiness records, not proof acceptance. The inertial
pair is the unconditioned comparison from
Constructed timelike smear and massless accelerated spectrum. Both spectra are continuous and
globally Lipschitz. The conventions are with kernel
and paired bilinearly with Schwartz tests.
Let be nonzero, let the switching duration be measured in seconds, and put For either stationary pair or define the switched coefficient Then and, for every , so , and This proves the leading switched coefficient limit and its explicit error; it is not a convergence theorem for an all-order detector transition probability or an exact infinite-time probability.
There is also the following separately defined two-state continuous-time Markov model. Choose an energy in joules, in joule-seconds, in joules per kelvin, and a coupling in square metres per square second. For the accelerated spectrum set These are positive rates in seconds. Let be the probability of the excited state in the two-state chain with ground-to-excited rate and excited-to-ground rate , where model time is measured in seconds. For every and any initial probability , then If the effective thermometer temperature is defined by , then This is an exact result for the specified Markov chain. It is not a weak coupling or point-detector thermalization theorem.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; the exact Fourier and tempered-distribution conventions; the two covariance/spectrum pairs in the preceding item; and positive with the units stated in the Statement, and an initial excited-state probability .
Countable Choice is inherited from the Fourier suppliers and the draft thermal-contour supplier and its draft prerequisite. The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
In the separately specified two-state continuous-time Markov model, the state order is and probability distributions are row vectors. Its generator, with the transition rate from state to state for , is The row distribution evolves by the forward equation with ; this fixes the probability evolution meant by the chain in the Statement.
The accelerated covariance, its spectrum conditional on the contour supplier, and the inertial covariance and spectrum are stated in Constructed timelike smear and massless accelerated spectrum.
Draft supplier, not an accepted proof input: the actual batch-74 Statement of Single-pole thermal contour and exact detailed balance assumes its parameter with units of inverse length. Renaming that parameter to and its length variable to , it gives and , , and for . Its declared prerequisite Positive chiral current and exponential test-coordinate model is also present as a batch-74 draft. Both current run Step-1 records report ready; this is authoring-readiness evidence, not proof acceptance. All accelerated conclusions below remain conditional on those actual statements and proof review, not on their labels.
A tempered distribution is a continuous bilinear functional on Schwartz space, and its Fourier transform is defined by bilinear transposition with the negative-sign convention. Tempered distribution Fourier transform of a tempered distribution
Fourier transformation is an automorphism on tempered distributions, with inverse ; on Schwartz functions the normalization is the negative-sign transform. Fourier transform on tempered distributions is well defined and continuous Fourier transform is a topological automorphism of tempered distributions Fourier inversion on Schwartz space
The Fourier transform agrees with the integral transform on and with the Plancherel extension on ; that extension is a unitary isometry under the negative-sign convention. Fourier transform agrees with l one and plancherel transforms Plancherel theorem
Absolute Fubini applies to the compactly supported time integrals used to form the autocorrelation of . Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
consists of real smooth functions whose support is compact; these functions are Schwartz. Test function space d of an open set
Proof
Put and . Compact support [F6] and [F5] permit the change of variables and interchange of the two ordinary integrals. Setting and , and using the reality of , gives the negative-sign angular transform By [F2] and [F3], the inverse angular-frequency relation is in the distributional sense: it is the negative-sign inverse after the change . Pairing with gives the absolutely convergent formula Here has at most linear growth and is rapidly decreasing, so the integral is finite.
Since by [F6], each derivative of is obtained by transforming a compactly supported smooth function ; repeated integration by parts shows every such derivative decreases faster than any inverse power. Hence . Plancherel in [F4], followed by , yields Changing variables in 1.1 therefore gives
For , [F1] gives . On this is linear with slope , on it is zero, and for , . Thus its global Lipschitz constant is . For , the conditional formula in [F1] is smooth at zero by its Taylor expansion, has bounded derivative on every compact interval, has bounded derivative as by exponential decay. Its derivative is The Taylor expansion at zero makes this derivative finite there; as it decays exponentially times a polynomial, and as it tends . Thus it is bounded on both tails and on compact intervals, so both spectra are globally Lipschitz (the accelerated assertion is conditional on [L1]). Subtract in step 2.1 and use . The definition of gives the stated error bound and its limit.
The accelerated spectrum is positive: for numerator and denominator in [F1] are positive, for they are both negative, and the zero limit is positive. Thus . By [A2], the second component of gives . Solving this scalar linear ODE gives with . For seconds, this is a convex combination of and , so it remains a probability. Apply [L1] at to get , so . The ratio is therefore . Comparing with its defining Boltzmann form gives . This calculation concerns only the specified Markov model and its adopted rates.
Depends on
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Fourier transform of a tempered distribution
Tempered distribution
Test function space d of an open set
Fourier transform on tempered distributions is well defined and continuous
Fourier inversion on Schwartz space
Fourier transform agrees with l one and plancherel transforms
Plancherel theorem
Fourier transform is a topological automorphism of tempered distributions
Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
Single-pole thermal contour and exact detailed balance
Positive chiral current and exponential test-coordinate model
Constructed timelike smear and massless accelerated spectrum