Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact defined Markov thermometer and switched coefficient bound

Statement

Assume Countable Choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω). Use the massless accelerated covariance Ca and its conditional spectrum Sa from Constructed timelike smear and massless accelerated spectrum, with a>0 in metres per second squared, c>0 in metres per second, and angular frequency in seconds−1. The conditional detailed-balance input is the actual Statement of the current batch-74 draft Single-pole thermal contour and exact detailed balance, reproduced in [L1] below. Its declared prerequisite Positive chiral current and exponential test-coordinate model is also a draft. The current run's Step-1 records report ready for both items; these are authoring-readiness records, not proof acceptance. The inertial pair (C0,S0) is the unconditioned comparison from Constructed timelike smear and massless accelerated spectrum. Both spectra are continuous and globally Lipschitz. The conventions are S=F−C with kernel e−iνs and C paired bilinearly with Schwartz tests.

Let h∈Cc∞(R;R) be nonzero, let the switching duration T>0 be measured in seconds, and put h^(z)=∫Rh(u)e−izu du,Kh=12π∥h∥22∫R∣z∣ ∣h^(z)∣2 dz. For either stationary pair (C,S)=(Ca,Sa) or (C0,S0) define the switched coefficient RT(C)(ν)=⟨C(s),e−iνs∫Rh(t/T)h((t−s)/T) dt⟩. Then Kh<∞ and, for every ν∈R, RT(C)(ν)=T22π∫RS(ω)∣h^(T(ν−ω))∣2 dω, so RT(C)(ν)≥0, and ∣RT(C)(ν)T∥h∥22−S(ν)∣≤Lip⁡(S)KhT,Lip⁡(S)=sup⁡x≠y∣S(x)−S(y)∣∣x−y∣<∞. This proves the leading switched coefficient limit and its explicit error; it is not a convergence theorem for an all-order detector transition probability or an exact infinite-time probability.

There is also the following separately defined two-state continuous-time Markov model. Choose an energy E>0 in joules, ℏ>0 in joule-seconds, kB>0 in joules per kelvin, and a coupling γd>0 in square metres per square second. For the accelerated spectrum set r+=γdSa(E/ℏ),r−=γdSa(−E/ℏ). These are positive rates in seconds−1. Let p(t) be the probability of the excited state in the two-state chain with ground-to-excited rate r+ and excited-to-ground rate r−, where model time t is measured in seconds. For every t≥0 and any initial probability p(0)∈[0,1], then p(t)=p∗+(p(0)−p∗)e−(r++r−)t,p∗=11+e2πcE/(aℏ). If the effective thermometer temperature Teff>0 is defined by p∗/(1−p∗)=e−E/(kBTeff), then Teff=ℏa2πckB. This is an exact result for the specified Markov chain. It is not a weak coupling or point-detector thermalization theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the exact Fourier and tempered-distribution conventions; the two covariance/spectrum pairs in the preceding item; and positive a,c,E,ℏ,kB,γd with the units stated in the Statement, and an initial excited-state probability p(0)∈[0,1].

[A1]

Countable Choice is inherited from the Fourier suppliers and the draft thermal-contour supplier and its draft prerequisite. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[A2]

In the separately specified two-state continuous-time Markov model, the state order is (g,e) and probability distributions are row vectors. Its generator, with Qij the transition rate from state i to state j for i≠j, is Q=(−r+r+r−−r−). The row distribution π(t)=(1−p(t),p(t)) evolves by the forward equation π′(t)=π(t)Q with π(0)=(1−p(0),p(0)); this fixes the probability evolution meant by the chain in the Statement.

[F1]

The accelerated covariance, its spectrum conditional on the contour supplier, and the inertial covariance and spectrum C0,S0 are stated in Constructed timelike smear and massless accelerated spectrum.

[L1]

Draft supplier, not an accepted proof input: the actual batch-74 Statement of Single-pole thermal contour and exact detailed balance assumes its parameter κ>0 with units of inverse length. Renaming that parameter to α and its length variable s to u, it gives Cα(u)=−α2(16π)−1csch⁡2(α(u−i0)/2) and Sα(ω)=ω/[2(e2πω/α−1)], Sα(0)=α/(4π), and Sα(−ω)=e2πω/αSα(ω) for ω>0. Its declared prerequisite Positive chiral current and exponential test-coordinate model is also present as a batch-74 draft. Both current run Step-1 records report ready; this is authoring-readiness evidence, not proof acceptance. All accelerated conclusions below remain conditional on those actual statements and proof review, not on their labels.

[F2]

A tempered distribution is a continuous bilinear functional on Schwartz space, and its Fourier transform is defined by bilinear transposition with the negative-sign 2π convention. Tempered distribution Fourier transform of a tempered distribution

[F3]

Fourier transformation is an automorphism on tempered distributions, with inverse RF; on Schwartz functions the normalization is the negative-sign 2π transform. Fourier transform on tempered distributions is well defined and continuous Fourier transform is a topological automorphism of tempered distributions Fourier inversion on Schwartz space

[F4]

The Fourier transform agrees with the integral transform on L1 and with the Plancherel extension on L2; that extension is a unitary isometry under the negative-sign 2π convention. Fourier transform agrees with l one and plancherel transforms Plancherel theorem

[F5]

Absolute Fubini applies to the compactly supported time integrals used to form the autocorrelation of h. Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product

[F6]

Cc∞(R;R) consists of real smooth functions whose support is compact; these functions are Schwartz. Test function space d of an open set

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3F5F6givenalgebra

Put gT(t)=h(t/T) and AT(s)=∫gT(t)gT(t−s) dt. Compact support [F6] and [F5] permit the change of variables and interchange of the two ordinary integrals. Setting u=t and v=t−s, and using the reality of h, gives the negative-sign angular transform AT^(λ)=∫R2gT(u)gT(v)e−iλ(u−v) du dv=gT^(λ)gT^(−λ)=∣gT^(λ)∣2=T2∣h^(Tλ)∣2. By [F2] and [F3], the inverse angular-frequency relation is C(s)=(2π)−1∫S(ω)eiωs dω in the distributional sense: it is the negative-sign 2π inverse after the change ξ=ω/(2π). Pairing with e−iνsAT(s) gives the absolutely convergent formula RT(C)(ν)=T22π∫RS(ω)∣h^(T(ν−ω))∣2 dω. Here S has at most linear growth and h^ is rapidly decreasing, so the integral is finite.

2.1A1F4F6step 1.1givenalgebra

Since h∈Cc∞ by [F6], each derivative of h^ is obtained by transforming a compactly supported smooth function (−iu)jh(u); repeated integration by parts shows every such derivative decreases faster than any inverse power. Hence ∫∣z∣∣h^(z)∣2dz<∞. Plancherel in [F4], followed by z=2πξ, yields ∫R∣h^(z)∣2dz=2π∥h∥22. Changing variables z=T(ν−ω) in 1.1 therefore gives RT(C)(ν)T∥h∥22=12π∥h∥22∫RS(ν−z/T)∣h^(z)∣2 dz.

3.1F1L1step 2.1algebra

For C=C0, [F1] gives S0(ν)=max⁡(−ν,0)/(2πc2). On ν≤0 this is linear with slope −1/(2πc2), on ν≥0 it is zero, and for x≤0≤y, ∣S0(x)−S0(y)∣=−x/(2πc2)≤(y−x)/(2πc2). Thus its global Lipschitz constant is 1/(2πc2). For C=Ca, the conditional formula in [F1] is smooth at zero by its Taylor expansion, has bounded derivative on every compact interval, has bounded derivative as ν→+∞ by exponential decay. Its derivative is Sa′(ν)=12πc2ebν−1−bνebν(ebν−1)2,b=2πc/a. The Taylor expansion at zero makes this derivative finite there; as ν→+∞ it decays exponentially times a polynomial, and as ν→−∞ it tends −1/(2πc2). Thus it is bounded on both tails and on compact intervals, so both spectra are globally Lipschitz (the accelerated assertion is conditional on [L1]). Subtract S(ν) in step 2.1 and use ∣S(ν−z/T)−S(ν)∣≤Lip⁡(S)∣z∣/T. The definition of Kh gives the stated error bound and its 1/T limit.

4.1A2F1L1algebra∎

The accelerated spectrum is positive: for ν>0 numerator and denominator in [F1] are positive, for ν<0 they are both negative, and the zero limit is positive. Thus r+,r−>0. By [A2], the second component of π′=πQ gives p′(t)=r+(1−p(t))−r−p(t)=r+−(r++r−)p(t). Solving this scalar linear ODE gives p(t)=p∗+(p(0)−p∗)e−(r++r−)t with p∗=r+/(r++r−). For t≥0 seconds, this is a convex combination of p(0) and p∗∈(0,1), so it remains a probability. Apply [L1] at ν=E/ℏ>0 to get r−/r+=Sa(−ν)/Sa(ν)=e2πcν/a, so p∗=1/(1+e2πcE/(aℏ)). The ratio p∗/(1−p∗) is therefore e−2πcE/(aℏ). Comparing with its defining Boltzmann form gives Teff=ℏa/(2πckB). This calculation concerns only the specified Markov model and its adopted rates.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources