How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Reference-wall normalization preserves proper thermal and particle ratios
Example
Use the static subcase, finite coordinate slab, and open chart domain of Finite Killing energy current and reference normalization. Adopt that lemma's SI convention: , the spatial coordinates are in metres, has units , and the metric components and length-normalized Killing field are dimensionless. Let be future timelike and orthogonal to the coordinate slices, and put and for . Let be a specified smooth embedded codimension-one submanifold whose induced metric has signature (a timelike cavity wall), and choose a reference event in the static region. Put , which is dimensionless in this convention. No asymptotically flat end is assumed. Supply a function assigned units kelvins and interpreted as the local proper temperature measured by observer field , and a covector field on whose components have units . When a particle-energy interpretation is used, supply a vector field on that is future-directed and causal and satisfies at each ; its components then have the same units as because the metric is dimensionless. Define, pointwise on , and . Rescale the generator by . The reference lapse is then , while the normalized temperature and particle-energy ratios at every are unchanged: For each slice charge defined in Finite Killing energy current and reference normalization, . This choice is meaningful in a finite cavity without an asymptotic normalization; it does not make spatially constant or assert that distinct reference-wall choices produce equal local temperatures.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The exact finite static-slice current and rescaling clauses of Finite Killing energy current and reference normalization, its finite rectangular slab convention, a positive reference lapse at , and supplied fields and with the units and causal-momentum condition stated above.
Assume , the Axiom of Countable Choice, as required by the connection construction and recorded in The Axiom of Countable Choice ().
In its static subcase, Finite Killing energy current and reference normalization derives , , and for every dimensionless ; it defines the mechanical pairing . Its finite charge uses the open spatial rectangle with compact closure specified by MI01.
The SI reading of Finite Killing energy current and reference normalization takes with in , spatial coordinates in metres, dimensionless metric components, and normalized so that its flow parameter has units of length. Thus and are dimensionless, and the pairing factor in has units .
Finite spacelike slab and normal flux charge defines a positively oriented product slab with open spatial rectangle and compact closure with spacelike slices, future unit normal, and proper spatial volume . It assigns no physical units to its mathematical coordinates; this example's SI length convention is additional data.
is a specified smooth timelike embedded hypersurface, is the selected event in the static region, and . The supplied fields are and with the units in the Statement. For the particle-energy interpretation, is a future-directed causal vector field on and for every .
Verification
Since with , its norm satisfies , and . The normalized field is unchanged.
The temperature definition gives ; the mechanical pairing gives ; and [F1] gives the same scaling for the finite Killing charge. Dividing by proves both displayed ratio identities and the charge statement.
The right sides of the ratio identities are the supplied and the contraction . Neither definition imposes spatial constancy, so the normalization calculation proves neither thermal equilibrium nor equality between distinct wall choices.