How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Crossing evenness at the scalar subtraction point
Statement
Let , let be the forward slice of identical-scalar amplitude data satisfying , and let be a finite sum of isolated simple real pole principal parts in and their crossing partners, satisfying . Put wherever these expressions are defined. Then . If is complex differentiable in a neighbourhood of , then .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the forward variable , the crossing relation , and the crossing-symmetric pole-subtracted amplitude data.
Gapped identical-scalar forward-amplitude data: at , , , , and with .
The displayed crossing equalities hold wherever both sides are defined.
Proof
Set . Then the crossed value is . By [A1], and . Subtracting the pole terms gives .
Differentiate at . The chain rule gives ; since in , .
Depends on
Dependency tree · 1 level
Sources
- Allan Adams, Nima Arkani-Hamed, Sergei Dubovsky, Alberto Nicolis, and Riccardo Rattazzi, Causality, Analyticity and an IR Obstruction to UV Completion
- Claudia de Rham, Scott Melville, Andrew J. Tolley, and Shuang-Yong Zhou, Positivity Bounds for Scalar Theories
- Ivano Basile, Luca Buoninfante, Francesco Di Filippo, Benjamin Knorr, Alessia Platania, and Anna Tokareva, Lectures in Quantum Gravity