Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exactness of invariant vectors for a finite-dimensional quotient

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let G be a complex reductive affine algebraic group, let V be a finite-dimensional complex vector space with an algebraic representation ρ:G→GL⁡(V), and let N≤V be a linear subspace satisfying ρ(g)N=N for every g∈G. Define VG={v∈V:ρ(g)v=v for all g∈G}, give V/N the induced representation, and let π:V→V/N be the quotient map. Then the restriction πG:VG→(V/N)G is surjective and has kernel VG∩N. Consequently the map

VG/(VG∩N)⟶(V/N)G,v+(VG∩N)⟼v+N

is a canonical complex-linear isomorphism.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC; a complex reductive affine algebraic group G; a finite-dimensional rational G-module V; and a G-stable subspace N≤V.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function.

[F1]

Reductive and linearly reductive complex algebraic groups: G is reductive when it has no nontrivial closed normal unipotent subgroup; here unipotent uses the fixed-vector condition on nonzero finite-dimensional rational modules.

[F2]

Complete reducibility and the Reynolds operator for a complex reductive group: assuming AC and complex reductive affine algebraic G, every rational G-module has a natural Reynolds projection onto its invariant subspace, and a surjective equivariant map of rational G-modules induces a surjective map of invariant subspaces.

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

Since N is G-stable, g⋅(v+N):=ρ(g)v+N is well-defined on V/N. In a basis extending a basis of N, the quotient action is the lower-right block of the algebraic matrix ρ(g), so V/N is a finite-dimensional rational G-module; the quotient map π is surjective and equivariant. Its restriction maps VG into (V/N)G, and its kernel is ker⁡(π∣VG)=VG∩N by the definition of the quotient.

1.2givenA1F1F2

Under A1 and the reductive hypothesis F1, apply F2 to the equivariant surjection π; it follows that πG:VG→(V/N)G is surjective.

2.1givenstep 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

The displayed map is well-defined because changing v by an element of VG∩N leaves v+N unchanged. It is injective by the kernel computation in step 1.1 and surjective by step 1.2, so it is the claimed canonical linear isomorphism.

Remarks

The commutative diagram displays the exact invariant sequence established in the proof. The horizontal map πG is the quotient map restricted to invariants; the vertical arrows are the natural inclusions into the underlying modules. The top row is exact because steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove its kernel and surjectivity. The diagram summarizes those algebraic maps and is not a premise of the proof.

0VG\NVG(V=N)G00NVV=N0¼GN¼

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources