Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A local counterterm changes only the representative of a local anomaly class

Statement

Let AUg,p be the finite-jet horizontal-form spaces on a smooth open set U⊆R4, with nilpotent BRST differential s, horizontal differential dH, and sdH+dHs=0. In bidegree (1,4), define H1,4(s∣dH) as the ghost-number-one four-forms a4 satisfying sa4+dHb3=0 for some b3, modulo the subspace {sC4+dHr3:C4∈AU0,4, r3∈AU1,3}. If a local counterterm changes an anomaly representative from a4 to a4′=a4+sC4+dHr3, then [a4′]=[a4] in H1,4(s∣dH).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The local BRST complex, the relative cohomology quotient, and a counterterm change a4′−a4=sC4+dHr3.

[F1]

Local BRST Cohomology Modulo Total Derivatives: the denominator of H1,4(s∣dH) is exactly {sC4+dHr3:C4∈AU0,4, r3∈AU1,3}.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

By the assumed transformation rule, a4′−a4=sC4+dHr3, which is an element of the denominator subspace in [F1].

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

Two cocycles whose difference belongs to the denominator define the same quotient class. Therefore [a4′]=[a4] in the stated local BRST cohomology.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources