How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Barycentric face chains triangulate a geometric simplex
Statement
For a finite geometric simplex , the convex hulls of barycenters along strict chains of nonempty faces form a triangulation of . Each such chain is affinely independent. Two chain simplices intersect in exactly the simplex spanned by their common face labels, with empty intersection when there are no common labels.
Source locators
2.5.8 and 2.5.10, pp.49–52.
Facts & Assumptions
Barycenters have equal coordinates on their face. Canonical barycentric realization map.
Affine coordinates in the original simplex are unique. Barycentric coordinates are unique.
Proof
Given: A simplex with unique barycentric coordinates, and strict chains of its nonempty faces.
Let a point have distinct positive coordinate levels , put , and set . These are nested nonempty faces. With , a vertex whose coordinate is has coordinate in . Also . Thus every point lies in a chain simplex.
For any strict chain , the vectors are linearly independent in barycentric coordinate space: in , a coordinate in gives , and descending induction gives every (finish with any vertex of ). Hence they are affinely independent in the original simplex too, by uniqueness of its affine coordinates.
If a point is expressed in one of these chain simplices, delete zero weights. Its coordinate on the successive layers of the remaining chain is strictly decreasing, with consecutive differences equal to the corresponding positive weight divided by the face cardinality. Thus the positive-weight faces are exactly the level sets in the first step and the weights are exactly . In two chain representations only common face labels can therefore carry positive weights. Conversely every convex combination of common labels belongs to both simplices. This proves precisely the intersection assertion and hence the triangulation. The empty simplex has no points; a one-vertex simplex has the sole weight .