Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Virasoro modes give an Aut O action with field covariance

Statement

Let V be a conformal vertex algebra of CFT type and M an integrally graded conformal V-module. For ρ(t)=at+O(t2)∈Aut⁡O, let a≠0 be its linear coefficient and set γ(t):=a−1ρ(t)=t+O(t2). Factor γ uniquely on each finite jet as exp⁡(∑n≥1cnℓn)(t), where ℓn=−tn+1∂t uses the right-composition convention of Formal-coordinate change group Aut O. Define RM(ρ):=aLM(0)exp⁡ ⁣(−∑n≥1cnLM(n)), and define RV by the same formula. More generally, for a commutative C-algebra A and σ(u)=b1u+b2u2+⋯∈A⟦u⟧ with b1∈A×, use the right-composition product (σ1σ2)(u)=σ2(σ1(u)), and write RM,A(σ) and RV,A(σ) for the same finite-jet formulas, extended A-linearly to MA:=M⊗CA and VA:=V⊗CA. On Md⊗A, b1LM(0) means multiplication by b1d, and on Vd⊗A use b1LV(0) with the same convention; the coefficients of the positive-mode exponentials are in A. This extension is functorial in A and obeys the same right-action law. The sums are interpreted coefficientwise on finite jets and are finite on each vector, as justified below.

For ρ(t)=∑r≥1artr, set ρz(u):=ρ(z+u)−ρ(z). For j≥1, its coefficient of uj is ∑r≥jar(rj)zr−j, so ρz∈C⟦z⟧⟦u⟧ has linear coefficient ρ′(z)∈C⟦z⟧×. The state-field covariance identity is RM(ρ)YM(v,z)RM(ρ)−1=YM ⁣(RV,C⟦z⟧(ρz)v,ρ(z)). The field on the right is substituted coefficientwise: RV,C⟦z⟧(ρz)v has coefficients in a finite-dimensional filtration stage of V, and ρ(z) has order one, so lower truncation makes every coefficient on a fixed module vector a finite sum. The identity is coefficientwise in formal distributions. No analytic convergence is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The formal group and its right-composition Lie algebra, an ordinary conformal vertex algebra, and an integrally graded conformal module.

[F1]

Formal-coordinate change group Aut O: for any commutative C-algebra A, Aut⁡AA⟦t⟧ consists of substitutions with unit linear coefficient and product (ρ1ρ2)(t)=ρ2(ρ1(t)); over C, ℓn=−tn+1∂t satisfies [ℓm,ℓn]=(m−n)ℓm+n.

[F2]

Integrally graded conformal module: LM(0) is diagonalizable with integer eigenvalues bounded below and LM(n)Md⊆Md−n for n>0.

[F3]

Conformal vertex algebra of CFT type: V=⨁d≥0Vd, each Vd is finite dimensional, and L(−1)=T.

[F4]

Virasoro algebra in the Lm convention: [L(m),L(n)]=(m−n)L(m+n)+m3−m12δm+n,0C.

[F5]

Module for an ordinary vertex algebra: the module Jacobi identity holds with the stated formal binomial expansions.

[F6]

Formal distributions and fields on a vector space: formal delta functions, residues, and substitutions are coefficientwise formal operations, not analytic limits.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4algebra

For a vector of weight d, every LM(n) with n>d−d0 kills it by [F2]. Thus only finitely many n and finitely many powers of ∑cnLM(n) act nontrivially on that vector. On the jet modulo tr+1, the coefficient of degree k+1 in exp⁡(∑cnℓn)(t) is −ck plus an expression in c1,…,ck−1; recursive solution gives unique c1,…,cr. The Virasoro central term in [F4] vanishes for positive indices. The assignment ℓn↦−LM(n) is anti-Lie for the right action, since [−LM(m),−LM(n)]=(m−n)LM(m+n)=−(−LM([ℓm,ℓn])). The finite Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff formula on each nilpotent jet quotient therefore gives compatible right actions; [LM(0),LM(n)]=−nLM(n) supplies the scaling compatibility. Integer weights in [F2] make aLM(0) single-valued. More explicitly, for A as in the Statement and a unit b∈A×, bLM(0) acts on Md⊗A by bd, which is defined for every integer d. For a fixed m∈Md, ∑n≥1cnLM(n)m is finite because LM(n)m=0 for n>d−d0, and every sufficiently high power of this degree-lowering sum kills m; hence its exponential is a finite sum even when cn∈A. The finite-jet factorization recursion and the Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff identities use only ring operations, rational scalars, and inversion of the unit leading coefficient, so they hold over A and give the asserted functorial right action. On V, [F4] gives [LV(0),LV(n)]=−nLV(n), so LV(n)Vd⊆Vd−n; the same argument applies using the nonnegative integral grading and finite-dimensional stages in [F3].

1.2F3F5F6algebra

Taking the conformal-vector residues in [F5] gives, for every integer q≥0, [LM(q),YM(v,z)]=∑j=0q+1(q+1j)zq+1−jYM(L(j−1)v,z). The j=0 term is zq+1YM(Tv,z)=zq+1∂zYM(v,z), by L(−1)=T in [F3] and the translation identity obtained from the module Jacobi identity. Hence [−LM(q),YM(v,z)]=−zq+1∂zYM(v,z)−∑j=1q+1(q+1j)zq+1−jYM(L(j−1)v,z). This is the infinitesimal covariance formula for the coordinate vector field ℓq=−zq+1∂z: its base-point velocity is −zq+1 and its relative-coordinate velocity is −(z+u)q+1+zq+1=−∑j=1q+1(q+1j)zq+1−juj. Under RV, the latter acts on v by the state term in the displayed commutator.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

On every finite jet, the covariance identity derived in step 1.2 and composed below uses only polynomial operations and inversion of the leading coefficient. The same finite-jet computation therefore holds over any commutative C-algebra A. For ρz, take A=C⟦z⟧; its leading coefficient ρ′(z) is a unit, so step 1.1 applies. For a homogeneous v∈Vd, positive modes lower weight and the diagonal factor preserves weight; consequently RV,A(ρz)v has coefficients in V≤d. Since V≤d is finite dimensional, lower truncation of YM(e,w)m is uniform over a basis e of this stage for each fixed m∈M. Writing ρ(z)=zq(z) with q(0)=a1≠0, each integer power ρ(z)n has order n; the uniform lower bound on the field powers and the nonnegative z-orders of the state coefficients therefore make every coefficient of the substituted field a finite sum. Thus the covariance identity is well-defined coefficientwise. For the formal flow of each ℓq, differentiate both sides of the claimed covariance identity with respect to the flow parameter. The derivative of the conjugated left side is the commutator in step 1.2; the chain rule on the right gives the base-point and relative-coordinate velocities computed there. At parameter zero the two sides coincide, so their coefficientwise formal differential equation has equal initial values and equal recursively determined coefficients. This proves covariance for each elementary flow. For ρ(t)=at, the q=0 commutator in step 1.2 integrates to aLM(0)YM(v,z)a−LM(0)=YM(aLV(0)v,az); integer weights remove any logarithm choice. Every finite jet of a general ρ is a product of such a scaling and the elementary positive-mode flows by the recursion in step 1.1. Composing their covariance identities using the right-action law in step 1.1 proves the formula on every finite jet and therefore coefficientwise on the formal series.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources