Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Difference-one spanning and finite degree spans for cyclic weak modules

Statement

Let V be a C2-cofinite conformal vertex algebra of CFT type over C. Choose a finite set A of homogeneous positive-weight states such that {1}∪A represents a basis of V/C2(V). Let W be a left V-module generated by a vector w, with no assumed grading or local finiteness of its conformal operator. Choose an integer N≥1 such that a(n)w=0 for every a∈A and n≥N. For each integer d let Hd(w) be the span of all finite strings of homogeneous state modes applied to w whose total operator degree is d, where deg⁡(a(n))=wt(a)−n−1, and the empty string has degree zero. Then Hd(w) is spanned by strings

a(i1)1⋯a(iℓ)ℓw,aj∈A,i1<⋯<iℓ<N,∑j=1ℓ(wt(aj)−ij−1)=d.

Every such string satisfies d≥ℓ(ℓ−1)/2−ℓ(N−1). Consequently each Hd(w) is finite dimensional, Hd(w)=0 for all sufficiently negative d, and W=∑d∈ZHd(w). This sum is not asserted to be direct. In particular the definition of Hd(w) does not assume that w is a conformal eigenvector.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Conformal vertex algebra of CFT type gives the nonnegative integral state grading, finite-dimensional state-weight spaces, and V0=C1. C2-cofiniteness gives finite codimension of C2(V).

[F2]

Jacobi and residue calculus from the state-field locality axioms proves adjoint Jacobi, state-product weights, and the module iterate and commutator identities from the actual locality-based state-field convention. Thus wt(a(n)b)=wt(a)+wt(b)−n−1 for nonzero homogeneous products, and C2(V) is homogeneous.

[F3]

Module for an ordinary vertex algebra supplies vectorwise mode truncation and the vacuum action. For the finite set A, truncation supplies the common cutoff N in the Statement.

Proof

Given: The algebra, representatives, cyclic vector, cutoff, and degree spans in the Statement.

1.1F1F2F3algebra

Fix d. Filter its mode words by total state weight p≥0, then length ℓ≥0, in lexicographic order. All reductions below preserve d. A homogeneous state v is a linear combination of same-weight representatives and homogeneous a(−2)b. Replacing v(n) by the iterate expansion of (a(−2)b)(n) replaces its weight wt(a)+wt(b)+1 by the smaller total weight wt(a)+wt(b). The expansion is finite on the fixed tail vector, by the rightmost-mode truncations in the iterate identity. Thus these replacements lower p, irrespective of length. A weight-zero representative is a scalar vacuum; its mode is either zero or the identity and so shortens the word without changing p,d. Induction on p, and within a fixed p on length, therefore reduces the problem to words in A. When p=0 only vacuum words occur, reducing to the empty word or zero.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Interchanging adjacent modes uses [a(m),b(n)]=∑t≥0(mt)(a(t)b)(m+n−t). Every nonzero commutator state has weight wt(a)+wt(b)−t−1, strictly smaller than the replaced total weight; these errors are already treated by induction on p. The commutator sum is finite by state truncation. Bubble sorting the unchanged-length terms therefore reduces any A-word modulo lower p to nondecreasing mode indices. A sorted word with last index at least N kills w. This cutoff is obtained before any claim of strict indices, and uses only truncation on w, not an assumed lower conformal-weight bound.

3.1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra

At fixed p,ℓ,d, there are only finitely many nondecreasing index tuples with last index less than N that can occur in A-words of total state weight p. Indeed their sum is p−ℓ−d, so each index is at most N−1 and at least p−ℓ−d−(ℓ−1)(N−1). This supplies a finite set of tuples with its usual lexicographic order. We may therefore induct upwards in that finite order to remove equal indices. Fix an adjacent repetition a(i)b(i) and write its tail as u. The normal-product iterate formula is (a(−1)b)(2i+1)u=∑t≥0(a(−1−t)b(2i+1+t)+b(2i−t)a(t))u. If i<0, the first sum has exactly one term with both indices i, at t=−i−1; if i≥0, the second has exactly one, at t=i, with reversed order b(i)a(i). In the latter case interchange that pair using step 2.1; its error has lower p. Every remaining two-mode term has unequal indices summing to 2i, hence one less than i. Sorting the resulting full word by step 2.1 gives a lexicographically smaller tuple, or zero by its last-index cutoff. The collapsed mode of a(−1)b has the same p and degree as the pair but shorter length, so is already treated by the length induction; replacing its state by representatives if needed is covered by step 1.1. Thus the finite tuple induction removes this repetition. All iterate sums are finite on u, and no uniform tail truncation bound is presumed. At fixed filtration the reductions shorten length or lower the finite tuple order; terms at lower filtration were already fully reduced by the outer induction and may have different lengths. All final strings retain degree d.

4.1F1step 3.1algebra∎

The previous inductions apply to every finite p,ℓ, so they span the actual Hd(w), which allows unbounded filtration and length. We now bound the resulting spanning family independently of that filtration. Every representative has weight at least one. A strict length-ℓ tuple with indices less than N satisfies ij≤N−1−(ℓ−j), so d=∑j(wt(aj)−ij−1)≥−∑jij≥ℓ(ℓ−1)/2−ℓ(N−1). This quadratic has a finite lower bound and tends to positive infinity with ℓ. At fixed d only finitely many lengths are possible. For each such length there are finitely many choices of the states in A; their total weight fixes the index sum, and the argument of step 3.1 gives finitely many index tuples. Therefore the full spanning family for Hd(w) is finite; below the minimum of that quadratic it is empty. Finally the cyclic generation definition gives W=∑dHd(w), without requiring directness.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources