Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Explicit cylinder sewing inverse by logarithmic coefficient extraction

Statement

Assume full AC. Let F be a fixed compact pointed curve with two outgoing coordinate disks of radii r and ρ, an admitted joint module W at its incoming marks, and an incoming mark on every component. Write D=DF(W)⊂W∗ for the actual partial-block dual fusion product and γ(w,d)=d(w). Let N be the two-point sphere with coordinates 1/z,z at infinity and zero, and place the two-component restricted contragredient D' on these points. Sewing F to N with parameters p1,p2, 0<∣p1∣<r, 0<∣p2∣<ρ, gives a curve canonically equal to the self-plumbing of F with q=p1p2. Fix logarithm lifts ℓ1,ℓ2∈C with eℓi=pi, and use ℓ=ℓ1+ℓ2 as the logarithm lift of q. All complex powers and sewing evaluations below use these lifts on the universal covers of the punctured parameter disks. Then the map Γ:CBN(D′)⟶CBFq(W),χ⟼Sewp1,p2(γ⊗χ) is an isomorphism. Its inverse is the coefficient functional constructed in the Proof. If Q is the sphere with the same two outgoing points and one incoming point 1 carrying V, and DQ(V) its dual fusion product, the equivalent cylinder insertion map CBF(W⊗DQ(V)′)⟶CBFq(W) obtained by sewing to ω=γQ(1,−) is also an isomorphism. Modules need not split into tensor factors.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Exactly the curve, coordinates, modules, nonzero parameters and logarithm lifts above. In particular log⁡q=ℓ1+ℓ2 throughout.

[F1]

Existence of C2-cofinite dual fusion products realizes D as the union of finite partial-block spaces (W/Ja,b)∗, with evaluation injective into W*, actual outgoing fields, full grading restriction and the universal property. Finite partial coinvariants on a fixed pointed compact curve specifies the outgoing lattice ta+wt⁡vv dt.

[F2]

Positive-pole base change and logarithmic lifts for analytic plumbing supplies actual positive-pole direct images with central-fiber evaluation isomorphisms, global finite incoming generators and logarithmic lifts over the complete q-disk. Relative coinvariant generators and actual Virasoro matrices supplies the explicit Ward-ideal preservation on its smooth locus.

[F3]

Local freeness of C2-cofinite conformal-block sheaves supplies the smooth punctured-disk block bundle and actual fiber identification. Analytic convergence of Segal sewing for C2-cofinite VOA blocks, including its derived Schwarzian scalar, proves ordinary sewing and the coefficientwise sewing differential identity.

[F5]

Serre duality on a compact Riemann surface gives H1(L)=0 when a line bundle L has degree greater than the canonical degree. Long exact sequence of sheaf cohomology carries this through a finite line filtration and gives the finite-jet evaluation exact sequence. The state-bundle filtration and its outgoing lattice frames are those constructed in F1's partial-coinvariant supplier.

Proof

1.1F2F3algebra

Let y~ be F2's logarithmic lift of q∂q, and put A(q)=∑iRes⁡hi(q,ti)Yi(ω,ti)dti on W. Let κ(q) be the holomorphic Schwarzian scalar constructed in F3 for this lift and a meromorphic projective coefficient on the normalization. The operator q∂q−A(q)+κ(q) preserves the Ward ideal on the smooth locus by F2. It is a connection there after division by q. In one complex dimension it has no curvature two-form. For completeness, every cylinder sewing is parallel for its dual connection: the sphere Ward identity makes the completed vector corresponding to chi supported on diagonal weights, with equal nilpotent component actions. After multiplication by p1L+(0)p2L−(0) it depends only on q=p1p2 and satisfies the annular residue balance, by moving a mode across the sphere pairing and conjugating by these powers. The two paired raw conformal residues of the lift therefore add with coefficients a+b=1 to its q derivative. The normalization conformal Ward identity of F3 then gives q∂qS(w)=S(−A(q)w)+κ(q)S(w), precisely dual parallelism. This is the same finite-coefficient calculation as F3, with the sphere pairing in place of its identity coevaluation. There is no assumption that an arbitrary sewing is parallel for the uncorrected Virasoro operator.

1.2F2constructalgebra

We first establish the finite-order extension actually needed below; F2 is not assumed to supply an outgoing-jet matching inverse. Fix a finite state cutoff and an incoming pole bound k≥k0, and set E=V≤d,C⊗ωC/Δ(kDin) on a small disk about q=0. By F2 there are actual total holomorphic sections s1,…,sa whose central restrictions form a basis of H0(C0,E0). Put Ch=(C0,(OC/(qh+1))∣C0) and Eh=E/qh+1E; these symbols denote a finite ringed-space thickening only for this local argument, not an assumed base-change theorem for nonreduced bases. Multiplication by q is injective on E: in a node chart q=xy is a nonzero divisor in C{x,y}, and off the node it is a coordinate. Consequently the kernel of Eh→E0 is canonically qEh−1. For any global section t of Eh, express t∣C0=∑iai,0si∣C0 and subtract this actual section. The difference divides uniquely by q as a global section of Eh−1. Repeat finitely many times. This writes t=∑j=0hqj∑iai,jsi modulo qh+1, so the polynomial combination on the right is an actual holomorphic extension. Uniqueness of division makes the local quotients glue. The argument uses actual central section surjectivity and a finite induction; no convergence of a formal correction or Banach matching inverse is required.

1.3F1F5constructalgebra

The normalization interpolation used below also has a direct finite-dimensional proof. At either outgoing point allow a specified finite pole order and prescribe finitely many Laurent coefficients in a finite state-weight truncation. Let Z be the sum of the two outgoing points. The kernel of this finite jet map is a finite-rank bundle whose filtration quotients are fixed line bundles further twisted by a fixed multiple of −Z and by kDin. Since Din meets every normalization component, increasing k makes every quotient degree exceed the corresponding canonical degree. F5 gives zero H1 for the kernel, first for its line quotients and then by the finite filtration. The jet exact sequence is therefore surjective on global sections. A linear right inverse exists because its target is finite dimensional. This proves simultaneous independent interpolation at both branches with finite incoming poles; it does not assume any coefficient belongs to D.

2.1F2F3step 1.1construct

Given a block ψq0 on any smooth fiber, extend it uniquely to a parallel block ψ on the universal cover of the punctured q-disk, with its initial value specified at the chosen lift ℓ=ℓ1+ℓ2 of q0. Locally this is the finite matrix equation in a block-bundle frame: Picard iterated integrals converge on each relatively compact disk by their factorial bound. Finite chains of such disks give continuation along any compact path; uniqueness on overlap and subdivision of homotopies give the solution on the simply connected cover. F2's fixed finite generators give its evaluation column a finite Euler system q∂qf=B(q)f with B holomorphic on the whole disk: reduce the finitely many images under the operator in step 1.1 modulo the global Ward span. This construction is valid even if this generating column has redundant coordinates.

3.1step 2.1algebra

We prove the regular-singular expansion needed here. Take a basis of the rank-s block space at q0 and let Y(q) be its d-by-s evaluation matrix on the finite generators. Parallel continuation around zero gives an invertible s-by-s monodromy matrix T, with Y(t+2πi)=Y(t)T for q=et. Choose a matrix C with e2πiC=T: on each Jordan block write T=λ(I+N) and use a logarithm of the nonzero scalar λ and the finite series for log⁡(I+N). Then H(q)=Y(q)e−tC is single valued and holomorphic on the punctured disk. It has at most a pole at zero. Indeed boundedness of B gives along every radial segment ∥Y(q)∥≤C1∣q∣−C2 by the integral inequality and its elementary exponential iteration. A bounded interval of arguments adds a uniform finite factor. The same polynomial bound, times a finite logarithmic power, holds for e−tC by its Jordan form. Thus ∥H(q)∥≤C3∣q∣−C4; the Cauchy integral for its Laurent coefficients makes all sufficiently negative coefficients zero. Hence Y=H(q)etC has a convergent finite-exponent, uniformly finite-log expansion. It converges on the full punctured disk, since H is holomorphic there and meromorphic at zero.

4.1F2step 3.1algebra

Every W vector is a holomorphic combination of the same finite generators modulo global Ward relations, by F2. Multiplying their expansions by those holomorphic coefficients therefore gives ψ(w)=∑n∈E+N∑l=0Lψn,l(w)qn(log⁡q)l, with one finite exponent-coset set and one L for all w. Combine equal exponents and choose distinct coset representatives. Coefficients are linear functionals on W and all indicated series converge absolutely locally uniformly. Such coefficients are unique: the deck shift on the finite log space has distinct eigenvalues e2πie for distinct cosets, so finite polynomial spectral projectors separate the cosets. In one coset repeated finite differences in log⁡q↦log⁡q+2πi separate its logarithmic powers, and Taylor uniqueness separates the remaining integral powers. The same argument proves that the Ward identities for any total holomorphic nodal current v(q)=∑k≥0qkvk give ∑k≥0ψm−k,l(vk⋅w)=0. For fixed w the residue action of v(q) has values in a fixed finite W-span, by its finite state and pole cutoffs. Therefore its convergent Taylor series may be paired termwise and regrouped; the displayed coefficient sum is finite by the common lower exponent bound.

5.1F1F2step 4.1step 1.2construct

Each coefficient ψn,l belongs to the actual D of F1. If ψ=0, this is immediate; otherwise the finite-exponent expansion from step 3.1 has a nonempty representative set. Let E be the finite set of exponent representatives furnished by steps 3.1–4.1, put β=min⁡α∈ERe⁡α, and let b be a common real lower bound for the generalized weights of D, supplied by F1. Set b‾=min⁡{β,b}. For the fixed complex exponent n choose an integer h≥0 with h+1>Re⁡n−b‾. This real-part inequality ensures that an O(qh+1) error cannot contribute to the coefficient at exponent n: by step 4.1 every term it multiplies has exponent α+m with α∈E and m∈N, so every resulting exponent has real part at least β+h+1≥b‾+h+1>Re⁡n. The bound also incorporates the module lower bound b; it does not require identifying the target coefficient as a module weight. Let sigma be any normalization current in the outgoing lattice at levels (h,h), with arbitrary finite incoming poles. In the node current frame its two branch coefficients vanish to order at least h+1: a state of weight d contributes xd+hdx=xh+1(xddx/x), and similarly on the other branch. Define the node section by the sum of these two one-variable series. On the exterior take sigma constant in q. Its matching error is O(qh+1), since every crossed series monomial is qmx−m or qmy−m with m≥h+1. These exterior and node sections therefore glue modulo qh+1 to a section of Eh, after choosing a finite state cutoff and an incoming pole bound containing σ and at least k0. Step 1.2 extends it to an actual total current v(q)=σ+O(qh+1) on the exterior, with a finite incoming pole bound. Step 4.1 then says ψn,l(σ⋅w)=0. Since h is fixed for the coefficient, this holds for every sigma in that lattice. Thus ψn,l∈(W/Jh,h)∗⊂D. This proves membership, not merely formal outgoing truncation in W*.

5.2F1F3step 1.1step 4.1algebra

If Γ(χ)=0 at the chosen nonzero parameter, its cylinder sewing is a parallel section for step 1.1 and hence zero everywhere by finite ODE uniqueness. Sphere Ward for L(0) makes chi supported on diagonal joint weights, with matching nilpotent actions. Its constant-log coefficient at qn is the vector χ[n,n]∈D[n,n] evaluated on W. Expansion uniqueness from step 4.1 and the injection D⊂W∗ make every such vector zero, hence chi zero. This proves injectivity independently of a dimension comparison.

6.1F1F2F4step 4.1step 1.2step 1.3step 5.1algebra

We next prove the annular balance relation for these D-valued coefficients. For every state u and every power series f(x,y), Res⁡xf(x,q/x)Y+(xL(0)−1u,x)∑nψn,lqn dx=Res⁡yf(q/y,y)Y−(yL(0)−1Ju,y)∑nψn,lqn dy, where J=eL(1)(−1)L(0). Here is the finite-jet justification. Work modulo each exponent coset times qh+1; only finitely many coefficient vectors occur, all in D by step 5.1. Choose a branch jet order Q so large that every error at order Q annihilates those finitely many vectors under both outgoing residue actions, using their uniform state-weight pole cutoff in F1. On the normalization, lift the desired branch jets of the node current f(x,y)xL(0)u dx/x coefficientwise through q order h. Step 1.3 gives these lifts with finite incoming poles: for the finitely many q-coefficients under consideration prescribe the finite Laurent jets of the desired branch expressions through order Q in the normalized node frame. Their negative powers are bounded by the q-truncation, so this is a finite interpolation problem. Their branch errors have order Q. Add these two regular one-branch error series to the local node normal form, so the same-branch errors match exactly. Choose Q>h as well. The remaining crossed errors are then O(qh+1), so the tuple is an actual section modulo qh+1. Step 1.2 extends it to a total nodal current without changing its first h exterior coefficients, after enlarging its finite incoming pole bound if necessary. Step 4.1 annihilates its incoming residue convolution. Apply the universal evaluation block of F1 to the same normalization coefficients: its incoming residues are minus the two outgoing actions. The chosen Q kills the branch errors on our finite coefficient vectors, leaving exactly the displayed difference, with the sign dx/x=−dy/y. This proves the identity modulo every h, hence coefficientwise, for arbitrary f; only finitely many coefficients of f enter each truncation.

7.1F4step 6.1algebra

Define degree-indexed modes u[k]=Res⁡zk+wt⁡u−1Y(u,z)dz, and define uo[k] with the opposite field. In step 6.1 use f=xk if k≥0 and f=y−k if k<0, and make the substitution y=z−1 on its right side. The opposite-field formula and residue inversion give u+[k]ψn,l=u−o[k]ψn−k,l. This explicitly keeps the shifted mode convention: u[k] lowers weight by k, while uo[k] raises it by k. For the conformal vector this includes L+(0)ψn,l=L−(0)ψn,l.

8.1F3step 1.1step 6.1step 7.1algebra

Write the lift near its fixture as a(x,y)x∂x+b(x,y)y∂y, with a+b=1. The Schwarzian Ward identity from F3 applied on the normalization to each coefficient field of the lift, and the parallel equation in step 1.1, give q∂qψ=∑m≥0qm(ν(vm)++ν(vm)−)ψ. Indeed the incoming term from the parallel equation is −ψ(A(q)w)+κψ(w); the raw conformal Ward scalar says this is the paired outgoing action. Step 6.1 with u=ω moves the minus residue to the plus branch, where its coefficient adds to a. Their sum is one, so the right side is L+(0)ψ, and also L−(0)ψ. Comparing coefficients gives (L±(0)−n)ψn,l=(l+1)ψn,l+1. The finite chain in l proves ψn,l∈D[n,n], and its nilpotent conformal parts satisfy N±ψn,l=(l+1)ψn,l+1. This derives both weights and logarithmic coefficients, rather than presuming that an expansion exponent is a module weight.

9.1F3F4step 7.1step 8.1construct

Define χ∈(D′)∗ by χ(d′)=∑n⟨ψn,0,d′⟩. This is a finite sum for every d', since step 8.1 puts its summands in distinct diagonal joint weight blocks and d' has finite support. Step 7.1, summed over n and transposed in the restricted pairing, says χ(u+o[k]d′)=χ(u−[k]d′). These are precisely the two-point sphere Ward identities in coordinates 1/z,z: Laurent monomials and the opposite transformation exhaust the global meromorphic currents there. Thus χ∈CBN(D′). Moreover p1L+(0)p2L−(0)ψn,0=qn∑l=0L(log⁡q)lψn,l,q=p1p2, by the nilpotent recurrence in step 8.1. Finite weight-basis contraction in the sewing tensor therefore gives Γ(χ)=ψ∣q0 exactly. Ordinary convergence in F3 justifies its analytic evaluation. This is the promised explicit right inverse.

10.1F1F3F4step 9.1step 5.2algebra∎

Finally the representing property for D identifies CBF(W⊗DQ(V)′) with Hom⁡(DQ(V)′,D). Restricted transposition identifies this with Hom⁡(D′,DQ(V)). The representing property for DQ(V) followed by vacuum evaluation identifies the latter space with CBN(D′), using F4's actual propagation isomorphism. On arguments these maps are simply composition with ω=γQ(1,−), so finite coefficient contraction shows that their composite with Gamma is exactly the asserted cylinder insertion sewing. It is therefore an isomorphism as well. No rationality, simple-object expansion or finite tensor-category theorem is needed.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources