How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-jet integration of positive Virasoro operators
Statement
Let be a conformal vertex algebra of CFT type and a nonnegative integer. Set . Let be the group of truncated series , with composition modulo . Every has a unique expression modulo . The assignment is a representation of . Its matrix entries are polynomials in . It is compatible with restriction from to and with truncation of jets. In particular no convergence of the formal logarithmic vector field is required.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The grading is nonnegative integral with finite-dimensional pieces, and , for , by Conformal vertex algebra of CFT type and Virasoro algebra in the convention. The central term vanishes for these indices.
Proof
Given: The objects and integer in the statement. All series and matrices below are truncated; gives the trivial group and identity operator.
Put and for . These are well-defined derivations of , and , with for . Any product of such derivations is zero: each factor raises the degree of a nonconstant monomial by at least one and kills constants. Thus is a finite sum for . The repeated Leibniz identity implies that is an algebra automorphism, with inverse . Its image of has coefficient in degree , plus a polynomial in , since a product of at least two derivations contributing to that degree has positive indices summing to . Recursive coefficient comparison therefore gives unique for each , polynomial in . The substitution operator consequently equals .
On , lowers weight by , so for and every product of positive modes vanishes. Define the linear map . It reverses brackets: . This follows on basis elements from the commutators, including the zero terms when , and extends by bilinearity.
We prove integration of this map directly. The coefficients identify with . Along any piecewise smooth path starting at the identity, set . Differentiating the multiplicativity of shows that is a derivation. It raises monomial degree and hence equals : a derivation is determined by its value on , which lies in . Define by , . This equation has the explicit solution . Differentiation verifies the equation; the same finite iteration applied to the difference of two solutions proves uniqueness.
This solution depends only on the endpoint. Indeed, take a smooth fixed-endpoint homotopy and set , , . Differentiating inverses gives , and therefore . The defect satisfies by substitution and this last identity. At , and , so there; uniqueness gives throughout. At , , so . Any two smooth paths with the same endpoints are joined by their linear interpolation in the coefficient coordinates ; piecewise smooth paths can be reparametrized with vanishing derivatives at joins and the argument applied to the pieces. The iterated-integral solution justifies every parameter differentiation here, without any analytic ODE existence theorem.
Write the resulting endpoint operator as . For , first follow a path from the identity to , then the path to obtained from a path by . Substitution reverses composition, so and its left logarithmic derivative is exactly . The second segment consequently transports to . Endpoint independence proves . Along the path , its substitution is , so and the explicit solution is . Thus as stated.
The exponential formula and the triangular polynomial recursion prove polynomial dependence on the jet coefficients. Restricting from kills and leaves all other positive modes unchanged; coefficients with depend only on the corresponding truncated jet. Thus restrictions agree. All arguments use finite sums, finite-dimensional matrices, explicit polynomial recursions and finite integrals, so require neither convergence of the infinite vector field nor any additional choice axiom.