How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Circle Fourier GMC positive and inverse moments
Statement
For , the exact Fourier measures in the radial data converge almost surely weakly to a finite positive Radon measure . Its mass is strictly positive almost surely, , and for every the masses converge to in , uniformly bounded in that norm. Every inverse moment , , is finite. For each fixed finite oscillator projection , both and are bounded into ; their constants may depend on .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Exactly the parameters, concrete Gaussian/vertex conventions and weighted-domain conditions in the Statement.
Radial Hilbert-space data and Liouville Hamiltonian: the exact Fourier Gaussian coordinates, Hermite basis, cutoff circle measures and total masses.
Positive functionals on are integration against a Radon measure: for the compact Hausdorff circle , each positive real-linear functional on is integration against its finite representing Radon measure, whose mass is the functional evaluated at .
Proof
C1. The covariance and the comparison calculation. cos(nt)/n. Uniformly for , .
For this follows by subtracting , since N²t². For N|t|>1 use the convergent sum and summation by parts on its tail: geometric partial sums are bounded by 1/|sin(t/2)|, giving tail bound C/(N|t|). Adjusting C covers and circle distance near pi.
Here is the Gaussian comparison used below, including its direction. For finite Gaussian vectors X,Y whose covariances satisfy for every pair, independent interpolation sqrt(1−s)X+sqrt(s)Y and Gaussian integration by parts give d/ds E = (gamma²/2) .
This follows by differentiating the Gaussian density (or by integrating the one-variable identity E[Zg(Z)]=E[g'(Z)] successively); the diagonal first-derivative terms cancel exactly against the variance normalization. Thus convex F gives E , and concave F reverses the inequality. Riemann sums pass to the continuous finite-N fields by continuity. Powers , , are obtained by replacing x with x+delta and then decreasing delta to zero; F(x)=exp(−t x) needs no truncation. Adding an independent common Gaussian of variance C multiplies a qth moment by exp(gamma² C(q²−q)/2).
For an interval of length with , rescale it to a unit interval. The covariance estimate gives for .
The constant in step 5.1 is independent of . Add a common Gaussian of variance to the actual field; its covariance then dominates that of the comparison field. Concave Gaussian comparison and the common-Gaussian moment factor bound the th moment by a constant times the rescaled unit-interval mass moment. Jensen bounds that moment by one, giving , where for . (1)
All covariance comparisons concern entries, not positive-semidefinite ordering of their difference. The interpolation proof requires precisely this entrywise condition. Neither an independence assertion for actual disjoint arcs nor exact scale invariance of the Fourier field is used.
C2. Uniform positive moments and the actual measure limit. Put with . The elementary exponential tilt of the joint Gaussian density gives = dx.
Divide the y-integral into dyadic shells about x down to radius comparable to 1/N and the remaining ball. Concavity gives . On a shell of radius the covariance estimate bounds the tilt by C , while (1) bounds the qth mass moment by C . The same estimate holds for the final radius 1/N ball. The resulting geometric series is bounded uniformly in N because .
The finitely many macroscopic arcs only change its constant. Thus for the entire specified p range.
The Fourier modes are independent across n, and their normalized exponential has conditional mean one. Hence for every bounded nonnegative deterministic g, integral g is a nonnegative martingale. The preceding bound and domination by ||g||infinity give uniform integrability and boundedness. Martingale convergence can be proved directly by the usual upcrossing inequality: buy at a and sell at b for successive crossings, conditional mean-zero increments bound expected completed gains, hence each rational interval has finitely many crossings; boundedness in excludes an infinite limit. Conditional Jensen and uniform integrability identify the limit's conditional expectations, and the standard tail truncation plus convergence in probability proves convergence (alternatively apply the upcrossing argument to the uniformly -bounded martingale and its conditional limit).
Apply this simultaneously to a countable uniformly dense real trigonometric-polynomial family containing the constant . On the resulting probability-one set, convergence on the dense family and bounded total masses extend the limits by uniform approximation to a bounded positive real-linear functional on . Since is compact Hausdorff, ; [F2] represents by a finite positive Radon measure , with . Uniform approximation then gives for every continuous , so the measures converge weakly. The total mass has by the convergence in step 11.1, and it has the stated positive moments. This constructs the exact Fourier circle datum required in the radial Hamiltonian.
C3. A two-arc comparison, positivity, and negative moments. Fix two disjoint closed arcs of length 2pi r with sufficiently small, separated by positive distance. For x,y in different arcs is bounded above uniformly in N. Parameterize each arc by theta, . Within one arc the covariance estimate gives .
The inequality also holds when theta−theta' is close to 2pi: the rescaled periodic covariance increases there and so is an upper bound; away from the two endpoints it is just the preceding logarithmic estimate. The finitely many N with are irrelevant for taking limits. Choose a common Gaussian Z of variance , increasing C if necessary. Let be independent Fourier fields with cutoff floor(Nr), independent of Z. Their copies plus Z dominate the actual covariance entrywise on the union of the two arcs (cross covariance of the model is A). The convex comparison for exp(−t x), followed by the already established convergence, gives for phi(t)=E exp(−tV) phi(t) E[phi(t B)^2], exp(gamma Z−gamma² A/2)>0. (2)
Indeed V is at least the sum of the actual arc masses; the model arc masses are B times two independent copies of V. This is a comparison inequality, not a false independence/scaling identity for the actual arc masses.
Let t tend to infinity in (2). With , dominated convergence gives . Since E V=2pi and V is finite, a cannot be one. Therefore , so phi(t)->0.
For every , the lognormal lower tail gives for all sufficiently large .
Put . Splitting the expectation in (2) on the event yields . (3)
Choose epsilon small and with . Since psi tends to zero, choose a large initial interval [(1−epsilon)S,S] where and then small enough that there. Enlarging S and decreasing if necessary makes the Gaussian error at most for . Induction on intervals [S(1−epsilon)^{-m},S(1−epsilon)^{-m−1}] using (3) proves exp(−b (log t)^delta), . (4)
The strict inequality absorbs the squared term, and the exponent in the Gaussian error exceeds . Tonelli's theorem and the elementary gamma integral give, for every , by (4).
These inverse moments are the tail control used at the confining end of the scattering argument.
C4. Finite oscillator channels. Every fixed finite Hermite polynomial belongs to every finite of the Gaussian law. Holder therefore gives for some epsilon'>0 whenever a particular finite r is needed, by choosing epsilon' below the positive-moment margin and the complementary Gaussian exponent appropriately. The inverse moments similarly give . For a finite oscillator projection , both and are bounded operators into L². Constants depend on K; no uniform-in-K polynomial estimate is asserted or needed.