Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Conformal subalgebra in the kernel of v(0)

Statement

In the explicit rank-one square-zero lattice data with integer p≥2, set ω=(x124p+p−12px2)1,v=e−α/p,Q=(eα)(0):A→A,F=e−α,H=QF,E=Q2F. The field Y(ω,z)=∑nL(n)z−n−2 on the algebra A and its module M satisfies the Virasoro relations with c=1−6(p−1)2/p, L(−1)=T on A, and weight operator L(0)(fetα)=(∑k≥1kxk∂xk+pt2−(p−1)t)fetα. In this statement, a nonzero state u∈A is primary of weight Δ if L(0)u=Δu and L(n)u=0 for every n>0. Its restriction to VL is a conformal vertex algebra of CFT type. Both eα and v are primary of weight one, so their zero modes commute with Virasoro. The operator Q preserves every L(0)-eigenspace and is a derivation of all state products on A, meaning that for every a,b∈A and k∈Z, Q(a(k)b)=(Qa)(k)b+a(k)(Qb). It restricts to VL and obeys Qω=0, QF=H, QH=E, QE=0. The three states F,H,E are primary of weight 2p−1.

Let W be the smallest linear subspace of VL containing 1,ω,F,H,E and closed under every product a(k)b, k∈Z, of its elements. Then W is a conformal vertex subalgebra of CFT type, is preserved by Q, and is contained in ker⁡VLv(0). The same ambient ordinary fields restrict to actual W-module actions on the lattice sectors above. This statement does not assert strong generation, equality with an entire screening kernel, endpoint simplicity or any extension theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The square-zero lattice data, integer p≥2, and definitions in the Statement.

[F1]

Explicit rank-one square-zero lattice fields gives all oscillator, exponential and normal-order formulas.

[F2]

Jacobi identities for the rank-one square-zero lattice extension proves the full adjoint and module Jacobi identities and translation formula for these actual fields. Their residues give [a(0),Y(b,z)]=Y(a(0)b,z) and the same module identity.

[F3]

Conformal vertex algebra of CFT type specifies the Virasoro, translation, finite weight-space and CFT-type requirements used for VL and W.

[F4]

Jacobi and residue calculus from the state-field locality axioms proves that homogeneous states of weights r,s have a(k)b of weight r+s−k−1 whenever it is nonzero.

[F5]

Exact lengths of boundary long-screening strings at i=0, n=1 gives Q2e−α≠0 for every integer p≥2. Its Qt is the restriction of the present Q to Ft: the exponential and substitution formulas in [F1] agree with the generic oscillator data, including scalar cocycle one.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

Put q=(p−1)/(2p). The field of ω is T(z)=:α(z)2:/(4p)+q∂zα(z). The oscillator contraction α(z)α(w)∼2p/(z−w)2 gives T(z)T(w)∼(1/2−12pq2)/(z−w)4+2T(w)/(z−w)2+∂wT(w)/(z−w). Specifically the double quadratic contraction is 1/2 in fourth order; the two improvement terms give q2∂z∂w(2p/(z−w)2)=−12pq2/(z−w)4; the mixed cubic poles cancel and their remaining poles are 2q∂α(w)/(z−w)2+q∂2α(w)/(z−w). The quadratic single contractions give the remaining quadratic part and its derivative. Taking residues using [F2] proves the Virasoro relations and the displayed central charge. The modes are L(n)=14p∑j∈Z:αjαn−j:−q(n+1)αn. At n=−1 the improvement term vanishes. Pairing the terms with indices j=m and j=−m−1 for m≥0 gives L(−1)=12p(α−1α0+∑m≥1α−m−1αm). On Ft this acts as tx1+∑m≥1mxm+1∂xm, precisely the translation T in [F1] and [F2]. At n=0 the mode formula gives the weight operator in the Statement. On VL its vacuum-charge weights are pn2−(p−1)n, nonnegative integers with equality only at n=0. Every weight space is finite because this quadratic bounds the charges, and the polynomial space in each remaining oscillator degree has the finite partition basis. Thus VL has all properties in [F3].

2.1F1F2F5step 1.1algebra

The same single/double contractions with an exponential of charge t give T(z)Et(w)∼(pt2−(p−1)t)Et(w)/(z−w)2+∂wEt(w)/(z−w). The double quadratic contraction contributes pt2, the improvement contributes −(p−1)t, and the single quadratic contraction contributes t:αEt:=∂Et by differentiating its explicit exponential formula. Thus the corresponding vacuum states are primary of the given weights. In particular eα and v have weight one, while F has weight 2p−1. For a weight-one primary a, the residues give [L(n),Y(a,z)]=∂z(zn+1Y(a,z)), whose zero-mode residue is zero. Both screenings therefore commute with every L(n). Since Q1=0 and ω=L(−2)1, this implies Qω=0. The zero-mode identities in [F2] make Q and v(0) derivations of every state product, with Q restricting to VL. By [F5] with i=0, n=1, E=Q2F≠0; hence H=QF≠0, since otherwise QH=E would vanish. The state F=e−α is itself a nonzero constant polynomial in its labelled Fock space. Commuting Q with Virasoro supplies the weight and positive-mode equations for H,E; together with this nonvanishing, all three states are primary in the stated nonzero sense. Moreover QE=Q3F would have charge 2α and weight 2p−1, but that charge has minimum weight 2p+2. Hence QE=0.

3.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Directly Y(v,z)ω is obtained by substituting x1+2z−1 and x2+2z−2 into x12/(4p)+qx2, followed by multiplication by the creation exponential. Before that multiplication the result is ω+(x1/p)z−1+z−2, while the exponential begins 1−(x1/p)z+⋯. Thus v(0)ω=0, v(1)ω=v and v(n)ω=0 for n≥2. Also Y(v,z)F begins with z2, so v(0)F=0. The explicit exponentials give Qv=x1e(1−1/p)α=pp−1Te(1−1/p)α. By [F2], [Q,v(0)]=(Qv)(0)=0, since a derivative has zero zero-mode residue. Hence v(0)H=v(0)E=0. The derivation property makes its kernel a vertex subalgebra containing all four generators, so it contains W. The Q table of step 2.1 and its derivation property imply QW⊂W. Each generator is homogeneous; [F4] shows that products of homogeneous states have the mode-weight rule, so the span generated by all their products is graded. It inherits finite weight spaces, nonnegative weights, the one-dimensional vacuum space, the Virasoro vector and translation from VL, so it has the properties in [F3]. Restricting the full module Jacobi identity of [F2] to this actual subalgebra supplies its ordinary module actions; no classification or endpoint claim is used.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources