Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Upper-semicircle imaginary-dilation identity on lowest-weight vectors

Statement

Let U be a positive-energy unitary Möbius representation and write Hfin=span⁡alg{ker⁡(L0−λI):λ∈[0,∞)} for the algebraic span of its rotation eigenspaces. On this domain, suppose the generators satisfy [L0,L±1]=∓L±1,[L1,L−1]=2L0. The adjoint convention on Hfin is the form identity ⟨Lnξ,η⟩=⟨ξ,L−nη⟩ for n=−1,0,1 and ξ,η∈Hfin. Let a∈Hfin be a quasiprimary vector of integral weight d∈Z≥0, meaning L0a=da and L1a=0. The cyclic lowest-weight subspace generated by a is Ha=span⁡‾{L−1na:n≥0}; all vectors and operators in the remainder of the Statement are restricted to this subspace. Let K be the self-adjoint generator normalized by K=iπ(L1−L−1) on the finite-energy domain. Thus the integrated real group eitK is already part of the supplied unitary Möbius representation; no assertion about the modular operator of any algebra is made here.

Use the Fourier convention f^m=12π∫02πf(eit)e−imt dt,a(f)=∑n≥0f^−n−dL−1nan!. For arbitrary complex-valued f∈Cc∞({eit:0<t<π}), extended by zero to the circle, the conclusion is a(f)∈Dom⁡(eK/2),eK/2a(f)=(−1)da(f∘j),j(z)=z−1. Here f∘j is supported in the lower semicircle. In particular this is a linear identity, not an antilinear reflection identity; no complex conjugation of f is inserted.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The linked suppliers have their exact declared mathematical scope; the argument below reconstructs the additional claim locally. Möbius and conformal nets on the circle, Quasi-primary translation series converges in the Hilbert space. The unbounded Borel functional calculus defines the spectral cutoffs ER and the operators esK, including their exact domains, used below. Unbounded Borel functional calculus: domains, products, spectral mapping

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice, the hypothesis used by the unbounded Borel functional calculus supplier. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

Given: [A1] and exactly the data and hypotheses in the Statement. All Hilbert inner products are linear in the first argument.

1.1givenF1algebra

The data are: Exactly the unitary lowest-weight representation, self-adjoint generator, Fourier convention and compact upper-semicircle support just specified. The quasi-primary supplier [F1], proof steps 1.1, 2.1, and 3.1, proves that every finite-energy vector of this genuine positive-energy Möbius representation is Möbius smooth, without any finite-multiplicity hypothesis. In particular a and all its L−1 descendants are in the common smooth domain, so the ladder and adjoint calculations beginning in 2.1 have their required domains.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra

The zero-vector case is immediate. If d=0, then ∥L−1a∥2=⟨a,L1L−1a⟩=2d∥a∥2=0. Hence L−1a=L1a=0, Ka=0 and a(f)=f^0a. Since f∘j^0=f^0, the asserted identity follows. Suppose henceforth d>0 and put m=2d. Repeated use of the Lie relations gives the mutually orthogonal vectors vn=L−1na/n! with ∥vn∥2=∥a∥2(m)nn!,(m)n=m(m+1)⋯(m+n−1). Indeed L1L−1na=n(2d+n−1)L−1n−1a, and induction gives this norm formula. Fourier coefficients of a smooth circle function decay faster than any power, whereas (m)n/n! grows polynomially of degree m−1, so both a(f) and a(f∘j) converge in Hilbert norm.

3.1givenF1step 2.1algebra

For ∣z∣<1 define the coherent vector v(z)=∑n≥0znvn. Its series converges normally in Hilbert norm on compact subdisks and the binomial series gives ⟨v(z),v(w)⟩=∥a∥2(1−zwˉ)−m. The ladder relations also give, as Hilbert-vector identities, L−1v(z)=∂zv(z),L1v(z)=(z2∂z+2dz)v(z). These are genuine domain identities: truncating the power series, the images under each ladder operator converge in Hilbert norm, since the additional ladder coefficients are polynomial in n and ∣z∣n decays exponentially. Closedness of the representation generators therefore puts v(z) in their domains; the same estimates apply uniformly on every compact subdisk. In particular v(z)∈Dom⁡K with the displayed generator action.

4.1givenF1step 3.1algebra

For 0<s<1/2, set cs=cos⁡(πs),hs=sin⁡(πs),As(z)=cs−ihsz,Ns(z)=csz−ihs,gs(z)=Ns(z)As(z). For z=eit in the upper semicircle, ∣As(z)∣2=1+sin⁡(2πs)sin⁡t,∣Ns(z)∣2=1−sin⁡(2πs)sin⁡t. Hence ∣gs(z)∣<1 and As(z)≠0. Define a Hilbert-valued Bochner integral vs=12π∫0πf(eit)eidtAs(eit)−mv(gs(eit)) dt. For s in a compact subinterval of (0,1/2) and t in the compact support of f, the transformed points belong to a fixed compact subdisk. Step 3.1 therefore justifies the integral, its norm derivatives in s, and integration in the graph norm of K.

5.1givenF1step 4.1algebra

Differentiate the explicit functions: ∂sgs=iπ(gs2−1),∂s(As−m)=2diπgsAs−m. Using step 3.1 in the integrand yields the exact local differential equation ddsvs=Kvs(0<s<1/2). This equation has not yet been identified with an unbounded exponential at the endpoints; that identification will follow from a uniform norm bound and spectral cutoffs below.

6.1givenF1step 5.1algebra

We now prove the required uniform Hardy bound directly. Put q=sin⁡(2πs)>0 and r=cos⁡(2πs), so q2+r2=1. The coherent kernel in step 3.1 gives ∥vs∥2=∥a∥2(2π)2∬f(eit)f(eiu)‾eid(t−u)(As(eit)As(eiu)‾−Ns(eit)Ns(eiu)‾)m dt du. Direct multiplication, with z=eit,w=eiu, gives As(z)As(w)‾−Ns(z)Ns(w)‾=2ei(t−u)/2(qsin⁡t+u2−irsin⁡t−u2). Since m=2d, its phase cancels the numerator phase exactly. In the real coordinates x=tan⁡(t/2)>0, y=tan⁡(u/2)>0, put F(x)=f(e2iarctan⁡x)(1+x2)d−1. Compact upper-semicircle support means F∈Cc∞(0,∞). The identities for the sine of the sum/difference of arctangents and dt=2 dx/(1+x2) then give ∥vs∥2=∥a∥22mπ2∬F(x)F(y)‾(q(x+y)−ir(x−y))m dx dy. All integrals here are ordinary convergent integrals for fixed 0<s<1/2.

7.1givenF1step 6.1algebra

The elementary Laplace identity z−m=Γ(m)−1∫0∞um−1e−uz du, valid for Re⁡z>0, gives ∥vs∥2=∥a∥22mπ2Γ(m)∫0∞um−1∣∫0∞F(x)e−u(q−ir)x dx∣2du. For fixed q>0, Fubini is justified absolutely by the positive lower bound on x+y on the compact support; the Laplace identity itself follows by m−1 integrations by parts from the exponential integral and holomorphy in the right half-plane. Crucially ∣q−ir∣=1. Integrating by parts N times in the inner integral, with no boundary terms because F is compactly supported inside (0,∞), proves ∣∫F(x)e−u(q−ir)x dx∣≤∥F∥1(0<u≤1),∣∫F(x)e−u(q−ir)x dx∣≤u−N∥F(N)∥1(u≥1). The estimate ∣e−uqx∣≤1 uses x>0. Choosing N>d proves the explicit bound sup⁡0<s<1/2∥vs∥2≤∥a∥22mπ2Γ(m)(∥F∥12m+∥F(N)∥122N−m)<∞. This is uniform at BOTH endpoints and does not appeal to a boundary distribution kernel theorem.

8.1givenF1step 7.1algebra

For each fixed n, the coefficient of vn in vs is bn(s)=12π∫f(eit)eidtAs(eit)−mgs(eit)n dt. Since ∣As(eit)∣≥1 on the support, these finite coefficients have the endpoint limits obtained by direct bounded convergence. At s=0, A0=1 and g0(z)=z, so bn(0)=f^−n−d. At s=1/2, A1/2(z)=−iz and g1/2(z)=z−1, so bn(1/2)=(−i)−2d12π∫f(eit)e−i(n+d)t dt=(−1)df∘j^−n−d. The spans of the vn are dense in the cyclic subrepresentation. Together with the uniform norm bound and the Hilbert convergence established in step 2.1, these coefficient limits imply vs⇀a(f)(s↓0),vs⇀(−1)da(f∘j)(s↑1/2). This also fixes the phase without an independent choice of square-root or a suppressed antilinear reflection: the multiplier is precisely (−iz)−2d and the external density factor is zd.

9.1givenF1step 8.1algebra∎

Let ER=1[−R,R](K). By step 5.1, ERvs solves the bounded-generator equation (ERvs)′=KERvs. Therefore e−sKERvs is constant on (0,1/2), where the exponent is restricted to ERH and is bounded. Taking its weak initial limit using step 8.1 gives ERvs=esKERa(f). Letting R→∞, the uniform finite bound on ∥vs∥ proves a(f)∈Dom⁡(esK) and vs=esKa(f) for every 0<s<1/2, by the spectral theorem. Finally, if μ is the K-spectral measure of a(f), Fatou's lemma gives ∫Reλ dμ(λ)≤lim inf⁡s↑1/2∫Re2sλ dμ(λ)≤sup⁡0<s<1/2∥vs∥2<∞. Hence a(f)∈Dom⁡(eK/2). Spectral dominated convergence also gives esKa(f)→eK/2a(f) strongly: on positive spectrum use the integrable majorant eλ, and on negative spectrum use one. Comparing with the weak final limit in step 8.1 proves eK/2a(f)=(−1)da(f∘j). This is the full asserted domain and vector identity for every allowed complex test function.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources