How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The vector triple product identity
Statement
For all ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Vectors with coordinates , , .
The cross product is defined coordinatewise by (The cross product in ).
The Euclidean inner product is (The Euclidean inner product on ).
Finite sums may be expanded, reordered and combined (Laws of finite sums and finite products).
Proof
First component. By [L1], which expands to ; since and by [L2], this equals , which is the -component of the asserted identity.
Second and third components. The same computation, with the coordinate labels cyclically relabelled and the components of the cross product read off in the corresponding cyclic order, gives and : each is the same finite expansion of [L1] as in step 1.1 with cyclically replaced, and [L2], [L3] are unaffected by the relabelling.
Two vectors of with equal components are equal, so steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove the identity in all three coordinates.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- David Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge), §1.1, printed pp. 1-2: the vector triple product and the orthonormality identities for the cross product
- Richard Fitzpatrick, Newtonian Dynamics (University of Texas at Austin), §2.5 and Appendix A: vector identities for the cross product, including the triple product rule