How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cm Math Central
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cm Math Balances
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Convergence: Nets and Filters
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Equivalent Forms of Completeness
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Probability and the Probabilistic Method
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Further Trigonometric Identities and Inverse Functions
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper and Parameter-Dependent Multiple Integrals
- Improper Integrals
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Orthonormal Bases, Parseval and Fourier Series
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Regular Surfaces and Surface Integrals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Real Gamma and Beta Functions
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Volumes of Elementary Solids and Solids of Revolution
2 · Summary
The central-force layer of the non-relativistic classical mechanics collection,
all of it mathematics: the reduction of the non-radial central-force equation to
polar data, the Kepler problem up to the determination of its conic, period and
one-dimensional action variable, and the finite-range and Coulomb scattering
layer with its cross-section densities. Every item on this page carries
domain: mathematics and depends only on mathematical suppliers; nothing here
asserts that the equations describe a physical interaction, that incident flux
is realized by counted events, or that any empirical conclusion follows. The
physical reading of masses, forces, energies and scattering measurements
remains with the consuming classical-mechanics pages.
The reduction layer begins with Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential, which defines the central-force equation for a curve with values in , together with the angular momentum vector , the energy and the effective potential . Local polar coordinates for a curve with nonvanishing position in the plane: a differentiable angle function with prescribed derivative supplies local polar coordinates of a planar curve as a twice differentiable rotation, and Conservation of the angular momentum vector along a central-force trajectory and its orthogonality to position and velocity proves that is constant and orthogonal to and . Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: , the effective-potential equation and energy conservation then derives the polar identities , the radial equation and the conserved energy . Circular orbits of a non-radial central-force trajectory: the critical-point condition and the squared frequency of the linearised radial equation characterises circular orbits by , exhibits them explicitly, and reduces the linearised radial equation to the constant-coefficient oscillator, whose solutions are classified by Solutions of are exactly the functions . The Kepler specialization proceeds through Binet's equation for the attractive inverse-square field: for , which derives for along the angular variable, and The Kepler orbit equation is a conic: with , which proves and the exact relation connecting the sign of the energy with the eccentricity. The algebraic prerequisites The vector triple product identity and Oriented orthonormal triads in : existence over any unit vector, and the orthonormal expansion with no fourth orthogonal direction are proved locally: the first is the vector triple product identity, the second constructs an oriented orthonormal triad over any unit vector and proves that no four orthonormal vectors exist in , together with the orthonormal expansion.
The Kepler layer proper is The subcritical Kepler conic is an ellipse with semiaxes , , focus at the origin and area ; its area is also , which proves that the subcritical conic is the ellipse with centre and semiaxes , , with area ; the item declares the Axiom of Countable Choice used by its affine change-of-variables and polar-decomposition arguments. Completeness and periodicity of the negative-energy Kepler orbit, with and proves completeness of the negative-energy orbit, the periodicity of the motion and the exact period value , hence ; it also declares the Axiom of Countable Choice. The one-dimensional action layer is The one-dimensional action variable of a family of two-turning-point energy levels, which defines for a two-simple-turning-point family, and The action variable of a two-simple-turning-point family is with derivative , the period quadrature over , which proves that the action variable is with by the inverse function theorem at the turning points, a endpoint rescaling and differentiation under the integral sign.
The measure part of the scattering layer assumes countable choice. The scattering layer is built on Scattering data: the incident flux measure, the solid-angle element, deflection branches and the cross-section density, which defines the finite-range data, the incident flux measure , the solid-angle measure , deflection branches and their cross-section density as abstract measures and functions; no counting of events and no empirical claim belongs to the definition. Finite-range scattering: the simple outer turning point, the two global branches and the free tails assumes a simple outer turning point and proves the two unique global branches with free tails, Existence of the asymptotic velocities and the impact-parameter identity constructs the asymptotic velocities and the impact-parameter identity , and The scattering angle advance and the deflection relation: the total polar advance is and the velocity directions make the cosine proves the advance quadrature and the deflection relation modulo whole revolutions. One-dimensional substitution on a deflection branch: the outgoing angular measure has density , hence cross-section density performs the one-dimensional substitution on compact interior intervals and a Borel measure-uniqueness argument, giving the full open-branch pushforward identity for nonnegative or absolutely integrable Borel test functions and the outgoing angular measure density and the cross-section density , additively over finitely many disjoint branches. Repulsive Coulomb scattering: the unique outer turning point, global non-colliding motion, the asymptotic impact distance and separately treats the long-range the repulsive Coulomb potential, where the effective potential is strictly decreasing with a single simple turning point and the motion is global and non-colliding, with genuine asymptotic velocity and impact-distance limits and angle advance ; finally The Rutherford deflection map, its inverse, the cross-section density and the divergence of the total cross-section proves, for fixed energy and , the deflection map , its inverse , the density and the divergence of the total cross-section at forward angles together with finiteness over every compact angular interval. The companion page cm-math-central-examples records exact finite checks of the action derivative, of the Kepler ellipse data and of the Rutherford density, and a zero-angular-momentum collision counterexample that marks the excluded radial degenerate case.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential
Definition
Let be a real number, let be an open interval, let be of class ( Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms), let be an interval with at least two points (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length), and let be twice differentiable with for every (The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral). The curve is a central-force trajectory for when
where is the Euclidean norm (The Euclidean inner product on ) and is the derivative of on the open interval .
Attached objects. The angular momentum vector of such a trajectory is the curve ,
with the cross product of (The cross product in ); its energy is the function ,
and for every the effective potential of momentum magnitude is the function ,
Why the objects are defined. Since throughout , the right-hand side of the central-force equation is defined, the map is on (a quotient of functions with nowhere vanishing denominator), and is again ; in particular second derivatives of are available. The vector is defined for every because is differentiable there.
Mathematical status. The data , and are real numbers and functions; the equation and the attached objects are mathematical statements about curves. Nothing here asserts that the equation describes a physical interaction, and the names are conventional labels for the mathematical objects only.
Local polar coordinates for a curve with nonvanishing position in the plane: a differentiable angle function with prescribed derivative
Statement
Let be an interval with at least two points (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length), let , and let be twice differentiable with for every . Here twice differentiable means that and its derivative are differentiable at every point of in the domain-relative sense of The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set; , including one-sided limits at included endpoints. Put
Then there is a twice differentiable with
and every twice differentiable with and on satisfies
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An interval with at least two points, a point , and twice differentiable functions with on .
The function is twice differentiable with : the square root is the inverse of the square on , whose derivative does not vanish there, the inverse-function rule gives for , and the chain rule gives (Derivative of an inverse: if is continuous and injective on a nondegenerate interval and differentiable at with , then the inverse is differentiable at with ; and if then is not differentiable at , The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Sine and cosine are differentiable with and , so with the chain and product rules the functions , and their difference are differentiated by the ordinary product rule (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
is a bijection from onto the unit circle , and ( is a bijection from onto the real unit circle, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine).
A continuous function on the interval has a primitive: for fixed the function is differentiable on with (Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive ); sums, products and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous (Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function, Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point).
A function continuous on with vanishing derivative at every interior point of is constant on (A function continuous on an interval whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of is constant on ; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant).
Proof
By [L1], is differentiable with . Since are twice differentiable and , this quotient is differentiable by the product and quotient rules; hence is twice differentiable.
The vector satisfies by the definition of , so by [L3] there is a real with and .
Define by . The numerator is continuous and is continuous, so is continuous on by [L4]; hence by [L4] the function is differentiable on with . Moreover is differentiable by the product and quotient rules, since are twice differentiable and ; therefore is twice differentiable with .
Define and on . Evaluating at with the choice of and [L3] gives and .
Put on . Differentiating with [L2] and substituting gives the two identities and : indeed , and , using [L1]. Hence
By the quotient rule of [L2] and from [L1], The functions and are continuous on ; by [L5] and step 2.2 they are the constants and : and on .
Solving the two equations and for gives and on : the displayed linear system has the invertible coefficient matrix of determinant .
Let be twice differentiable with , . Differentiating the two identities and eliminating gives so on .
Solutions of are exactly the functions
Statement
Let , let be an interval with at least two points (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length), let , and let be twice differentiable with
Here twice differentiable means that and are differentiable at every point of in the domain-relative sense of The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set; , with one-sided limits at included endpoints.
Then there are reals with
Conversely, for all reals the function is twice differentiable on and satisfies there.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real , an interval with at least two points, a point , and a twice differentiable with on .
Sine and cosine are differentiable with and ; the chain rule differentiates the compositions , with derivatives and (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with ).
Sums, products and constant multiples of differentiable functions are differentiable with the usual rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
A function continuous on whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of is constant on (A function continuous on an interval whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of is constant on ; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant).
identically (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine).
Proof
Write and define on . Every factor is differentiable (including , by the twice differentiable hypothesis), so and are differentiable by [L2].
Differentiating and using : and likewise on .
By [L3] and step 1.2 there are reals with and on .
Multiplying out and using [L4], on ; hence , which is the asserted representation.
Conversely, if , then [L1] and [L2] give and on , so .
The vector triple product identity
Statement
For all ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Vectors with coordinates , , .
The cross product is defined coordinatewise by (The cross product in ).
The Euclidean inner product is (The Euclidean inner product on ).
Finite sums may be expanded, reordered and combined (Laws of finite sums and finite products).
Proof
First component. By [L1], which expands to ; since and by [L2], this equals , which is the -component of the asserted identity.
Second and third components. The same computation, with the coordinate labels cyclically relabelled and the components of the cross product read off in the corresponding cyclic order, gives and : each is the same finite expansion of [L1] as in step 1.1 with cyclically replaced, and [L2], [L3] are unaffected by the relabelling.
Two vectors of with equal components are equal, so steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove the identity in all three coordinates.
Oriented orthonormal triads in : existence over any unit vector, and the orthonormal expansion with no fourth orthogonal direction
Statement
Call a triple of vectors of an oriented orthonormal triad when for all and . Then:
- Existence. For every with there are such that is an oriented orthonormal triad.
- Dimension bound. Every orthonormal list (pairwise orthogonal unit vectors) has ; consequently, for every oriented orthonormal triad and every ,
Throughout, and are the Euclidean inner product and norm (The Euclidean inner product on ), is the cross product (The cross product in ), and is the standard basis of (The standard list with and for is an ordered basis of ; hence , and is the zero space with basis and dimension ).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A unit vector , standard basis vectors , and arbitrary orthonormal lists as in the statement.
The triple product identity holds for all (The vector triple product identity ).
The cross product is bilinear and alternating and is orthogonal to both factors; and (The cross product is bilinear, alternating, and orthogonal to both factors, The squared cross-product norm is the Gram determinant of two vectors, The Euclidean inner product on ).
Relabel the standard basis indexed in the supplier as . This basis is orthonormal: , and every is with , by the coordinate definition of the Euclidean inner product and the standard basis (The standard list with and for is an ordered basis of ; hence , and is the zero space with basis and dimension , The Euclidean inner product on ).
Bessel's inequality: for an orthonormal family in an inner product space (Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument, Orthogonal vectors and subspaces, orthogonal and orthonormal sets, and orthonormal bases) and every vector , (The Bessel inequality for an arbitrary orthonormal family).
Finite sums may be reordered and combined (Laws of finite sums and finite products); and two distinct standard basis vectors are not parallel, since they have distinct, nonvanishing coordinates.
Proof
At most one standard basis vector is parallel to : if and with and , then , which is false because and have in different coordinates. Hence some with not parallel to exists.
Let be orthonormal, and suppose . Applying Bessel's inequality [L4] to each standard basis vector gives . Summing over and exchanging the finite sums [L5] gives .
Put . Then : otherwise is parallel to , contrary to step 1.1. Set . Then and , because and .
For each , the standard-basis expansion of [L3] applied to gives . Hence the left-hand side of step 1.2 equals , contradicting the bound of step 1.2. Therefore no orthonormal list in has four or more members.
Set . By [L2], and ; and by the triple product identity [L1]. So is an oriented orthonormal triad, which is clause 1.
Let be an oriented orthonormal triad and . Put . Then for each , by bilinearity of the inner product. If , then would be four pairwise orthogonal unit vectors, contradicting step 2.2; hence , which is the expansion.
With the expansion in hand, by bilinearity and orthonormality. This completes clause 2.
Conservation of the angular momentum vector along a central-force trajectory and its orthogonality to position and velocity
Statement
Let , let be an open interval, let be of class , let be an interval with at least two points, and let be a central-force trajectory for with angular momentum vector (Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential). Then:
- is differentiable on with for every ; hence is constant on ;
- for every , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A central-force trajectory for on an interval with at least two points.
For differentiable curves the cross product is differentiable with ; moreover sums, and scalar multiples of curves, differentiate by the usual rules (Differentiation of sums, scalar multiples, inner products, cross products and squared norms of differentiable curves in ).
The cross product is bilinear and alternating, so and , ; orthogonality means vanishing Euclidean inner product (The cross product is bilinear, alternating, and orthogonal to both factors, The cross product in , The Euclidean inner product on ).
If is differentiable with integrable , then (If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz, Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).
Proof
By [L1] the curve is differentiable with
Substituting [L2] and using alternation [L3],
Let with . Then [L4] applied to gives ; since is the zero curve by step 2.1, the integral vanishes and . As were arbitrary, is constant on .
For every , [L3] gives and : the cross product is orthogonal to each factor.
Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: , the effective-potential equation and energy conservation
Statement
Let , let be an open interval, let be of class , let be an interval with at least two points, and let be a central-force trajectory for whose angular momentum is a nonzero constant vector (Conservation of the angular momentum vector along a central-force trajectory and its orthogonality to position and velocity); write . Let be an oriented orthonormal triad with (Oriented orthonormal triads in : existence over any unit vector, and the orthonormal expansion with no fourth orthogonal direction).
Then there are twice differentiable and with
and for every such pair :
- for all ;
- on , so ;
- the effective-potential equation holds on , with (Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential);
- equals and is constant on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A central-force trajectory for with constant nonzero angular momentum , , an oriented orthonormal triad , and twice differentiable with .
For the oriented orthonormal triad: every is and (Oriented orthonormal triads in : existence over any unit vector, and the orthonormal expansion with no fourth orthogonal direction).
The angular momentum is orthogonal to and to : and (Conservation of the angular momentum vector along a central-force trajectory and its orthogonality to position and velocity).
Polar lift: for twice differentiable with there is a twice differentiable angle function such that , with (Local polar coordinates for a curve with nonvanishing position in the plane: a differentiable angle function with prescribed derivative).
Differentiability rules: inner products and cross products of differentiable curves differentiate by the product rule, and ; the chain rule differentiates and with derivatives and ; sums, products and quotients with nonvanishing denominator differentiate by the usual rules (Differentiation of sums, scalar multiples, inner products, cross products and squared norms of differentiable curves in , The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Cross product rules: , , the product is bilinear, and are unit vectors (The cross product in , The cross product is bilinear, alternating, and orthogonal to both factors); (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine).
A function continuous on whose derivative vanishes at every interior point is constant on (A function continuous on an interval whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of is constant on ; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant, Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).
Proof
Put for ; these are twice differentiable by [L4]. They are never both zero: by [L1] and [L2], , so would give , contradicting .
Clause 1 for an arbitrary pair: if , then is computed by [L1] and [L5] as , hence .
Differentiating [L5]'s expansion with and by [L4] gives Here and by bilinearity of the cross product and .
Apply the polar lift [L3] to : there is a twice differentiable with , for ; by Parseval in [L1] and , , so is twice differentiable with values in . Substituting into the expansion of step 1.1 gives , so such a pair exists.
Clause 2: from step 1.3, so , giving and hence .
Clause 3: the trajectory equation is by clause 1. Comparing with the decomposition of step 1.3 and using the linear independence of and — their components in the orthonormal triad are distinct, so forces by taking inner products with and — the radial component gives Substituting from step 2.2 gives , because .
Clause 4, the energy identity: from step 1.3 and orthonormality, , so by step 2.2.
The right-hand side is differentiable on and its derivative is by step 3.1 (the equation holds at every point of ); hence is constant on by [L6].
Circular orbits of a non-radial central-force trajectory: the critical-point condition and the squared frequency of the linearised radial equation
Statement
Let , let be an open interval, let be of class , let be an interval with at least two points, and let be a central-force trajectory for with constant nonzero angular momentum , , and polar data as in Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: , the effective-potential equation and energy conservation, so that and on . Fix . Then:
- (Necessity.) If is constant on , then and is constant; the trajectory is the uniform rotation .
- (Existence.) Conversely, if , then for every the curve is a central-force trajectory for defined on , with angular momentum and constant energy .
- (Linearised radial equation.) Let be a solution of the reduced equation on with , and put . Then where as ; if moreover , then the associated linearised equation has exactly the solutions with and , for any . This is a statement about the quadratic radial approximation; no nonlinear stability of the circular orbit is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The central-force data with constant nonzero angular momentum and polar data from Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: , the effective-potential equation and energy conservation, a radius , and the functions , .
Polar reduction: with , , , and the energy is constant (Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: , the effective-potential equation and energy conservation).
Derivative rules: the chain rule, the product rule and the trigonometric derivatives , ; the cross product differentiates by the product rule; and and the cross product is bilinear (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, Differentiation of sums, scalar multiples, inner products, cross products and squared norms of differentiable curves in , Oriented orthonormal triads in : existence over any unit vector, and the orthonormal expansion with no fourth orthogonal direction).
; and for the linearised equation: the solutions of on an interval with are exactly (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, Solutions of are exactly the functions , Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).
The derivative of at is : for every there is with for (The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set, Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of , Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).
Proof
Clause 1: if then , so the reduced equation of [L1] gives ; and is constant by [L1].
Clause 2, the kinematics: for with , [L2] gives and ; hence and , using [L2] and [L3].
Clause 3, the remainder: by [L4] applied to at , for every there is with for , where and ; that is, . Substituting into the reduced equation of [L1] and expanding gives .
Clause 2, the equation of motion: from step 1.2 and , while ; the two agree because means . The energy is , and it is constant because the equation is satisfied and the trajectory is periodic; more directly it equals the constant right-hand side of clause 4 of [L1] along this motion.
Clause 3, the linearised solutions: if then and the linearised equation reads ; by [L3] its solutions on are exactly the displayed trigonometric functions for any .
Binet's equation for the attractive inverse-square field: for
Statement
Let , , let be (of class ), let be an interval with at least two points, and let be a central-force trajectory for with constant angular momentum , . Let be polar data as in Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: , the effective-potential equation and energy conservation, let be the interior of (a nonempty interval with at least two points, or empty if is a singleton, which is excluded), and put , an interval. Then:
- is a bijection with inverse of class , and the function is of class ;
- on , (derivatives with respect to the variable of );
- the auxiliary identity holds on ;
- the energy satisfies on , where is the constant energy of the trajectory.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The inverse-square central-force trajectory with , , and polar data , the interval , and the associated functions and .
Polar reduction: on all of , , (so and is strictly increasing), with , and the energy is constant (Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: , the effective-potential equation and energy conservation).
For a continuous injective strictly monotone function on an interval with nonvanishing derivative, the inverse is differentiable with (Derivative of an inverse: if is continuous and injective on a nondegenerate interval and differentiable at with , then the inverse is differentiable at with ; and if then is not differentiable at , Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point, The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set, Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length); the interior of an interval is an interval, and is an interval with nonempty interior.
The chain rule and the algebra of derivatives compute the derivatives of composites and quotients of functions (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).
Proof
By [L1], on . Since is and is continuous, the right-hand side is continuous, so is there. Thus is and positive. By [L2], has a inverse with ; the right-hand side is by [L3], so is . Therefore is a quotient of functions with nonvanishing denominator and is on .
Chain rule along the trajectory: for , , so [L3] gives ; multiplying by and using from [L1], which is clause 3.
Differentiating clause 3 with [L3] and using again gives Since , every equals for some , so this identity supplies the corresponding value of at every point of .
The reduction equation of [L1] for reads . Substituting steps 2.1 and 3.1, with , gives that is, on , which is clause 2.
Clause 4: the energy identity of [L1] gives . Substituting and clause 3, and ; hence along the trajectory. Since ranges over , the displayed identity between the constant and the continuous function on holds on .
The Kepler orbit equation is a conic: with
Statement
Let , , on , let be a central-force trajectory for with constant angular momentum , and constant energy (Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential), and let , and be as in Binet's equation for the attractive inverse-square field: for , with . Write and . Then:
- there are and with and for accordingly ;
- the energy and the eccentricity are related by consequently , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The inverse-square central-force trajectory with constant angular momentum , , constant energy , the solution of Binet's equation on the interval , and the constants , .
Binet's equation and the auxiliary identities: on , is an interval, and on (Binet's equation for the attractive inverse-square field: for ).
Solutions of on an interval with at least two points are for fixed in that interval (Solutions of are exactly the functions , Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).
Subtraction formula: ; is a bijection ; (The subtraction formulas for sine and cosine, is a bijection from onto the real unit circle, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine).
Chain rule and algebra of derivatives for the differentiated expressions below (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Proof
Note is equivalent to on by linearity of the second derivative. Since is an interval and Binet's equation holds on it (it contains at least two points because has at least two points), [L2] gives reals with for a fixed .
Put . If , then is a unit vector, so by [L3] there is with , ; if take . Then for every , [L3] gives Setting and , step 1.1 becomes on , which is the first assertion; the polar form follows by inverting on .
Energy: by [L1] and step 2.1, with , and (differentiate with [L4]); hence and . Substituting into [L1]: With one has and , so
Classification: since , the sign of equals the sign of ; with this is negative exactly for , zero exactly for and positive exactly for .
The one-dimensional action variable of a family of two-turning-point energy levels
Definition
Let be an open interval, let be continuous (Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point), let , let be reals, and let be functions with
The action variable of this datum is the function ,
the integral being the Riemann integral on the compact interval (The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded on as and , Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation ). It is defined because is continuous on : the radicand is a continuous nonnegative function there (it vanishes exactly at the two endpoints). Existence and uniqueness of nonnegative roots follow from Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are . For , if , then ; interchanging gives . Thus implies , proving continuity, including at zero. The continuous integrand is Riemann integrable by A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion.
Reading of the notation. The interval is the classically allowed segment between the two turning points of the energy , and the closed curve encloses the area (the upper graph minus the lower graph), so ; no physical interpretation of , or is a mathematical premise here, and no period is claimed by this definition.
The subcritical Kepler conic is an ellipse with semiaxes , , focus at the origin and area ; its area is also
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let and , and put
- is , -periodic, and .
- Let and . Then is Lebesgue measurable, and for the closed unit disc and one has ; consequently .
- For every , the ray meets in the unique point ; that point satisfies , and .
Thus the conic is the ellipse with centre , semiaxes , its right focus at the origin, and enclosed area .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The constants , , , , the profile , and the region .
Substitution and completion of the square: for all ; equivalently . [algebra]
Assuming countable choice, a diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for functions; the polar map is a diffeomorphism of onto its image (injective there, with nonsingular derivative, hence a diffeomorphism onto its open image by the injective-regular theorem); and a continuous function on a product with a nonnegative area element may be integrated iteratively by Tonelli (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions, An injective regular map is a diffeomorphism onto its image, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
A line in is Lebesgue null, and so is every subset of it (Every affine hyperplane of , and hence every proper linear subspace, is Lebesgue null); an invertible linear map scales Lebesgue measure by the absolute determinant, and the closed unit disc has measure (A linear map of sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with when is invertible and Lebesgue null when it is not, The closed form for the volume of the unit -ball).
is differentiable with , is -periodic, and ranges over ; (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine); sums, products and quotients of functions with nonvanishing denominator are (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point, Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).
Proof
Clause 1: is a quotient of functions with denominator , hence by [L4]; it is -periodic because is; and because .
Clause 2, the identity : by [L1], for , , so if and only if , that is, ; hence exactly when for some , since is a bijection of onto itself (its linear part is invertible, ).
Clause 3, the radial description: for put . Using [L4], , a quadratic in with positive leading coefficient (since ) and negative constant term ; hence the set of with is the interval : indeed is the unique positive root of , because substituting and multiplying by gives a direct expansion — and while as , so the two roots have opposite signs and the positive one is . Therefore , the boundary is the displayed profile, and each ray meets it exactly once.
Clause 2, the area: is an affine map with invertible linear part, hence a diffeomorphism of with everywhere; is closed (so Lebesgue measurable with indicator in ), and by step 1.2. The change-of-variables formula of [L2] applied to the indicator of gives ; the closed unit disc has by [L3], so .
Clause 3, the polar area formula: let and , where is the restriction of the polar map of [L2]. The set is Borel because is continuous, and is Borel because is a homeomorphism from onto its image. Since by step 1.3 and has finite measure by step 2.1, is integrable. The change-of-variables formula [L2] applied on gives the middle equality by Tonelli [L2] applied to the nonnegative function . By step 1.3, is contained in the closed positive -axis, including the origin, a subset of a line and hence null by [L3]. Therefore , which is clause 3.
Completeness and periodicity of the negative-energy Kepler orbit, with and
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , , on , and let be a central-force trajectory for with constant angular momentum , , and constant energy . Let , , , , , and be the conic data of The Kepler orbit equation is a conic: with , and let be polar data as in Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: , the effective-potential equation and energy conservation. Then:
- (Completeness.) extends uniquely to a central-force trajectory for defined on all of ; along it for every , and and are bounded. Consequently every maximal central-force trajectory with these data has domain .
- (Periodicity.) is a strictly increasing bijection with ; if and is determined by , then and for all .
- (Period value.) With and ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The inverse-square central-force trajectory with constant nonzero angular momentum and negative energy, its conic data from The Kepler orbit equation is a conic: with , and its polar data.
Polar reduction: with , , with , so is on ; the energy is constant (Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: , the effective-potential equation and energy conservation).
Conic data: for in the interior of , with and -periodic, , and (The Kepler orbit equation is a conic: with , The subcritical Kepler conic is an ellipse with semiaxes , , focus at the origin and area ; its area is also ).
Compact continuation: for with continuous and locally Lipschitz on an open , a solution whose values near a finite endpoint lie in a compact subset of extends past that endpoint; solutions agreeing at one time agree on every common interval containing it (Compact continuation for locally Lipschitz ODEs: a solution whose graph stays in a compact subset of the domain near a finite endpoint extends past it, Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems, First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals, Local Lipschitz continuity in the state variable, locally uniform in time and parameters).
Chain rule and derivative algebra: gives on the interior of , and is -periodic; sums, products, quotients and compositions of functions are (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function, Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).
The inverse of a continuous injective function with nonvanishing derivative on an interval is differentiable with (Derivative of an inverse: if is continuous and injective on a nondegenerate interval and differentiable at with , then the inverse is differentiable at with ; and if then is not differentiable at ); continuous functions on intervals have primitives and integrals are additive over adjacent subintervals (Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive , For : is integrable on if and only if it is integrable on and on , and then ; with the oriented form for arbitrary ).
Proof
By [L1] and [L2], for in the interior of the function satisfies and, by [L4], with ; since is continuous and -periodic, it is bounded on by , so on the interior of ; by continuity the bounds for and hold on all of .
Consider the state in the open set with right-hand side ; the radial equation of [L1] and give . Here , so is locally Lipschitz: on a state box with , each for satisfies by factoring the difference of reciprocal powers, while the first component is linear. Along every solution of this system, is constant, since ; its value is the given . With , direct algebra gives Thus every such solution has ; its energy identity bounds , and is bounded as well. On a bounded time interval, is consequently bounded, so near every finite endpoint lies in a compact subset of . Compact continuation [L3] extends it past every finite right endpoint. For a finite left endpoint apply [L3] to , which solves the time-reversed locally Lipschitz system . Hence the maximal extension of is defined on all of . For and , differentiating gives Since , and the second coefficient vanishes; the radial equation then gives . Thus the reconstructed satisfies the central-force equation. For any other continuation, the product rule and the central-force equation give , so its angular momentum vector agrees with the one on the overlap; cross-product orthogonality places it in the same plane. By [L1] it has polar data there, and shifting its angle lift by an integer multiple of makes the angle agree at a common time. The resulting state solves the same locally Lipschitz system with the same initial state, so uniqueness [L3] gives the same and hence the same trajectory. This is clause 1.
On , and , since and . Applying the conic supplier [L2] to the global extension gives the same profile : its sine and cosine coefficients agree with the original ones on the nonempty open angle interval , so their differences vanish identically (evaluate the difference and its derivative at one point). Thus on . Hence is strictly increasing with , so as and .
Let and let satisfy , i.e. (existence and uniqueness of come from step 2.1). Then by the -periodicity of , and using [L4], the -periodicity of , and step 2.1. Also by the periodicity of sine and cosine [L6], so and (differentiate and use the equalities just proved).
Change of variables in the defining relation of : is a continuous bijection with , so its inverse is differentiable with composed with [L5]. Hence, using and on the interval, the last equality by the -periodicity of .
Define . Since the state field in step 1.2 is independent of , solves the same equation as . By step 3.1 and the definition of , ; uniqueness [L3] gives on . Periodicity of sine and cosine then yields , and differentiation yields . This is clause 2.
By clause 3 of The subcritical Kepler conic is an ellipse with semiaxes , , focus at the origin and area ; its area is also , applied to the unshifted profile , with a translation of the integration variable by and invariance of a full-period integral under translation, , so step 4.1 gives .
Algebra: and by the definitions, so and ; with , and squaring gives . This is clause 3.
The action variable of a two-simple-turning-point family is with derivative , the period quadrature over
Statement
Let be an open interval, let be of class ( Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms), let , let , and let be functions with , , for , and
(the energy has exactly the two simple turning points , in ). Then:
- and are of class on ;
- the action variable of The one-dimensional action variable of a family of two-turning-point energy levels is of class on , and for every where the integral is the improper integral over the open interval , convergent at both endpoints.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data of the statement, with of class , exactly two simple turning points, and in between.
The Euclidean inverse function theorem: if is near and is invertible, then restricts to a bijection from a neighbourhood of onto a neighbourhood of with inverse (The Euclidean inverse function theorem). A map with invertible derivative has a local inverse by the same theorem applied to the derivative and induction on smoothness; in the one-variable case makes a diffeomorphism near onto its image.
Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: for continuous on with differentiable on with derivative , the function is differentiable with derivative ; with the chain rule this gives the variable-limit rule (Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with ).
Substitution: for differentiable on with integrable and continuous on an interval containing , (Substitution: if is differentiable on with integrable and is continuous on an interval containing , then ).
A continuous real function on a nonempty compact metric space attains a maximum (A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value); the integral is monotone and additive, and a continuous nonnegative function with a positive value has positive integral (If on and both are integrable then ; and , If on then for every partition ; in particular every constant function is integrable, with , A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion).
Continuous functions on intervals have primitives, sums, products and quotients with nonvanishing denominators of functions are , and the square root is on with derivative (Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with ).
Proof
Fix . Since and , the inverse function theorem [L1] applied to at and at gives and (hence ) functions with , and . Shrinking , continuity gives on the smaller interval. For every such , the two real numbers and are distinct solutions of ; by hypothesis the only two solutions in are , so ; since and , this forces and on that neighbourhood. Hence and are near the arbitrary point , which is clause 1.
Fix again. Since is continuous and , choose disjoint neighborhoods of and on which and , respectively. Choose in these neighborhoods with . By continuity of and from step 1.1, shrink so that for , and remain in the first neighborhood, and remain in the second, and . Thus is strictly decreasing on and strictly increasing on . On this energy interval write so that there.
The function is continuous on the compact rectangle and is continuous there, because for every and is continuous on the compact interval, so that on the rectangle after shrinking [L4, L5]. Hence by [L2] the middle term is with
For the left leg, use the open interval about chosen in step 2.1, containing every segment and having . On this interval is strictly monotone; its local inverses from [L1] agree on overlaps by injectivity, giving a inverse on the whole image interval. For near the substitution [L3] gives and is on the image interval; here for near since .
The right leg is treated identically: near one has , the local inverse of gives with of class , the substitution and the variable-limit Leibniz rule give
Substituting in the last integral [L3] turns the left leg into with of class and the integrand of class on a compact rectangle. By the variable-limit Leibniz rule [L2],
Integration by parts, equivalently the product rule applied to , gives substituting this into step 4.1 yields the last equality by the same substitutions read backwards [L3]: .
Adding the three derivatives of steps 3.1, 5.1 and 3.3 gives for , with the middle integral understood improperly at and . The endpoint pieces converge by steps 3.2–5.1 and 3.3; additivity on interior truncations and passage to the endpoint limits justify splitting this improper integral at . The second equality uses , and the last is the definition of .
The integrand is continuous and strictly positive on the nonempty open interval , so by [L4]; and the derivative computed in step 6.1 is independent of the auxiliary , so the formula holds on all of and is there. This is clause 2.
Scattering data: the incident flux measure, the solid-angle element, deflection branches and the cross-section density
Definition
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) for the Borel/Lebesgue measure foundation below.
Data. Let , let be of class ( Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms), let satisfy for every (a finite-range potential), and let and be reals. Write
Incident flux measure. Let be the Borel measure on the open rectangle given by the density against Lebesgue measure ,
the integral being that of Integral over a measurable subset; the nonnegative Borel function defines a measure by The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure (Borel measurable and Lebesgue measurable functions on ). In the model this measure records a uniform incident beam: an annulus of impact parameters contributes over the full azimuth range, or per unit azimuth.
Solid-angle element. Let be the Borel measure on with density against ,
where is the function of Sine and cosine defined by their real power series. It is continuous, being differentiable by The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine. Also by The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi; strict increase on and strict decrease on (Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine) give for . Thus is a nonnegative Borel function (continuous preimages of Borel sets are Borel, A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets), and The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure establishes that is a measure. This is the standard solid-angle element written (the surface measure of the unit sphere in spherical coordinates, restricted to the open chart).
Deflection branch. A deflection branch is an interval with at least two points together with a function that is of class and satisfies for every . Such a is strictly monotone (the continuous nonvanishing derivative has constant sign, and The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with gives strict monotonicity) and its image is an interval with endpoints (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length); its inverse is differentiable with , by the derivative-of-an-inverse theorem Derivative of an inverse: if is continuous and injective on a nondegenerate interval and differentiable at with , then the inverse is differentiable at with ; and if then is not differentiable at applied to the continuous injective (every point of is a limit point of it, Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of , The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set).
Cross-section density. The cross-section density of the branch is the function
Mathematical status. The measures, branches and density are abstract data independent of the finite-range trajectory data . A branch is not asserted to arise from any trajectory; the scattering theorems of this page identify the deflection angle computed from the central-force equation with the values of such a function under their hypotheses, and they compute the pushforward of under the induced map. No counting of detected particles, and no empirical claim, is part of this definition.
Finite-range scattering: the simple outer turning point, the two global branches and the free tails
Statement
Let , let be of class , let satisfy for every , let and , and put (Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential). Suppose satisfies
Let be a central-force trajectory for with constant nonzero angular momentum , , energy , and for all , whose radial part attains the value at some (Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: , the effective-potential equation and energy conservation). Then:
- on , where ; and , so is a strict minimum of ;
- extends uniquely to a central-force trajectory on all of ; along the extension , for , and is strictly decreasing on and strictly increasing on ;
- the time quadrature is finite for every and satisfies for all ;
- for every time with the motion is exactly free from on: for all , and is strictly increasing there; symmetrically, for with , for all .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite-range central-force data , the energy , the angular momentum with , the simple outer turning point of , and a trajectory with attaining at .
Polar reduction and energy: , , , , and the constant energy is (Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: , the effective-potential equation and energy conservation; here by Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential).
Compact continuation and uniqueness for locally Lipschitz autonomous systems: solutions trapped in a compact subset of the open state domain have no finite endpoints, and two solutions with the same state at one time agree on every common interval (Compact continuation for locally Lipschitz ODEs: a solution whose graph stays in a compact subset of the domain near a finite endpoint extends past it, Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems, First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals, Local Lipschitz continuity in the state variable, locally uniform in time and parameters).
Substitution and monotone inversion: a strictly monotone function on an interval with nonvanishing derivative has a inverse with reciprocal derivative, and substitution converts into on such a branch (Derivative of an inverse: if is continuous and injective on a nondegenerate interval and differentiable at with , then the inverse is differentiable at with ; and if then is not differentiable at , Substitution: if is differentiable on with integrable and is continuous on an interval containing , then , The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length, Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).
Behaviour of the quadrature: is continuous and strictly positive on , comparable to near (so is integrable at ), and tends to as (so , whenever , since there ); continuous functions on intervals have primitives and the integral is additive over adjacent intervals (Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive , Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point, Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Proof
Square the energy identity of [L1]: , which is clause 1's first display. At a time with the right side is , so ; then , so is a strict local minimum of , and in particular for near but different from .
On the open set where , the right side of the energy identity is strictly positive, so ; hence the sign of is constant on every connected component of (a union of open intervals on which the continuous nonvanishing function has a sign).
Global extension: take the state in with right-hand side . This field is locally Lipschitz: near any , continuity of bounds it by some on a small closed interval; the fundamental theorem for continuous gives , and the Darboux definition with gives . Also is locally Lipschitz by factoring the difference of reciprocal powers. Along every solution, is constant by the radial equation. Also on every continuation: if it entered , continuity from would give a boundary time with and values below arbitrarily nearby on one side; there gives and the equation gives , contradicting the strict local-minimum property. Thus and . The function is bounded below on because is continuous and vanishes beyond , so is bounded; also . On every bounded time interval, and are therefore bounded, so near every finite right endpoint lies in a compact subset of the state domain and [L2] continues it. For a finite left endpoint apply [L2] to , which solves . Hence the maximal extension of is defined on . Set and . The relation gives ; differentiating gives whose second coefficient vanishes. Using then yields , so the reconstructed curve satisfies the central-force equation. Any other continuation has the same angular momentum on the overlap: along it by the central-force equation, so it remains in the same plane. By [L1] it has polar data there; shift its angle lift by an integer multiple of to match at a common time. The resulting state solves the same locally Lipschitz system with the same initial state, so uniqueness [L2] gives the same and hence the same trajectory.
Shape of the set . This set is open in , and on each of its connected components has a constant sign (step 2.1). Every bounded component satisfies (endpoints of a component of the open set lie in its complement, where , i.e. ); at both endpoints by step 1.1, so changes sign from negative to positive at each of them, whence just inside the component the sign is positive near and negative near , contradicting constancy of the sign. Hence has no bounded component. Since is an isolated zero of (a strict local minimum by step 1.1) and points just left and just right of belong to , the two components adjacent to are and : an open subset of has at most two unbounded components, and each of these two is unbounded on its outer side (a bounded component is impossible, and it cannot end on the inner side at a point other than , since its inner endpoint would be an endpoint of a component at which is attained, producing a second strict minimum and the same sign contradiction as above). Therefore exactly for , on and on .
The quadrature: set for . The integral defining is finite and continuous at by [L4], and for . On the outgoing branch, the chain rule and give for ; taking the limit as yields . On the incoming branch, gives , hence . The function is strictly increasing on and tends to by [L4], so it maps this interval onto . Inverting the outgoing identity gives for every ; the incoming identity gives the corresponding incoming branch. In particular the unique time with is , and for . These are clauses 2 and 3.
Free tails: suppose with . By step 3.1, is strictly increasing on , so for all . On that regime the potential is identically zero and the Cartesian central-force equation reduces to , since for ; hence is affine on and there. The incoming statement is the same argument on . This is clause 4.
Existence of the asymptotic velocities and the impact-parameter identity
Statement
Let the hypotheses of Finite-range scattering: the simple outer turning point, the two global branches and the free tails hold, with finite-range potential , energy , angular momentum , , outer turning point , and let be the extension of the trajectory. Then:
- the limits exist and satisfy ;
- for every with , the incoming free tail is the half-line , whose affine extension is the straight line ; its perpendicular distance from the origin is
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite-range scattering orbit with its simple outer turning point and its two global branches, and times , with .
Free tails: for with , for all ; and symmetrically for with , for all (Finite-range scattering: the simple outer turning point, the two global branches and the free tails).
On the free regime the potential vanishes identically, so the constant energy is there (Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential, Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential).
For nonzero , the perpendicular distance from the origin to the line equals : the closest point is , whose squared norm is by the Gram identity (The squared cross-product norm is the Gram determinant of two vectors, The Euclidean inner product on , The cross product in ).
Proof
By [L1] the velocity is constant on the outgoing tail: for all , so exists; symmetrically is the constant velocity on the incoming tail .
By [L2] applied at and , ; hence . This is clause 1.
The incoming line: by [L1] all points with lie on the set , a line through with direction (it has norm ).
Its perpendicular distance from the origin is, by [L4] applied to , , using that and from [L3]. Defining to be this distance gives , which is clause 2.
The scattering angle advance and the deflection relation: the total polar advance is and the velocity directions make the cosine
Statement
Let the hypotheses of Finite-range scattering: the simple outer turning point, the two global branches and the free tails hold, let be the extension of the trajectory, and let be polar data with , (Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: , the effective-potential equation and energy conservation). Write for the apsis time, and for let be the rotation of the plane , . Then:
- the half-angle is finite and positive, and
- exist and equal (as ) and (as );
- consequently in particular, if then is the (undirected) angle between the asymptotic velocity directions, and the signed velocity rotation is in the orientation defined by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite-range scattering orbit with its apsis time , its polar data, its asymptotic velocities (Existence of the asymptotic velocities and the impact-parameter identity ) and the frozen angular momentum , .
Branch structure and quadrature: , is strictly decreasing on and strictly increasing on , has the corresponding signs, and (Finite-range scattering: the simple outer turning point, the two global branches and the free tails).
and is strictly increasing (Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: , the effective-potential equation and energy conservation).
Substitution on a strictly monotone branch and the conversion (Substitution: if is differentiable on with integrable and is continuous on an interval containing , then , Derivative of an inverse: if is continuous and injective on a nondegenerate interval and differentiable at with , then the inverse is differentiable at with ; and if then is not differentiable at , The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).
The addition formulas give for all , and the cross product identity for every : the mixed term of vanishes because under the determinant form of the scalar triple product (The addition formulas for sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, The cross product is bilinear, alternating, and orthogonal to both factors, The cross product in ).
Free tails: for with , for ; symmetrically on the incoming tail with (Finite-range scattering: the simple outer turning point, the two global branches and the free tails, Existence of the asymptotic velocities and the impact-parameter identity ).
Proof
Outgoing half-angle: on , is and strictly increasing with , and is a strictly increasing bijection of onto ; substituting for first on compact subintervals of , where , and then taking endpoint limits [L3] gives using from [L1]; the integral converges at because is comparable to there and diverges nowhere else, and it is positive.
Incoming half-angle: the same computation on the decreasing branch , where and the substitution reverses the sign, gives ; adding the two halves gives , which is clause 1.
Direction limits: on the outgoing tail [L5], as (an affine curve with nonzero velocity direction tends to its velocity direction), and because has a finite limit and is continuous; hence . On the incoming tail, tends to , so , while ; hence . This is clause 2.
Rotation form: by [L4], , the first equality of clause 3.
Cosine: writing , the last identity gives , because by [L4]. Since , this gives the displayed cosine; if then and the identity says that the angle between the two nonzero velocity vectors (the unique angle in whose cosine is the displayed value, cosine being strictly decreasing there) is .
One-dimensional substitution on a deflection branch: the outgoing angular measure has density , hence cross-section density
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be a deflection branch of Scattering data: the incident flux measure, the solid-angle element, deflection branches and the cross-section density, with inverse , and set , and . Restrict the incident measure to . Its pushforward, defined by for Borel , satisfies For every nonnegative Borel , and for every real Borel with either side's integral of finite, consequently The nonnegative equality allows ; in the real case both sides are finite and absolute integrability on one side is equivalent to that on the other. In particular it applies to continuous periodic test functions that are nonnegative or absolutely integrable, and to compactly supported continuous test functions. No equality of undefined signed improper integrals is asserted. Nonnegative double-integral notation denotes the corresponding Lebesgue integrals, with iterated integrals justified by Tonelli.
Thus the outgoing angular measure has density against and density against the solid-angle measure. For finitely many branches on disjoint incident intervals the measures add, including on overlapping image intervals; in particular contributions with pairwise disjoint images add.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice, the branch, its inverse, and the test function as stated.
The inverse is , with ; the sign of the continuous nonzero derivative is constant, so the branch is strictly monotone (Derivative of an inverse: if is continuous and injective on a nondegenerate interval and differentiable at with , then the inverse is differentiable at with ; and if then is not differentiable at , The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with , Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length, Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point).
Compact substitution with absolute derivative holds on every closed interval lying strictly inside the branch; continuous functions there are Riemann integrable and their Riemann and Lebesgue integrals agree under countable choice (In one dimension the compact-Jordan formula is substitution over the unoriented image interval with the absolute derivative, A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion, A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral).
On Borel subsets of the plane , and Tonelli applies to nonnegative Borel integrands. Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system with an increasing common finite-measure exhaustion agree everywhere (On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system).
Continuous maps have Borel preimages; a nonnegative measurable density defines a measure. Nonnegative measurable functions have increasing simple approximations and monotone convergence holds; real integrability means finite integral of the absolute value (A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets, The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure, Every nonnegative measurable function is the increasing limit of simple measurable functions, Monotone convergence for the integral, Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals, Scattering data: the incident flux measure, the solid-angle element, deflection branches and the cross-section density).
on : the solid-angle definition proves this from and strict increase/decrease on the two half intervals; its continuous density is Borel measurable (Scattering data: the incident flux measure, the solid-angle element, deflection branches and the cross-section density).
Proof
By [L1], is and is continuous and positive. The map is a homeomorphism , so is a Borel measure: preimages are Borel and preserve disjoint countable unions. The nonnegative density defines another Borel measure by [L4].
Let lie in and . Apply compact substitution [L2] to the inverse map on , with integrand : writing , , it gives . Endpoints have Lebesgue measure zero, so Tonelli [L3] yields . These quantities are finite.
Interior open rectangles, together with the empty set, form a pi-system generating the Borel sets of : rational rectangles form a countable base, and every open set is the union of those base rectangles it contains. Choose explicit nested interior intervals exhausting each open coordinate interval; their product rectangles exhaust and have the common finite measure of step 2.1. Thus measure uniqueness [L3] gives on every Borel set of , proving the asserted pushforward identity even for unbounded open branches.
The test-function identity first holds for indicator functions by step 3.1 and the definition of pushforward, then for nonnegative simple functions by finite addition, and finally for every nonnegative Borel by increasing simple approximation and monotone convergence [L4] on both sides. Apply this to to obtain equivalence of absolute integrability; applying it to the positive and negative parts gives the real identity whenever that absolute integral is finite. Tonelli [L3] supplies the nonnegative iterated form.
Since by [L5], rewriting gives the solid-angle density; [L1] gives its reciprocal-derivative expression. Pushforward commutes with finite addition of measures by its definition, so branches on disjoint incident intervals contribute the sum of these measures, and the sum of the densities wherever their images overlap. This proves all assertions.
Repulsive Coulomb scattering: the unique outer turning point, global non-colliding motion, the asymptotic impact distance and
Statement
Let , let and on (the repulsive Coulomb potential, of class ), let and , and put Then:
-
is strictly decreasing on , with as and as ; hence there is exactly one with , it is simple (), and for all .
-
Let be a central-force trajectory for with constant angular momentum , , energy , with for all and with for some . Then extends uniquely to all of ; along the extension (no collision), is strictly decreasing on and strictly increasing on , and the asymptotic velocities exist with . Moreover the asymptotic perpendicular distance of each branch to its limiting direction exists and equals The distance in clause 2 means the limit of as , the distance to the line through the origin in the limiting velocity direction; it does not assert a free tail or a finite longitudinal intercept.
-
For the polar angle, with ,
-
Write . Then , , and in an oriented polar plane the outgoing velocity direction is the incoming direction rotated by . In particular For fixed this gives an actual family for every , with angular momentum : choose its unique turning radius and initial data , . Local existence and the extension in clause 2 give a member of the family for every , unique up to apsis time and oriented plane placement.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The repulsive Coulomb data , the effective potential , the outer turning point , and a scattering trajectory with apsis time .
A continuous real function on an interval with everywhere negative derivative is strictly decreasing; a strictly monotone continuous function assumes each intermediate value exactly once, and its inverse is differentiable at with derivative whenever is differentiable at with (On an interval , for continuous on and differentiable at every interior point: throughout gives nondecreasing, gives increasing, and give the two decreasing forms; conversely a nondecreasing has and a nonincreasing has wherever it is differentiable, and no strict converse is claimed, Intermediate value theorem, by bisection with a canonical left-half rule: a continuous function on takes every value between and , Derivative of an inverse: if is continuous and injective on a nondegenerate interval and differentiable at with , then the inverse is differentiable at with ; and if then is not differentiable at , Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).
The Cartesian field is defined on the open set and is there. Its acceleration derivative is . Thus is bounded on a sufficiently small convex ball about each point of ; along a segment in such a ball, the chain rule and the vector-valued fundamental theorem of calculus give , and the norm inequality for vector integrals gives a finite Lipschitz bound. Hence is locally Lipschitz, so Picard–Lindelöf uniqueness and compact continuation apply on (Compact continuation for locally Lipschitz ODEs: a solution whose graph stays in a compact subset of the domain near a finite endpoint extends past it, Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems, First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals, Local Lipschitz continuity in the state variable, locally uniform in time and parameters, If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz, For and integrable when , ; for , is integrable, Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).
Substitution on strictly monotone branches converts time into radial level and vice versa (Substitution: if is differentiable on with integrable and is continuous on an interval containing , then , The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive ).
Trigonometry (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine gives from the derivative at zero): is the inverse of ; , are the principal inverses; the addition and subtraction formulas hold; ; is strictly decreasing on and is strictly increasing on (The principal inverse tangent , Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine, The addition formulas for sine and cosine, The subtraction formulas for sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine, Tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant on their exact natural domains).
The norm bound for the vector integral and componentwise Euclidean completeness justify the velocity Cauchy criterion; the Gram identity gives when is the angle to the limiting direction (For and integrable when , ; for , is integrable, If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz, and for with the Euclidean metric are complete, componentwise from the Cauchy criterion in , The squared cross-product norm is the Gram determinant of two vectors).
Proof
The derivative is negative on , so is strictly decreasing by [L2]; and as , while both terms tend to as . Hence is a continuous strictly decreasing bijection ; since lies in the range, is the unique solution of , it is simple because everywhere, and for . This is clause 1.
Global continuation: energy and angular momentum are conserved by [L1], and forces since is strictly decreasing. Also because . At any finite endpoint, is bounded above by its value at a fixed time plus times the elapsed time, and stays at least from the origin. Thus the Cartesian state stays in a compact subset of near that endpoint. The Cartesian field is smooth there; compact continuation [L3] extends the solution past every finite right endpoint. For a finite left endpoint apply the same argument to the time-reversed state , which solves the same autonomous Cartesian system; uniqueness [L3] then makes the global extension unique. The maximal extension therefore has domain .
Branch shape: for all times by step 1.1. Hence is strictly increasing, vanishes at by the energy identity, is negative before and positive after it. Consequently the apsis is unique and elsewhere. Fixing any gives for , so forward; the same argument backward gives there. On either open branch, compact substitution [L4] and then limits give . Its lower endpoint is integrable since is comparable to by ; its upper endpoint diverges since the integrand tends to . This proves the branch and quadrature claims without a finite-range hypothesis.
Asymptotic velocities and their speed: since along each branch (as ), . Put and . The radial-speed limit implies for sufficiently large ; integrating on each monotone branch gives for a finite constant . In particular after increasing the tail cutoff. The acceleration of the Cartesian curve is , so for large , an integrable bound along each half-line; the Cauchy criterion for the vector integral (the integral of over is bounded by ) therefore gives existence of . Passing to the limit in the energy identity with gives .
Half-angle quadrature: on compact subintervals of either open branch use and in [L4]. Taking limits gives the same positive half-angle on both sides of the apsis, Each substitution is first on an interior compact interval. The integral converges at by the square-root bound of step 3.1 and at infinity by the bound , so it gives finite limits with .
Evaluation with scaled roots: put , and , where . Then . Substitute on interior compact intervals, where and . The derivative is and the positive denominator is , so the integral equals after taking limits. Since and , , giving by [L5]. Hence . This proves clause 3.
Direction limits: differentiating gives , where . By step 4.1, forward and backward, while the tangential term tends to zero. Step 4.2 therefore gives and . The addition formulas [L5] and show the velocity rotation and the displayed cosine. There is no hidden extra winding: the radial coefficient changes sign only once, the tangential coefficient is always positive, so the velocity direction relative to varies continuously from to through the upper half-plane; its net change is .
Impact limit: put for . On the outgoing branch the remaining angle is , so As , for any one has for every for some . Once , the difference between the integral above and is at most . Thus and ; the elementary limit gives . By step 6.1 this is exactly . The incoming computation uses and the remaining angle and gives as well.
For every set and take the turning radius of clause 1. The initial data stated in clause 4 have angular momentum and energy , radial derivative zero and positive radial second derivative. Local existence [L3] supplies a trajectory and conservation [L1] forces ; the preceding continuation, angle and impact-limit steps apply to it. Uniqueness [L3] determines it from its apsis state. Thus this actual family realises the deflection formula for all , and all clauses are proved.
The Rutherford deflection map, its inverse, the cross-section density and the divergence of the total cross-section
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) for the cross-section measures. Fix , and . For every put and use the Coulomb trajectory family of Repulsive Coulomb scattering: the unique outer turning point, global non-colliding motion, the asymptotic impact distance and clause 4. Its impact distance is and its deflection map Then:
- is and strictly decreasing, with as and as ; it is a bijection with inverse
- For every interval the pair is a deflection branch with cross-section density finite and positive on ; and the pushforward of the incident flux measure under the branch is described by One-dimensional substitution on a deflection branch: the outgoing angular measure has density , hence cross-section density .
- For every the truncated total cross-section while for the integral over is finite; in this sense the total cross-section of the ideal Coulomb model diverges at forward angles and every compact angular acceptance away from has finite cross-section.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice, the fixed data , the family , the deflection map and its asserted inverse .
is the inverse of , is and strictly increasing, and for every real ; on one has (The principal inverse tangent , Tangent is a continuous strictly increasing bijection from onto , Principal arctangent: derivative, integral, power series, and the Gregory–Leibniz series).
Trigonometric calculus: derivatives of and their Pythagorean and parity identities, the cotangent double-angle form , and for (Derivatives and fundamental periods of tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant, Pythagorean and parity identities for all six trigonometric functions on their natural domains, The addition formulas for sine and cosine, The subtraction formulas for sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine, Tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant on their exact natural domains).
The half-angle advance for the Coulomb branch is and the deflection magnitude is (Repulsive Coulomb scattering: the unique outer turning point, global non-colliding motion, the asymptotic impact distance and clauses 3-4).
Chain, quotient and inverse-function rules: and are with the derivatives computed below; the inverse of a continuous injective function with nonvanishing derivative has reciprocal derivative (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , Derivative of an inverse: if is continuous and injective on a nondegenerate interval and differentiable at with , then the inverse is differentiable at with ; and if then is not differentiable at , Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set, Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).
One-dimensional substitution/change of variables with the absolute derivative and the branch density identity hold on every deflection branch (One-dimensional substitution on a deflection branch: the outgoing angular measure has density , hence cross-section density , Scattering data: the incident flux measure, the solid-angle element, deflection branches and the cross-section density).
A continuous nonnegative function with a positive value has positive integral, the integral is monotone, and for the computed integral diverges as ; for (mean value theorem applied to on , using ) and for (The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then , If on and both are integrable then ; and , A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion, Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive , The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with , Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine, For : is integrable on if and only if it is integrable on and on , and then ; with the oriented form for arbitrary , Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function, Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point).
Proof
Differentiation of the branch: by [L4] and [L2], so is with strictly negative derivative, hence strictly decreasing; as , and tends to , so ; as , and . The image is therefore and the inverse exists, is by [L4], and satisfies the claimed formula: for , by [L1] (since ) and with , because by [L2]; substituting shows .
The half-angle and deflection relation of [L3] applied for each to the corresponding trajectory with give exactly the deflection value ; thus the abstract branch formula is the computed scattering deflection of the Coulomb problem, and clause 1 is complete.
Cross-section density: by [L2], , so ; combining with [L5], Using from [L2], whence , finite and positive on ; this is clause 2.
Divergence: for with , the integrand of clause 3 equals by the same identities; since for and by [L6], the integrand is at least with . Hence for , by monotonicity of the integral and the -integration of a constant, as , by the fundamental theorem and [L6]; hence the truncated integral over diverges. If instead , cut the interval at and use the divergence on together with additivity.
Finiteness on compact angular intervals: the integrand is continuous on the compact rectangle because there, so its integral is finite by [L6]; this completes clause 3.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
None yet.
Sources
- David Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge), §2.5.4, printed pp. 31-33, Eqs. (2.82)-(2.89): two-body reduction, the conserved $J=\mu r^2\dot\phi$, the radial equation and the effective potential $V_{\rm eff}(r)=V(r)+J^2/(2\mu r^2)$
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §3.4, Eqs. (3.44)-(3.65): motion in a central field, the first integral and the effective potential
- David Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge), §2.5.4, printed p. 31, Eqs. (2.83)-(2.84): polar coordinates in the orbital plane and the conserved $J=\mu r^2\dot\phi$
- Richard Fitzpatrick, Newtonian Dynamics (University of Texas at Austin), §6.3 Motion in a General Central Force-Field: use of polar coordinates $(r,\theta)$ in the orbital plane with the angular first integral
- David Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge), §2.6, printed pp. 38-44: small oscillations and the oscillatory solution with frequency squared $\omega^2$
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, Ch. 2 small oscillations: the second-order linear oscillator and its general sinusoidal solution
- David Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge), §1.1, printed pp. 1-2: the vector triple product and the orthonormality identities for the cross product
- Richard Fitzpatrick, Newtonian Dynamics (University of Texas at Austin), §2.5 and Appendix A: vector identities for the cross product, including the triple product rule
- David Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge), §1.1 and §2.5.4: orthonormal vector triads, the right-handed relation $\mathbf e_1\times\mathbf e_2=\mathbf e_3$ and planar coordinates in the orbital plane
- Richard Fitzpatrick, Newtonian Dynamics (University of Texas at Austin), §2.4: Cartesian components, orthonormal bases and the scalar-product expansion $\mathbf a=(\mathbf a\cdot\mathbf e_1)\mathbf e_1+(\mathbf a\cdot\mathbf e_2)\mathbf e_2$
- David Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge), §2.5.4, printed p. 31, Eqs. (2.83)-(2.84): the orbit lies in a plane perpendicular to the conserved angular momentum
- Richard Fitzpatrick, Newtonian Dynamics (University of Texas at Austin), §6.3 Motion in a General Central Force-Field, Eqs. (299)-(304): the angular first integral $r^2\dot\theta=h$ in polar coordinates
- David Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge), §2.5.4, printed pp. 31-33, Eqs. (2.83)-(2.88): the planar polar Lagrangian, the conserved $J=\mu r^2\dot\phi$, the radial equation $\mu\ddot r=-\partial_rV_{\rm eff}$ and the energy $E=\frac12\mu\dot r^2+V_{\rm eff}(r)$
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §3.4, Eqs. (3.44)-(3.57): polar coordinates in a central field, the first integral and the effective radial equation
- David Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge), §2.5.4 and Figure 15, printed pp. 31-33: circular, elliptic and hyperbolic orbits as features of the effective potential $V_{\rm eff}$
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §3.4, Eqs. (3.52)-(3.58): the circular-orbit condition $\mathrm dU_{\rm eff}/\mathrm dr=0$ and small radial oscillations about it
- David Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge), §2.5.4, printed pp. 32-33: the inverse-square radial equation and the orbit equation for $r(\phi)$
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §3.4, Eqs. (3.59)-(3.65): the Binet-type equation and the conic solution with eccentricity $e$ for the Coulomb/Kepler potential
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §3.4, Eqs. (3.59)-(3.65): the conic $r=p/(1+e\cos\varphi)$ and the eccentricity-energy relation
- David Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge), §2.5.4, printed pp. 32-33: elliptic and hyperbolic orbit classes in terms of the sign of the energy for the inverse-square potential
- David Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge), §4.5.3, printed pp. 108-111, Eqs. (4.133)-(4.142): the action variable $I=\frac{1}{2\pi}\oint p\,dq$ of a one-dimensional system and the identity $\omega=dE/dI$
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §10.4: adiabatic invariants and the action variable of a periodic one-dimensional motion
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §3.4, Eqs. (3.59)-(3.65) and Fig. 8: the elliptic branch $E<0$, $e<1$, with the turning radii and the ellipse geometry
- Richard Fitzpatrick, Newtonian Dynamics (University of Texas at Austin), §5.5 and §5.6: the elliptic orbit of the Kepler problem, its semiaxes and the focus at the force centre
- David Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge), §2.5.4, printed pp. 32-33, Eqs. (2.86)-(2.90): the $E<0$ elliptic branch of the inverse-square problem
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §3.4, Eqs. (3.59)-(3.65): the elliptic branch and the relation between period, semimajor axis and potential strength
- David Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge), §4.5.3, printed pp. 108-111, Eqs. (4.136)-(4.142): $I=\frac1{2\pi}\oint p\,\mathrm dq$, the varying-endpoint cancellation and the identity $\mathrm dE/\mathrm dI=\omega=2\pi/T$
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, Ch. 10: the action variable and its energy derivative for a periodic one-dimensional motion
- Richard Fitzpatrick, Newtonian Dynamics (University of Texas at Austin), §6.4 Scattering in the Center of Mass Frame, Eqs. (340)-(367): impact parameter, turning-point quadrature, the annular incident area and outgoing solid angle
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §3.5, Eqs. (3.66)-(3.72): impact parameter, scattering angle, uniform-beam counting and the geometric cross-section relation
- Richard Fitzpatrick, Newtonian Dynamics (University of Texas at Austin), §6.4, Eqs. (340)-(346): the energy equation, the turning point and the two asymptotic branches of a scattering orbit
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §3.5, Eqs. (3.66)-(3.68): the nearest-approach point, the equality of the two branch angle changes and the scattering-angle quadrature
- Richard Fitzpatrick, Newtonian Dynamics (University of Texas at Austin), §6.4, Eqs. (340)-(346): the asymptotic velocity, the impact parameter and the relation $L=mvb$
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §3.5, Eq. (3.66): $L_z=b(2mE)^{1/2}$ for a scattering orbit
- Richard Fitzpatrick, Newtonian Dynamics (University of Texas at Austin), §6.4, Eqs. (346)-(351): the scattering-angle quadrature and the relation between the half-angle and the deflection
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §3.5, Eqs. (3.66)-(3.68): $\theta=\pi-2\varphi_0$ with the nearest-approach angle $\varphi_0$
- Richard Fitzpatrick, Newtonian Dynamics (University of Texas at Austin), §6.4, Eqs. (347)-(351): the annular incident area $2\pi b\,\mathrm db$ and the outgoing solid angle, giving $\mathrm d\sigma/\mathrm d\Omega=(b/\sin\theta)|\mathrm db/\mathrm d\theta|$
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §3.5, Eqs. (3.70)-(3.72): the differential cross-section and the geometric relation $\mathrm d\sigma/\mathrm d\Omega=b|\mathrm db/\mathrm d\theta|/\sin\theta$
- Richard Fitzpatrick, Newtonian Dynamics (University of Texas at Austin), §6.4, Eqs. (358)-(366): the inverse-square scattering integral, the Rutherford angle relation and the asymptotic distance
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §3.5, Eqs. (3.68)-(3.69): the scattering integral for the Coulomb potential, $\tan(\theta/2)=\alpha/(2Eb)$
- Richard Fitzpatrick, Newtonian Dynamics (University of Texas at Austin), §6.4, Eqs. (358)-(367): the Rutherford cross-section and the small-angle divergence of the total cross-section
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §3.5, Eq. (3.69) and following: $\tan(\theta/2)=\alpha/(2Eb)$ and the Rutherford scattering formula