How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Repulsive Coulomb scattering: the unique outer turning point, global non-colliding motion, the asymptotic impact distance and
Statement
Let , let and on (the repulsive Coulomb potential, of class ), let and , and put Then:
-
is strictly decreasing on , with as and as ; hence there is exactly one with , it is simple (), and for all .
-
Let be a central-force trajectory for with constant angular momentum , , energy , with for all and with for some . Then extends uniquely to all of ; along the extension (no collision), is strictly decreasing on and strictly increasing on , and the asymptotic velocities exist with . Moreover the asymptotic perpendicular distance of each branch to its limiting direction exists and equals The distance in clause 2 means the limit of as , the distance to the line through the origin in the limiting velocity direction; it does not assert a free tail or a finite longitudinal intercept.
-
For the polar angle, with ,
-
Write . Then , , and in an oriented polar plane the outgoing velocity direction is the incoming direction rotated by . In particular For fixed this gives an actual family for every , with angular momentum : choose its unique turning radius and initial data , . Local existence and the extension in clause 2 give a member of the family for every , unique up to apsis time and oriented plane placement.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The repulsive Coulomb data , the effective potential , the outer turning point , and a scattering trajectory with apsis time .
A continuous real function on an interval with everywhere negative derivative is strictly decreasing; a strictly monotone continuous function assumes each intermediate value exactly once, and its inverse is differentiable at with derivative whenever is differentiable at with (On an interval , for continuous on and differentiable at every interior point: throughout gives nondecreasing, gives increasing, and give the two decreasing forms; conversely a nondecreasing has and a nonincreasing has wherever it is differentiable, and no strict converse is claimed, Intermediate value theorem, by bisection with a canonical left-half rule: a continuous function on takes every value between and , Derivative of an inverse: if is continuous and injective on a nondegenerate interval and differentiable at with , then the inverse is differentiable at with ; and if then is not differentiable at , Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).
The Cartesian field is defined on the open set and is there. Its acceleration derivative is . Thus is bounded on a sufficiently small convex ball about each point of ; along a segment in such a ball, the chain rule and the vector-valued fundamental theorem of calculus give , and the norm inequality for vector integrals gives a finite Lipschitz bound. Hence is locally Lipschitz, so Picard–Lindelöf uniqueness and compact continuation apply on (Compact continuation for locally Lipschitz ODEs: a solution whose graph stays in a compact subset of the domain near a finite endpoint extends past it, Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems, First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals, Local Lipschitz continuity in the state variable, locally uniform in time and parameters, If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz, For and integrable when , ; for , is integrable, Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).
Substitution on strictly monotone branches converts time into radial level and vice versa (Substitution: if is differentiable on with integrable and is continuous on an interval containing , then , The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive ).
Trigonometry (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine gives from the derivative at zero): is the inverse of ; , are the principal inverses; the addition and subtraction formulas hold; ; is strictly decreasing on and is strictly increasing on (The principal inverse tangent , Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine, The addition formulas for sine and cosine, The subtraction formulas for sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine, Tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant on their exact natural domains).
The norm bound for the vector integral and componentwise Euclidean completeness justify the velocity Cauchy criterion; the Gram identity gives when is the angle to the limiting direction (For and integrable when , ; for , is integrable, If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz, and for with the Euclidean metric are complete, componentwise from the Cauchy criterion in , The squared cross-product norm is the Gram determinant of two vectors).
Proof
The derivative is negative on , so is strictly decreasing by [L2]; and as , while both terms tend to as . Hence is a continuous strictly decreasing bijection ; since lies in the range, is the unique solution of , it is simple because everywhere, and for . This is clause 1.
Global continuation: energy and angular momentum are conserved by [L1], and forces since is strictly decreasing. Also because . At any finite endpoint, is bounded above by its value at a fixed time plus times the elapsed time, and stays at least from the origin. Thus the Cartesian state stays in a compact subset of near that endpoint. The Cartesian field is smooth there; compact continuation [L3] extends the solution past every finite right endpoint. For a finite left endpoint apply the same argument to the time-reversed state , which solves the same autonomous Cartesian system; uniqueness [L3] then makes the global extension unique. The maximal extension therefore has domain .
Branch shape: for all times by step 1.1. Hence is strictly increasing, vanishes at by the energy identity, is negative before and positive after it. Consequently the apsis is unique and elsewhere. Fixing any gives for , so forward; the same argument backward gives there. On either open branch, compact substitution [L4] and then limits give . Its lower endpoint is integrable since is comparable to by ; its upper endpoint diverges since the integrand tends to . This proves the branch and quadrature claims without a finite-range hypothesis.
Asymptotic velocities and their speed: since along each branch (as ), . Put and . The radial-speed limit implies for sufficiently large ; integrating on each monotone branch gives for a finite constant . In particular after increasing the tail cutoff. The acceleration of the Cartesian curve is , so for large , an integrable bound along each half-line; the Cauchy criterion for the vector integral (the integral of over is bounded by ) therefore gives existence of . Passing to the limit in the energy identity with gives .
Half-angle quadrature: on compact subintervals of either open branch use and in [L4]. Taking limits gives the same positive half-angle on both sides of the apsis, Each substitution is first on an interior compact interval. The integral converges at by the square-root bound of step 3.1 and at infinity by the bound , so it gives finite limits with .
Evaluation with scaled roots: put , and , where . Then . Substitute on interior compact intervals, where and . The derivative is and the positive denominator is , so the integral equals after taking limits. Since and , , giving by [L5]. Hence . This proves clause 3.
Direction limits: differentiating gives , where . By step 4.1, forward and backward, while the tangential term tends to zero. Step 4.2 therefore gives and . The addition formulas [L5] and show the velocity rotation and the displayed cosine. There is no hidden extra winding: the radial coefficient changes sign only once, the tangential coefficient is always positive, so the velocity direction relative to varies continuously from to through the upper half-plane; its net change is .
Impact limit: put for . On the outgoing branch the remaining angle is , so As , for any one has for every for some . Once , the difference between the integral above and is at most . Thus and ; the elementary limit gives . By step 6.1 this is exactly . The incoming computation uses and the remaining angle and gives as well.
For every set and take the turning radius of clause 1. The initial data stated in clause 4 have angular momentum and energy , radial derivative zero and positive radial second derivative. Local existence [L3] supplies a trajectory and conservation [L1] forces ; the preceding continuation, angle and impact-limit steps apply to it. Uniqueness [L3] determines it from its apsis state. Thus this actual family realises the deflection formula for all , and all clauses are proved.
Depends on
Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential
Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: , the effective-potential equation and energy conservation
Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems
First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals
Local Lipschitz continuity in the state variable, locally uniform in time and parameters
Substitution: if is differentiable on with integrable and is continuous on an interval containing , then
Derivative of an inverse: if is continuous and injective on a nondegenerate interval and differentiable at with , then the inverse is differentiable at with ; and if then is not differentiable at
The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when
Intermediate value theorem, by bisection with a canonical left-half rule: a continuous function on takes every value between and
Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and for any primitive
On an interval , for continuous on and differentiable at every interior point: throughout gives nondecreasing, gives increasing, and give the two decreasing forms; conversely a nondecreasing has and a nonincreasing has wherever it is differentiable, and no strict converse is claimed
The principal inverse tangent
Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine
The addition formulas for sine and cosine
The subtraction formulas for sine and cosine
Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine
Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine
Tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant on their exact natural domains
Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms
For and integrable when , ; for , is integrable
If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz
If on and both are integrable then ; and
If on then for every partition ; in particular every constant function is integrable, with
Compact continuation for locally Lipschitz ODEs: a solution whose graph stays in a compact subset of the domain near a finite endpoint extends past it
The squared cross-product norm is the Gram determinant of two vectors
and for with the Euclidean metric are complete, componentwise from the Cauchy criterion in
The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Richard Fitzpatrick, Newtonian Dynamics (University of Texas at Austin), §6.4, Eqs. (358)-(366): the inverse-square scattering integral, the Rutherford angle relation and the asymptotic distance
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §3.5, Eqs. (3.68)-(3.69): the scattering integral for the Coulomb potential, $\tan(\theta/2)=\alpha/(2Eb)$