Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Repulsive Coulomb scattering: the unique outer turning point, global non-colliding motion, the asymptotic impact distance and Δ=π/2−arctan⁡(κ/(2Eb))

Statement

Let μ>0, let κ>0 and U(r)=κ/r on (0,∞) (the repulsive Coulomb potential, of class C2), let E>0 and J>0, and put V(r):=κr+J22μr2,b:=J2μE>0,α:=κEb>0. Then:

  1. V is strictly decreasing on (0,∞), with V(r)→∞ as r↓0 and V(r)→0 as r→∞; hence there is exactly one r∗>0 with V(r∗)=E, it is simple (V′(r∗)<0), and V(r)<E for all r>r∗.

  2. Let r:I→R3 be a central-force trajectory for (μ,U) with constant angular momentum j=Je3, J>0, energy E, with ∣r(t)∣≥r∗ for all t∈I and with ∣r(t∗)∣=r∗ for some t∗∈I. Then r extends uniquely to all of R; along the extension ρ=∣r∣≥r∗>0 (no collision), ρ is strictly decreasing on (−∞,t∗] and strictly increasing on [t∗,∞), and the asymptotic velocities v±=lim⁡t→±∞r′(t) exist with ∣v+∣=∣v−∣=2E/μ. Moreover the asymptotic perpendicular distance of each branch to its limiting direction exists and equals b=J2μE=Jμ∣v±∣,so thatJ=μb∣v±∣. The distance in clause 2 means the limit of ∣r(t)×v±∣/∣v±∣ as t→±∞, the distance to the line through the origin in the limiting velocity direction; it does not assert a free tail or a finite longitudinal intercept.

  3. For the polar angle, with u∗:=1/r∗, Δ:=∫r∗∞J drr22μ (E−V(r))=∫0u∗b du1−κEu−b2u2=π2−arctan⁡κ2Eb.

  4. Write n±=lim⁡t→±∞r(t)/∣r(t)∣. Then n+=v+/∣v+∣, n−=−v−/∣v−∣, and in an oriented polar plane the outgoing velocity direction is the incoming direction rotated by 2Δ−π∈(−π,0). In particular ⟨v−,v+⟩∣v−∣∣v+∣=cos⁡(π−2Δ),θs=π−2Δ=2arctan⁡κ2Eb. For fixed μ,κ,E this gives an actual family for every b>0, with angular momentum J(b)=2μE b: choose its unique turning radius and initial data r(0)=r∗e1, r′(0)=J(b)e2/(μr∗). Local existence and the extension in clause 2 give a member of the family for every b, unique up to apsis time and oriented plane placement.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The repulsive Coulomb data μ,κ,E,J, the effective potential V, the outer turning point r∗, and a scattering trajectory with apsis time t∗.

[L1]

Polar reduction and energy: r=ρ n(θ), ρ=∣r∣, ρ2θ′=J/μ, μρ′′=−V′(ρ), E=12μ(ρ′)2+V(ρ) (Polar reduction of a non-radial central-force trajectory: ρ2θ′=J/μ, the effective-potential equation and energy conservation); here V=UJeff (Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential).

[L3]

The Cartesian field G(x,v):=(v,κx/(μ∣x∣3)) is defined on the open set D:={(x,v):∣x∣>0} and is C1 there. Its acceleration derivative is Dx(κx/(μ∣x∣3))[h]=κμ(∣x∣−3h−3∣x∣−5x⟨x,h⟩). Thus DG is bounded on a sufficiently small convex ball about each point of D; along a segment in such a ball, the chain rule and the vector-valued fundamental theorem of calculus give G(z)−G(w)=∫01DG(w+s(z−w))(z−w) ds, and the norm inequality for vector integrals gives a finite Lipschitz bound. Hence G is locally Lipschitz, so Picard–Lindelöf uniqueness and compact continuation apply on D (Compact continuation for locally Lipschitz ODEs: a solution whose graph stays in a compact subset of the domain near a finite endpoint extends past it, Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems, First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals, Local Lipschitz continuity in the state variable, locally uniform in time and parameters, If f:[a,b]→Rm is differentiable with integrable f′ then ∫abf′=f(b)−f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz, For a≤b and f:[a,b]→Rm integrable when a<b, ∥∫abf∥2≤∫ab∥f∥2; for a<b, ∥f∥2 is integrable, Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).

[L5]

Trigonometry (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine gives sin⁡x/x→1 from the derivative at zero): arctan⁡:R→(−π/2,π/2) is the inverse of tan⁡; arcsin⁡, arccos⁡ are the principal inverses; the addition and subtraction formulas hold; sin⁡2+cos⁡2=1; cos⁡ is strictly decreasing on [0,π] and sin⁡ is strictly increasing on [−π/2,π/2] (The principal inverse tangent arctan⁡:R→(−π/2,π/2), Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine, The addition formulas for sine and cosine, The subtraction formulas for sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine, Tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant on their exact natural domains).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL2algebra

The derivative V′(r)=−κ/r2−J2/(μr3) is negative on (0,∞), so V is strictly decreasing by [L2]; κ/r→∞ and J2/(2μr2)→∞ as r↓0, while both terms tend to 0 as r→∞. Hence V is a continuous strictly decreasing bijection (0,∞)→(0,∞); since E>0 lies in the range, r∗=V−1(E) is the unique solution of V=E, it is simple because V′<0 everywhere, and V(r)<E for r>r∗. This is clause 1.

2.1step 1.1L1L3algebra

Global continuation: energy and angular momentum are conserved by [L1], and V(ρ)≤E forces ρ≥r∗ since V is strictly decreasing. Also ∣r′∣≤c:=2E/μ because U>0. At any finite endpoint, ∣r∣ is bounded above by its value at a fixed time plus c times the elapsed time, and r stays at least r∗ from the origin. Thus the Cartesian state (r,r′) stays in a compact subset of {(x,v):∣x∣>0} near that endpoint. The Cartesian field (v,κx/(μ∣x∣3)) is smooth there; compact continuation [L3] extends the solution past every finite right endpoint. For a finite left endpoint apply the same argument to the time-reversed state (r(−s),−r′(−s)), which solves the same autonomous Cartesian system; uniqueness [L3] then makes the global extension unique. The maximal extension therefore has domain R.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L1L2L4algebra

Branch shape: ρ′′=−V′(ρ)/μ>0 for all times by step 1.1. Hence ρ′ is strictly increasing, vanishes at t∗ by the energy identity, is negative before t∗ and positive after it. Consequently the apsis is unique and ρ>r∗ elsewhere. Fixing any t1>t∗ gives ρ′(t)≥ρ′(t1)>0 for t≥t1, so ρ→∞ forward; the same argument backward gives ρ→∞ there. On either open branch, compact substitution [L4] and then limits give ∣t−t∗∣=∫r∗ρ(t)ds/(2/μ)(E−V(s)). Its lower endpoint is integrable since E−V(s) is comparable to s−r∗ by V′(r∗)<0; its upper endpoint diverges since the integrand tends to 1/c>0. This proves the branch and quadrature claims without a finite-range hypothesis.

4.1step 3.1L1L4L6algebra

Asymptotic velocities and their speed: since V(ρ(t))→0 along each branch (as ρ(t)→∞), ∣ρ′∣→2E/μ. Put c:=2E/μ and c0:=c/2>0. The radial-speed limit implies ∣ρ′(t)∣≥c0 for sufficiently large ∣t∣; integrating on each monotone branch gives ρ(t)≥c0∣t∣−C0 for a finite constant C0. In particular ρ(t)≥(c0/2)∣t∣ after increasing the tail cutoff. The acceleration of the Cartesian curve is μr′′=−(U′(ρ)/ρ)r, so ∥r′′∥2=∣U′(ρ)∣/μ=κ/(μρ2)≤C/(1+∣t∣)2 for large ∣t∣, an integrable bound along each half-line; the Cauchy criterion for the vector integral (the integral of r′′ over [s,t] is bounded by ∫st∥r′′∥2) therefore gives existence of v±=lim⁡t→±∞r′(t). Passing to the limit in the energy identity E=12μ∥r′∥22+U(ρ(t)) with U(ρ(t))→0 gives ∣v±∣=2E/μ.

4.2step 3.1L1L4algebra

Half-angle quadrature: on compact subintervals of either open branch use θ′=J/(μρ2) and ∣ρ′∣=(2/μ)(E−V) in [L4]. Taking limits gives the same positive half-angle on both sides of the apsis, Δ=∫r∗∞J dss22μ(E−V(s))=∫0u∗b du1−(κ/E)u−b2u2. Each substitution is first on an interior compact interval. The integral converges at r∗ by the square-root bound of step 3.1 and at infinity by the bound C/s2, so it gives finite limits θ± with θ+−θ∗=θ∗−θ−=Δ.

5.1step 4.2L4L5algebra

Evaluation with scaled roots: put w=bu, A=1+α2/4 and w∗=(α2+4−α)/2=bu∗, where α=κ/(Eb). Then 1−αw−w2=A2−(w+α/2)2. Substitute w+α/2=Asin⁡ψ on interior compact intervals, where ψ∈(ψ0,π/2) and ψ0=arcsin⁡(α/(2A))∈(0,π/2). The derivative is Acos⁡ψ>0 and the positive denominator is Acos⁡ψ, so the integral equals π/2−ψ0 after taking limits. Since sin⁡ψ0=α/α2+4 and cos⁡ψ0=2/α2+4, tan⁡ψ0=α/2, giving ψ0=arctan⁡(α/2) by [L5]. Hence Δ=π/2−arctan⁡(κ/(2Eb))∈(0,π/2). This proves clause 3.

6.1step 4.1step 4.2step 5.1L1L5algebra

Direction limits: differentiating r=ρn(θ) gives r′=ρ′n(θ)+(J/(μρ)) n⊥(θ), where n⊥(θ)=−sin⁡θ e1+cos⁡θ e2. By step 4.1, ρ′→c forward and ρ′→−c backward, while the tangential term tends to zero. Step 4.2 therefore gives v+=c n(θ+) and v−=−c n(θ−). The addition formulas [L5] and θ+−θ−=2Δ show the velocity rotation 2Δ−π and the displayed cosine. There is no hidden extra winding: the radial coefficient ρ′ changes sign only once, the tangential coefficient is always positive, so the velocity direction relative to n(θ) varies continuously from π to 0 through the upper half-plane; its net change is 2Δ−π.

7.1step 3.1step 4.1step 4.2step 6.1L1L4L5L6algebra

Impact limit: put q(s)=(2/μ)(E−V(s)) for s>r∗. On the outgoing branch the remaining angle is Ψ(t)=∫ρ(t)∞J/(μs2q(s)) ds, so ρ(t)Ψ(t)=Jμ∫1∞duu2q(ρ(t)u). As q(s)→c>0, for any ε>0 one has ∣1/q(s)−1/c∣<ε for every s≥S for some S. Once ρ(t)≥S, the difference between the integral above and 1/c is at most ε∫1∞u−2 du=ε. Thus ρΨ→J/(μc) and Ψ→0; the elementary limit sin⁡Ψ/Ψ→1 gives ρsin⁡Ψ→J/(μc)=b. By step 6.1 this is exactly ∣r(t)×v+∣/∣v+∣. The incoming computation uses q=∣ρ′∣ and the remaining angle θ(t)−θ− and gives ∣r(t)×v−∣/∣v−∣→b as well.

8.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 5.1step 6.1step 7.1L1L3algebra∎

For every b>0 set J(b)=2μE b and take the turning radius of clause 1. The initial data stated in clause 4 have angular momentum J(b)e3 and energy V(r∗)=E, radial derivative zero and positive radial second derivative. Local existence [L3] supplies a trajectory and conservation [L1] forces ρ≥r∗; the preceding continuation, angle and impact-limit steps apply to it. Uniqueness [L3] determines it from its apsis state. Thus this actual family realises the deflection formula for all b>0, and all clauses are proved.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources