Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cm Math Central — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The ellipse/period and cross-section checks inherit countable choice from their mathematical suppliers. The companion page to cm-math-central records explicit worked checks of its reduction, Kepler and scattering results. Everything here is mathematics: the examples and the counterexample carry domain: mathematics, depend only on the mathematical items of the parent page and on mathematical suppliers, and make no physical or empirical claim.

The harmonic oscillator action variable Ja(E)=E/ω and Ja′(E)=T/(2π) instantiates The action variable of a two-simple-turning-point family is C1 with derivative T(E)/(2π), the period quadrature over 2π at U(q)=12kq2: the substitution q=2E/k sin⁡ϑ gives Ja(E)=2mEπ2E/k∫−π/2π/2cos⁡2ϑ dϑ=E/ω with ω=k/m, the time quadrature gives T(E)=2π/ω, and differentiation confirms Ja′(E)=1/ω=T(E)/(2π) exactly. An exact Kepler ellipse check: e=1/2, J=1, μ=κ=1 give a=4/3, b=23/3, E=−3/8 and T2=256π2/27 evaluates The Kepler orbit equation is a conic: u=c(1+ecos⁡(φ−θ0)) with E=(μκ2/2J2)(e2−1) and Completeness and periodicity of the negative-energy Kepler orbit, with T=2πμab/J and T2=4π2μa3/κ at μ=κ=J=1, e=12, obtaining p=1, 1−e2=34, a=43, b=233, E=−38, and the same value T2=256π227 from both T=2πμab/J and T2=4π2μa3/κ. An exact Rutherford check: κ=E=1, b=1 give θ=2arctan⁡12 and dσ/dΩ=25/16 evaluates The Rutherford deflection map, its inverse, the cross-section density (κ/4E)2csc⁡4(θ/2) and the divergence of the total cross-section at κ=E=b=1: θdef(1)=2arctan⁡12, b(θdef(1))=12cot⁡(arctan⁡12)=1, and dσ/dΩ=(1/4)2csc⁡4(arctan⁡(1/2))=2516, using csc⁡2(arctan⁡12)=1+cot⁡2(arctan⁡12)=5.

A zero-angular-momentum Kepler trajectory reaches the force centre in finite time, refuting unconditional global existence is the counterexample that marks the excluded radial degenerate case of the Kepler layer: the curve r(t)=A(1−t)2/3e1 on (−∞,1) solves the attractive inverse-square equation μr′′=−κr/∣r∣3 with angular momentum j≡0, reaches the force centre at t=1 in finite time and has no extension to an interval containing 1; it refutes the claim that every attractive inverse-square trajectory is global, collision-free and a conic, and it shows why the non-radial hypothesis J>0 of the positive results is not removable.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedOpen item page →

The harmonic oscillator action variable Ja(E)=E/ω and Ja′(E)=T/(2π)

Example

Let m>0, k>0, U(q)=12kq2 on J0=R, and for E>0 set a(E):=−2Ek,b(E):=2Ek,ω:=km,T:=2πω. Then the datum (J0,U,m,a,b) satisfies the hypotheses of The action variable of a two-simple-turning-point family is C1 with derivative T(E)/(2π), the period quadrature over 2π on every bounded open interval (E0,E1) with 0<E0<E1<∞. These restrictions define the same action on overlaps, hence together give a C1 function on (0,∞); the action variable of The one-dimensional action variable of a family of two-turning-point energy levels is Ja(E)=Eω(E>0), and Ja′(E)=1ω=T2π(E>0), in agreement with the general theorem, whose period quadrature is T(E)=2m∫a(E)b(E)dq/E−U(q)=2π/ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Positive m,k, the quadratic potential U(q)=12kq2, the turning-point functions ±2E/k, and the frequency ω=k/m.

[L1]

Action variable and theorem: Ja(E)=1π∫a(E)b(E)2m(E−U(q)) dq, and under the two simple turning points of this datum, Ja′(E)=T(E)/(2π) with T(E)=2m∫a(E)b(E)dq/E−U(q) (The one-dimensional action variable of a family of two-turning-point energy levels, The action variable of a two-simple-turning-point family is C1 with derivative T(E)/(2π), the period quadrature over 2π).

[L3]

2E/k⋅k/2=E and 2mE⋅E=2m E; for E>0 the square roots are the positive ones (Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenL1algebra

Fix any bounded energy interval (E0,E1) with 0<E0<E1<∞. Restrict a,b to that interval. The datum satisfies the hypotheses of the theorem: U is C3 with U′(q)=kq, so U′(a(E))=−k2E/k<0<k2E/k=U′(b(E)), and a(E)<b(E); moreover 12kq2<E exactly for a(E)<q<b(E), and U(a(E))=U(b(E))=E. Every E>0 lies in such an interval, for example (E/2,2E), and the defining integrals agree on overlaps; thus the theorem gives a C1 action on all of (0,∞).

2.1step 1.1L2L3algebra

Computation of the action variable: substituting q=2E/k sin⁡ϑ by [L2] and using 12kq2=Esin⁡2ϑ, Ja(E)=1π∫−π/2π/22mEcos⁡2ϑ 2Ekcos⁡ϑ dϑ=2mEπ2Ek∫−π/2π/2cos⁡2ϑ dϑ, because cos⁡2ϑ=cos⁡ϑ≥0 on the interval. With cos⁡2ϑ=12(1+cos⁡2ϑ) the integral is π/2, so by [L3] Ja(E)=2mE 2E/k2=2Em/k2=Eω.

2.2step 1.1L2L3algebra

Period quadrature: put A=2E/k. For −π/2<c<d<π/2 the substitution q=Asin⁡ϑ lies strictly between the turning points, where the integrand is continuous and cos⁡ϑ>0. Hence [L2] gives ∫Asin⁡cAsin⁡ddq/E−kq2/2=2/k(d−c), since Ecos⁡2ϑ=Ecos⁡ϑ there. Taking the independent limits c↓−π/2, d↑π/2 proves convergence at both endpoints and gives ∫a(E)b(E)dq/E−kq2/2=π2/k. Thus T(E)=2m π2/k=2π/ω.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2L1algebra∎

Differentiating the closed form of step 2.1, Ja′(E)=1/ω for every E>0; by step 2.2 this equals T(E)/(2π), consistent with the general theorem [L1], which the datum satisfies by step 1.1.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedOpen item page →

An exact Kepler ellipse check: e=1/2, J=1, μ=κ=1 give a=4/3, b=23/3, E=−3/8 and T2=256π2/27

Example

Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), as required by the ellipse-area and period suppliers; the conic-and-eccentricity theorem does not impose this hypothesis.

Take the attractive Kepler data μ=κ=1 and angular momentum magnitude J=1, and consider the negative-energy orbit with eccentricity e=12. Then the conic data of The Kepler orbit equation is a conic: u=c(1+ecos⁡(φ−θ0)) with E=(μκ2/2J2)(e2−1) and The subcritical Kepler conic is an ellipse with semiaxes a=p/(1−e2), b=a1−e2, focus at the origin and area πab; its area is also 12∫02πϱ2 are p=J2μκ=1,a=p1−e2=43,b=a1−e2=233, the energy is E=μκ22J2(e2−1)=−38, and the period of Completeness and periodicity of the negative-energy Kepler orbit, with T=2πμab/J and T2=4π2μa3/κ satisfies T=2πμabJ=16π39,T2=256π227=4π2μa3κ. All numbers are exact; the example checks algebraic consistency of the three theorems and the sign criterion E<0  ⟺  e<1, and makes no empirical claim.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω. μ=κ=1, J=1, e=12 and the derived constants p=1, a=43, b=233.

[L3]

Square roots: 1−14=32 and (3)2=3 (Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}); cos⁡2+sin⁡2=1 provides the value 1−e2 used below via 1−e2>0 (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L3algebra

With μ=κ=J=1: p=1, 1−e2=34, a=1/(34)=43, 1−e2=32 and b=43⋅32=233.

1.2givenL1algebra

Energy: e2−1=14−1=−34, so E=1⋅12⋅1⋅(−34)=−38<0, consistent with e=12<1 by the equivalence of [L1].

2.1step 1.1L2algebra

Period: μab=43⋅233=839, so T=2π⋅839=16π39; squaring, T2=256π2⋅381=256π227.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L2algebra∎

Independent check of the second period formula: a3=6427, so 4π2μa3/κ=4π2⋅6427=256π227=T2, in agreement with step 2.1 and with [L2].

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

An exact Rutherford check: κ=E=1, b=1 give θ=2arctan⁡12 and dσ/dΩ=25/16

Example

Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) for the cited scattering measures and vocabulary.

Take the repulsive Coulomb data κ=1 and E=1 (with any μ>0 and J=2μ, so that the asymptotic impact distance of Repulsive Coulomb scattering: the unique outer turning point, global non-colliding motion, the asymptotic impact distance and Δ=π/2−arctan⁡(κ/(2Eb)) is b=1). Then the deflection map of The Rutherford deflection map, its inverse, the cross-section density (κ/4E)2csc⁡4(θ/2) and the divergence of the total cross-section has the exact values θdef(1)=2arctan⁡12∈(0,π),π2−Δ=arctan⁡12,Δ=π2−arctan⁡12, the inverse branch satisfies b(θdef(1))=1, and dσdΩ(θdef(1))=(κ4E)2csc⁡4(θdef(1)2)=2516, because θdef(1)/2=arctan⁡12 and csc⁡2(arctan⁡12)=1+cot⁡2(arctan⁡12)=1+4=5.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice for the scattering measures. κ=1, E=1, b=1, the deflection map θdef(b)=2arctan⁡(κ/(2Eb)), the inverse branch b(θ)=κ2Ecot⁡(θ/2), and the half-angle Δ=π/2−arctan⁡(κ/(2Eb)).

[L4]

π−2(π/2−arctan⁡12)=2arctan⁡12 by the subtraction formula and elementary algebra (The subtraction formulas for sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L4algebra

Substituting κ=E=b=1 into [L1]: θdef(1)=2arctan⁡12 and Δ=π2−arctan⁡12; and π−2Δ=2arctan⁡12=θdef(1) by [L4].

2.1step 1.1L2algebra

Inverse check: b(θdef(1))=12cot⁡(arctan⁡12)=12⋅2=1 by [L2].

3.1step 1.1L2L3algebra∎

Density: θdef(1)2=arctan⁡12, so by [L2] csc⁡2(arctan⁡12)=1+cot⁡2(arctan⁡12)=1+4=5; hence csc⁡4=25 and, by [L3] with κ=E=1, dσ/dΩ=(14)2⋅25=2516.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

A zero-angular-momentum Kepler trajectory reaches the force centre in finite time, refuting unconditional global existence

Statement refuted

False statement. Every solution of the attractive inverse-square equation μ r′′=−κ r/∣r∣3 (μ,κ>0) on its maximal interval of definition is defined for all real times and satisfies ∣r(t)∣≥c for some c>0.

The witness has zero angular momentum and reaches the excluded force centre, so the non-radial positive results do not apply. Its inverse-square potential is singular and is not finite-range; this example does not establish the necessity of the simple-turning-point hypothesis in Finite-range scattering: the simple outer turning point, the two global branches and the free tails.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Parameters μ>0, κ>0, the constant A:=(9κ/(2μ))1/3>0, and the curve r:(−∞,1)→R3, r(t):=A(1−t)2/3e1, where e1 is a unit vector.

[L1]

The central-force equation in the radial case: for a curve r=ρ e1 with ρ>0 of class C2, the equation μr′′=−κr/∣r∣3 is equivalent to μρ′′=−κ/ρ2, and the angular momentum μr×r′ vanishes identically (Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).

[L3]

For t<1, A3(1−t)2=9κ2μ(1−t)2 and, equivalently, 2μA9=κA2: this is the defining relation of A, and it is an equality of positive real numbers (multiply A3=9κ/(2μ) by 2μ/(9A2)).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L2L3algebra

The curve solves the equation: by [L2], r′′(t)=−2A9(1−t)−4/3e1, so μr′′=−2μA9(1−t)−4/3e1, while −κr/∣r∣3=−κρ−2e1=−κA2(1−t)−4/3e1 because ρ(t)=A(1−t)2/3. By [L3] the two coefficients agree, so μr′′=−κr/∣r∣3 for every t<1; and the angular momentum vanishes identically.

2.1givenstep 1.1L1algebra

Failure of global existence: ρ(t)=A(1−t)2/3→0 as t↑1, and ρ is strictly positive and C2 on (−∞,1). There is no solution of μr′′=−κr/∣r∣3 on an interval containing 1 whose restriction to (−∞,1) equals r: such a solution would be continuous at 1 with r(1)=lim⁡t↑1r(t)=0, and the equation is undefined at the origin (the right-hand side contains r/∣r∣3). Hence the maximal interval of r is (−∞,1), not R.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Failure of the lower bound: inf⁡t<1ρ(t)=0, so there is no c>0 with ∣r(t)∣≥c on the domain. Together with step 2.1, this refutes the stated universal claim.

Sources