How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cm Math Central — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cm Math Balances
- Cm Math Central
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Convergence: Nets and Filters
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Equivalent Forms of Completeness
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Probability and the Probabilistic Method
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Further Trigonometric Identities and Inverse Functions
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper and Parameter-Dependent Multiple Integrals
- Improper Integrals
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Orthonormal Bases, Parseval and Fourier Series
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Regular Surfaces and Surface Integrals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Real Gamma and Beta Functions
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Volumes of Elementary Solids and Solids of Revolution
2 · Summary
The ellipse/period and cross-section checks inherit countable choice from their mathematical suppliers. The companion page to cm-math-central records explicit worked checks of its
reduction, Kepler and scattering results. Everything here is mathematics: the
examples and the counterexample carry domain: mathematics, depend only on the
mathematical items of the parent page and on mathematical suppliers, and make
no physical or empirical claim.
The harmonic oscillator action variable and instantiates The action variable of a two-simple-turning-point family is with derivative , the period quadrature over at : the substitution gives with , the time quadrature gives , and differentiation confirms exactly. An exact Kepler ellipse check: , , give , , and evaluates The Kepler orbit equation is a conic: with and Completeness and periodicity of the negative-energy Kepler orbit, with and at , , obtaining , , , , , and the same value from both and . An exact Rutherford check: , give and evaluates The Rutherford deflection map, its inverse, the cross-section density and the divergence of the total cross-section at : , , and , using .
A zero-angular-momentum Kepler trajectory reaches the force centre in finite time, refuting unconditional global existence is the counterexample that marks the excluded radial degenerate case of the Kepler layer: the curve on solves the attractive inverse-square equation with angular momentum , reaches the force centre at in finite time and has no extension to an interval containing ; it refutes the claim that every attractive inverse-square trajectory is global, collision-free and a conic, and it shows why the non-radial hypothesis of the positive results is not removable.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
The harmonic oscillator action variable and
Example
Let , , on , and for set Then the datum satisfies the hypotheses of The action variable of a two-simple-turning-point family is with derivative , the period quadrature over on every bounded open interval with . These restrictions define the same action on overlaps, hence together give a function on ; the action variable of The one-dimensional action variable of a family of two-turning-point energy levels is and in agreement with the general theorem, whose period quadrature is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Positive , the quadratic potential , the turning-point functions , and the frequency .
Action variable and theorem: , and under the two simple turning points of this datum, with (The one-dimensional action variable of a family of two-turning-point energy levels, The action variable of a two-simple-turning-point family is with derivative , the period quadrature over ).
Substitution with on , where , is a differentiable monotone change of variable, and from the addition formula; the Taylor-free identities and the endpoint values , hold (Substitution: if is differentiable on with integrable and is continuous on an interval containing , then , The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , The addition formulas for sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine).
and ; for the square roots are the positive ones (Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are ).
Verification
Fix any bounded energy interval with . Restrict to that interval. The datum satisfies the hypotheses of the theorem: is with , so , and ; moreover exactly for , and . Every lies in such an interval, for example , and the defining integrals agree on overlaps; thus the theorem gives a action on all of .
Computation of the action variable: substituting by [L2] and using , because on the interval. With the integral is , so by [L3]
Period quadrature: put . For the substitution lies strictly between the turning points, where the integrand is continuous and . Hence [L2] gives , since there. Taking the independent limits , proves convergence at both endpoints and gives . Thus .
Differentiating the closed form of step 2.1, for every ; by step 2.2 this equals , consistent with the general theorem [L1], which the datum satisfies by step 1.1.
An exact Kepler ellipse check: , , give , , and
Example
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), as required by the ellipse-area and period suppliers; the conic-and-eccentricity theorem does not impose this hypothesis.
Take the attractive Kepler data and angular momentum magnitude , and consider the negative-energy orbit with eccentricity . Then the conic data of The Kepler orbit equation is a conic: with and The subcritical Kepler conic is an ellipse with semiaxes , , focus at the origin and area ; its area is also are the energy is , and the period of Completeness and periodicity of the negative-energy Kepler orbit, with and satisfies All numbers are exact; the example checks algebraic consistency of the three theorems and the sign criterion , and makes no empirical claim.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume . , , and the derived constants , , .
Conic and eccentricity: for a non-radial attractive Kepler trajectory with , , , and (The Kepler orbit equation is a conic: with , The subcritical Kepler conic is an ellipse with semiaxes , , focus at the origin and area ; its area is also , Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential).
Square roots: and (Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are ); provides the value used below via (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine).
Verification
With : , , , and .
Energy: , so , consistent with by the equivalence of [L1].
Period: , so ; squaring, .
Independent check of the second period formula: , so , in agreement with step 2.1 and with [L2].
An exact Rutherford check: , give and
Example
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) for the cited scattering measures and vocabulary.
Take the repulsive Coulomb data and (with any and , so that the asymptotic impact distance of Repulsive Coulomb scattering: the unique outer turning point, global non-colliding motion, the asymptotic impact distance and is ). Then the deflection map of The Rutherford deflection map, its inverse, the cross-section density and the divergence of the total cross-section has the exact values the inverse branch satisfies , and because and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice for the scattering measures. , , , the deflection map , the inverse branch , and the half-angle .
Deflection and half-angle: and , with (The Rutherford deflection map, its inverse, the cross-section density and the divergence of the total cross-section, Repulsive Coulomb scattering: the unique outer turning point, global non-colliding motion, the asymptotic impact distance and , Scattering data: the incident flux measure, the solid-angle element, deflection branches and the cross-section density).
The cross-section density is on the branch (The Rutherford deflection map, its inverse, the cross-section density and the divergence of the total cross-section).
by the subtraction formula and elementary algebra (The subtraction formulas for sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).
Verification
Substituting into [L1]: and ; and by [L4].
Inverse check: by [L2].
Density: , so by [L2] ; hence and, by [L3] with , .
A zero-angular-momentum Kepler trajectory reaches the force centre in finite time, refuting unconditional global existence
Statement refuted
False statement. Every solution of the attractive inverse-square equation () on its maximal interval of definition is defined for all real times and satisfies for some .
The witness has zero angular momentum and reaches the excluded force centre, so the non-radial positive results do not apply. Its inverse-square potential is singular and is not finite-range; this example does not establish the necessity of the simple-turning-point hypothesis in Finite-range scattering: the simple outer turning point, the two global branches and the free tails.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Parameters , , the constant , and the curve , , where is a unit vector.
The central-force equation in the radial case: for a curve with of class , the equation is equivalent to , and the angular momentum vanishes identically (Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential, Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).
Power derivatives: for , and , by the real-power derivative and the chain rule (Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set, Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of , Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).
For , and, equivalently, : this is the defining relation of , and it is an equality of positive real numbers (multiply by ).
Counterexample
The curve solves the equation: by [L2], , so , while because . By [L3] the two coefficients agree, so for every ; and the angular momentum vanishes identically.
Failure of global existence: as , and is strictly positive and on . There is no solution of on an interval containing whose restriction to equals : such a solution would be continuous at with , and the equation is undefined at the origin (the right-hand side contains ). Hence the maximal interval of is , not .
Failure of the lower bound: , so there is no with on the domain. Together with step 2.1, this refutes the stated universal claim.
Sources
- David Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge), §4.5.1 and §4.5.3, printed pp. 105-111: the harmonic oscillator action variable and the period relation $\mathrm dE/\mathrm dI=\omega$
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §3.4, Eqs. (3.59)-(3.65): the eccentricity, semimajor axis and period relations checked numerically here with exact rational data
- Richard Fitzpatrick, Newtonian Dynamics (University of Texas at Austin), §6.4, Eqs. (358)-(365): the Rutherford angle and density, checked here at exact rational data
- David Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge), §2.5.4, printed pp. 32-33: the angular-momentum barrier and the separation of the radial and angular problems