Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An exact Kepler ellipse check: e=1/2, J=1, μ=κ=1 give a=4/3, b=23/3, E=−3/8 and T2=256π2/27

Example

Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), as required by the ellipse-area and period suppliers; the conic-and-eccentricity theorem does not impose this hypothesis.

Take the attractive Kepler data μ=κ=1 and angular momentum magnitude J=1, and consider the negative-energy orbit with eccentricity e=12. Then the conic data of The Kepler orbit equation is a conic: u=c(1+ecos⁡(φ−θ0)) with E=(μκ2/2J2)(e2−1) and The subcritical Kepler conic is an ellipse with semiaxes a=p/(1−e2), b=a1−e2, focus at the origin and area πab; its area is also 12∫02πϱ2 are p=J2μκ=1,a=p1−e2=43,b=a1−e2=233, the energy is E=μκ22J2(e2−1)=−38, and the period of Completeness and periodicity of the negative-energy Kepler orbit, with T=2πμab/J and T2=4π2μa3/κ satisfies T=2πμabJ=16π39,T2=256π227=4π2μa3κ. All numbers are exact; the example checks algebraic consistency of the three theorems and the sign criterion E<0  ⟺  e<1, and makes no empirical claim.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω. μ=κ=1, J=1, e=12 and the derived constants p=1, a=43, b=233.

[L3]

Square roots: 1−14=32 and (3)2=3 (Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}); cos⁡2+sin⁡2=1 provides the value 1−e2 used below via 1−e2>0 (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L3algebra

With μ=κ=J=1: p=1, 1−e2=34, a=1/(34)=43, 1−e2=32 and b=43⋅32=233.

1.2givenL1algebra

Energy: e2−1=14−1=−34, so E=1⋅12⋅1⋅(−34)=−38<0, consistent with e=12<1 by the equivalence of [L1].

2.1step 1.1L2algebra

Period: μab=43⋅233=839, so T=2π⋅839=16π39; squaring, T2=256π2⋅381=256π227.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L2algebra∎

Independent check of the second period formula: a3=6427, so 4π2μa3/κ=4π2⋅6427=256π227=T2, in agreement with step 2.1 and with [L2].

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources