How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The subcritical Kepler conic is an ellipse with semiaxes , , focus at the origin and area ; its area is also
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let and , and put
- is , -periodic, and .
- Let and . Then is Lebesgue measurable, and for the closed unit disc and one has ; consequently .
- For every , the ray meets in the unique point ; that point satisfies , and .
Thus the conic is the ellipse with centre , semiaxes , its right focus at the origin, and enclosed area .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The constants , , , , the profile , and the region .
Substitution and completion of the square: for all ; equivalently . [algebra]
Assuming countable choice, a diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for functions; the polar map is a diffeomorphism of onto its image (injective there, with nonsingular derivative, hence a diffeomorphism onto its open image by the injective-regular theorem); and a continuous function on a product with a nonnegative area element may be integrated iteratively by Tonelli (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions, An injective regular map is a diffeomorphism onto its image, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
A line in is Lebesgue null, and so is every subset of it (Every affine hyperplane of , and hence every proper linear subspace, is Lebesgue null); an invertible linear map scales Lebesgue measure by the absolute determinant, and the closed unit disc has measure (A linear map of sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with when is invertible and Lebesgue null when it is not, The closed form for the volume of the unit -ball).
is differentiable with , is -periodic, and ranges over ; (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine); sums, products and quotients of functions with nonvanishing denominator are (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point, Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).
Proof
Clause 1: is a quotient of functions with denominator , hence by [L4]; it is -periodic because is; and because .
Clause 2, the identity : by [L1], for , , so if and only if , that is, ; hence exactly when for some , since is a bijection of onto itself (its linear part is invertible, ).
Clause 3, the radial description: for put . Using [L4], , a quadratic in with positive leading coefficient (since ) and negative constant term ; hence the set of with is the interval : indeed is the unique positive root of , because substituting and multiplying by gives a direct expansion — and while as , so the two roots have opposite signs and the positive one is . Therefore , the boundary is the displayed profile, and each ray meets it exactly once.
Clause 2, the area: is an affine map with invertible linear part, hence a diffeomorphism of with everywhere; is closed (so Lebesgue measurable with indicator in ), and by step 1.2. The change-of-variables formula of [L2] applied to the indicator of gives ; the closed unit disc has by [L3], so .
Clause 3, the polar area formula: let and , where is the restriction of the polar map of [L2]. The set is Borel because is continuous, and is Borel because is a homeomorphism from onto its image. Since by step 1.3 and has finite measure by step 2.1, is integrable. The change-of-variables formula [L2] applied on gives the middle equality by Tonelli [L2] applied to the nonnegative function . By step 1.3, is contained in the closed positive -axis, including the origin, a subset of a line and hence null by [L3]. Therefore , which is clause 3.
Depends on
The Kepler orbit equation is a conic: with
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions
Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
An injective regular map is a diffeomorphism onto its image
Every affine hyperplane of , and hence every proper linear subspace, is Lebesgue null
A linear map of sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with when is invertible and Lebesgue null when it is not
The closed form for the volume of the unit -ball
The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine
Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine
Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine
The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when
Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Konstantin Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics: Classical Mechanics, §3.4, Eqs. (3.59)-(3.65) and Fig. 8: the elliptic branch $E<0$, $e<1$, with the turning radii and the ellipse geometry
- Richard Fitzpatrick, Newtonian Dynamics (University of Texas at Austin), §5.5 and §5.6: the elliptic orbit of the Kepler problem, its semiaxes and the focus at the force centre