Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The harmonic oscillator action variable Ja(E)=E/ω and Ja′(E)=T/(2π)

Example

Let m>0, k>0, U(q)=12kq2 on J0=R, and for E>0 set a(E):=−2Ek,b(E):=2Ek,ω:=km,T:=2πω. Then the datum (J0,U,m,a,b) satisfies the hypotheses of The action variable of a two-simple-turning-point family is C1 with derivative T(E)/(2π), the period quadrature over 2π on every bounded open interval (E0,E1) with 0<E0<E1<∞. These restrictions define the same action on overlaps, hence together give a C1 function on (0,∞); the action variable of The one-dimensional action variable of a family of two-turning-point energy levels is Ja(E)=Eω(E>0), and Ja′(E)=1ω=T2π(E>0), in agreement with the general theorem, whose period quadrature is T(E)=2m∫a(E)b(E)dq/E−U(q)=2π/ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Positive m,k, the quadratic potential U(q)=12kq2, the turning-point functions ±2E/k, and the frequency ω=k/m.

[L1]

Action variable and theorem: Ja(E)=1π∫a(E)b(E)2m(E−U(q)) dq, and under the two simple turning points of this datum, Ja′(E)=T(E)/(2π) with T(E)=2m∫a(E)b(E)dq/E−U(q) (The one-dimensional action variable of a family of two-turning-point energy levels, The action variable of a two-simple-turning-point family is C1 with derivative T(E)/(2π), the period quadrature over 2π).

[L3]

2E/k⋅k/2=E and 2mE⋅E=2m E; for E>0 the square roots are the positive ones (Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenL1algebra

Fix any bounded energy interval (E0,E1) with 0<E0<E1<∞. Restrict a,b to that interval. The datum satisfies the hypotheses of the theorem: U is C3 with U′(q)=kq, so U′(a(E))=−k2E/k<0<k2E/k=U′(b(E)), and a(E)<b(E); moreover 12kq2<E exactly for a(E)<q<b(E), and U(a(E))=U(b(E))=E. Every E>0 lies in such an interval, for example (E/2,2E), and the defining integrals agree on overlaps; thus the theorem gives a C1 action on all of (0,∞).

2.1step 1.1L2L3algebra

Computation of the action variable: substituting q=2E/k sin⁡ϑ by [L2] and using 12kq2=Esin⁡2ϑ, Ja(E)=1π∫−π/2π/22mEcos⁡2ϑ 2Ekcos⁡ϑ dϑ=2mEπ2Ek∫−π/2π/2cos⁡2ϑ dϑ, because cos⁡2ϑ=cos⁡ϑ≥0 on the interval. With cos⁡2ϑ=12(1+cos⁡2ϑ) the integral is π/2, so by [L3] Ja(E)=2mE 2E/k2=2Em/k2=Eω.

2.2step 1.1L2L3algebra

Period quadrature: put A=2E/k. For −π/2<c<d<π/2 the substitution q=Asin⁡ϑ lies strictly between the turning points, where the integrand is continuous and cos⁡ϑ>0. Hence [L2] gives ∫Asin⁡cAsin⁡ddq/E−kq2/2=2/k(d−c), since Ecos⁡2ϑ=Ecos⁡ϑ there. Taking the independent limits c↓−π/2, d↑π/2 proves convergence at both endpoints and gives ∫a(E)b(E)dq/E−kq2/2=π2/k. Thus T(E)=2m π2/k=2π/ω.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2L1algebra∎

Differentiating the closed form of step 2.1, Ja′(E)=1/ω for every E>0; by step 2.2 this equals T(E)/(2π), consistent with the general theorem [L1], which the datum satisfies by step 1.1.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources