How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A zero-angular-momentum Kepler trajectory reaches the force centre in finite time, refuting unconditional global existence
Statement refuted
False statement. Every solution of the attractive inverse-square equation () on its maximal interval of definition is defined for all real times and satisfies for some .
The witness has zero angular momentum and reaches the excluded force centre, so the non-radial positive results do not apply. Its inverse-square potential is singular and is not finite-range; this example does not establish the necessity of the simple-turning-point hypothesis in Finite-range scattering: the simple outer turning point, the two global branches and the free tails.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Parameters , , the constant , and the curve , , where is a unit vector.
The central-force equation in the radial case: for a curve with of class , the equation is equivalent to , and the angular momentum vanishes identically (Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential, Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).
Power derivatives: for , and , by the real-power derivative and the chain rule (Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set, Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of , Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).
For , and, equivalently, : this is the defining relation of , and it is an equality of positive real numbers (multiply by ).
Counterexample
The curve solves the equation: by [L2], , so , while because . By [L3] the two coefficients agree, so for every ; and the angular momentum vanishes identically.
Failure of global existence: as , and is strictly positive and on . There is no solution of on an interval containing whose restriction to equals : such a solution would be continuous at with , and the equation is undefined at the origin (the right-hand side contains ). Hence the maximal interval of is , not .
Failure of the lower bound: , so there is no with on the domain. Together with step 2.1, this refutes the stated universal claim.
Depends on
Central-force trajectories: the central-force equation, angular momentum, energy and the effective potential
Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set
Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when
Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers
The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with
Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms
Finite-range scattering: the simple outer turning point, the two global branches and the free tails