Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The optimal modified Hamiltonian differs from the original by order two

Statement

Use the splitting data, constants and N(h),Hh of Optimal finite truncation gives an exponential local splitting defect. There are constants CE,CG<∞, independent of 0<h≤a/3, such that on D(ρ/8)

∣Hh−H~∣≤CEh2,∥∇Hh∥≤CG.

In particular Hh is real analytic on the real part. Its additive normalization is Hh(0)=H(0), so the comparison includes constants.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated data and normalized finite sum.

[F1]

Bounds for the truncated logarithm: ∣LN(h)zi/h∣≤8M/3 and ∣Xj∣≤(8M/3)(C0Mj/ρ)j−1 gives max⁡i∣(Xj)i∣≤(8M/3)(C0Mj/ρ)j−1 for j≥2 on the common inner domain; Each coefficient field Xj of the modified logarithm is a holomorphic symplectic field with a global holomorphic primitive Hj on the star-shaped domain, and X1=XA~+B~ gives ∥∇Hj∥≤2dβj and ∣Hj(Z)∣≤2dβj∥Z∥.

[F2]

Symmetry of the splitting map forces Xj=0 for every even j, so the first possible modified-energy correction is of order h2 gives X2=H2=0, and realness and holomorphy of all primitives are proved in the primitive lemma.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

Summable correction. Put b=C0M/ρ and uj=(bhj)j−1 for j≥3. Direct division gives uj+1/uj=bh(j+1)(1+1/j)j−1≤ebh(j+1). For j<N, h(j+1)≤hN≤a, so this ratio is at most eC0/C2<1/2. Therefore ∑j=3Nuj≤2u3=18b2h2, with the empty sum understood as zero.

2.1step 1.1F1F2algebra∎

Hamiltonian comparison. The bounded set D(ρ/8) has R=sup⁡Z∈D(ρ/8)∥Z∥<∞, since U is bounded. By [F1], [F2] and step 1.1, ∣Hh−H~∣≤R2d(8M/3)18b2h2, and the same bound without R controls ∥∇(Hh−H~)∥. As ∥XH~∥≤2M and J is an isometry, ∥∇H~∥≤2M. The gradient is therefore bounded independently of h after fixing h≤a/3. Reality, analyticity and normalization follow term by term in the finite sum.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources