Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A curve solves Hamilton's equations if and only if its velocity annihilates d(p⋅dq−H dt), with the three coordinate components computed

Statement

Let J⊆R be a nonempty open interval, let W⊆R2n be open and nonempty with coordinates z=(q,p)=(q1,…,qn,p1,…,pn), and let H:J×W→R be of class C1 (Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn). On J×W let α:=∑i=1npi dqi−H dt, a coordinate one-form with C1 coefficients. Define its coordinate exterior derivative by dα:=∑a<b(∂aαb−∂bαa) dya∧dyb in the ordered coordinates y=(t,q1,…,qn,p1,…,pn); this is a continuous coordinate two-form, using the same alternating multilinear convention as A smooth differential k-form but making no smooth-form claim. In expanded form, set

σ:=dα=∑i=1ndpi∧dqi+∑i=1nHqi dt∧dqi+∑i=1nHpi dt∧dpi.

Every coefficient of σ is continuous because H is C1. Let J′⊆J be a nonempty open interval and let z:J′→W be a C1 curve. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. z satisfies Hamilton's equations on J′: q˙i(t)=Hpi(t,z(t)) and p˙i(t)=−Hqi(t,z(t)) for i=1,…,n and every t∈J′;
  2. for every t∈J′ the covector ι(1,z˙(t))σ vanishes, that is σ(t,z(t))((1,z˙(t)),w)=0 for every w∈R×R2n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The open sets J⊆R and W⊆R2n, the C1 function H, the two-form σ, and a C1 curve z:J′→W.

[F1]

Coordinates and forms (A smooth differential k-form, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms): the coordinate exterior derivative of a C1 one-form is defined by antisymmetrizing its first coefficient derivatives; applied to α=∑ipidqi−Hdt, it gives the continuous two-form σ=∑idpi∧dqi+∑iHqidt∧dqi+∑iHpidt∧dpi, and dH=Htdt+∑i(Hqidqi+Hpidpi). The standard basis at a point is ∂t,∂q1,…,∂qn,∂p1,…,∂pn.

[F2]

Curves (First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals, Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length, The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case): z is differentiable on the interval J′ with derivative z˙; the tangent vector (1,z˙(t)) of the graph curve t↦(t,z(t)) has components (1,q˙1,…,q˙n,p˙1,…,p˙n).

Proof

technique · direct. Compute the two-form in coordinates, evaluate its contraction with the graph velocity on the standard basis vectors, and read off Hamilton's equations
1.1F1algebra

By [F1] and the defining coordinate formula, dα=∑idpi∧dqi−dH∧dt=∑idpi∧dqi−Htdt∧dt−∑iHqidqi∧dt−∑iHpidpi∧dt; since dt∧dt=0, dqi∧dt=−dt∧dqi and dpi∧dt=−dt∧dpi, this is the continuous two-form σ displayed in the Statement.

2.1F1F2algebra

Write v:=(1,z˙(t)). Evaluating the three types of basis vectors with the coordinate expression of step 1.1: σ(v,∂qi)=dpi(v) dqi(∂qi)−dH∧dt(v,∂qi)=p˙i+Hqi, because dpi(v)=p˙i, dqi(∂qi)=1 and (dH∧dt)(v,∂qi)=dH(v)⋅0−1⋅Hqi; σ(v,∂pi)=dpi(v)dqi(∂pi)−(dH∧dt)(v,∂pi)=0−q˙i⋅1+Hpi=Hpi−q˙i; and σ(v,∂t)=∑jdpj(v)dqj(∂t)−∑jdqj(v)dpj(∂t)−(dH∧dt)(v,∂t)=−(Hqiq˙i+Hpip˙i) summed over i, the dq,dp terms vanishing because ∂t is annihilated by dqj,dpj.

3.1step 2.1algebra

Equivalence: if z satisfies Hamilton's equations, then step 2.1 gives σ(v,∂qi)=0, σ(v,∂pi)=0 and σ(v,∂t)=0, so the covector vanishes on the whole basis and (2) holds; conversely if (2) holds, then σ(v,∂qi)=0 and σ(v,∂pi)=0 give p˙i=−Hqi and q˙i=Hpi for every i and t, which is (1).

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Collecting step 1.1, step 2.1 and step 3.1 proves the two-form identity, the component computations and the equivalence.

Remarks

  • Sign conventions. The two-form is σ=∑idpi∧dqi−dH∧dt, the exterior derivative of the Poincare-Cartan one-form ∑ipidqi−H dt; the component signs above match the convention in which the one-form is the phase-space action integrand, as in the cited treatments. No symplectic form ω is used in the statement or the proof, so this lemma is independent of the sign convention ιXω=dH.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources