Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Maximum endpoint influence for an increasing finite-box set

Statement

Let n≥2 be an integer and let C⊆[0,1]n be coordinatewise increasing and a finite union of axis-parallel boxes, with specified open or closed endpoint conventions. Degenerate boxes are allowed. Let vr denote elementary r-dimensional box volume: a box has the product of its side lengths as volume, and finite unions are evaluated by a common coordinate-endpoint subdivision, with coordinate faces assigned volume zero. Put f=1C, a=vn(C), and

Fi=vn−1{x−i∈[0,1]n−1:f(x−i,1)−f(x−i,0)=1},M=max⁡1≤i≤nFi.

If M=0, then a(1−a)=0. If M>0, then

a(1−a)≤2∑i=1nFi1+log⁡(1/M).

In every case,

max⁡1≤i≤nFi≥14a(1−a)log⁡nn.

Logarithms are natural. Endpoint influence uses the actual values on the faces. The assertion and proof use only finite box volumes, finite probability spaces and elementary real calculus; they require no countable product measure or choice principle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer n≥2 and an increasing finite-box set C as in the statement. A rectangular step function is constant on every open cell of a finite coordinate grid, with its restrictions to grid hyperplanes also rectangular step functions in the remaining coordinates. Its elementary integral is the sum of its full-dimensional cell values times products of cell lengths. To integrate an endpoint section, first restrict the actual function to the specified face and then use the same rule in the remaining dimensions. Dimension-zero integration means evaluation. All continuous-cube integrals below have this finite meaning. Norms on finite probability spaces are normalized probability norms.

Proof

1.1givenconstructalgebra

The elementary integral is well-defined: adjoining an endpoint splits an interval into two whose lengths sum to its original length, so finite common refinement leaves each integral unchanged. Indicators of finite-box sets, their fixed-coordinate sections, and their finite products and differences are rectangular step functions. Common refinement proves linearity, positivity and the integral triangle inequality. It also proves equality of iterated and full integrals, because both sum the same finitely many cell values times products of lengths; outer grid endpoints have zero length. A translation preserves side lengths, so a piecewise translation bijectively exchanging finitely many boxes preserves these integrals. These are all the continuous-cube integration rules used below.

1.2givenalgebra

For 1≤p≤2 and real u,v, we prove (u2+(p−1)v2)1/2≤((∣u+v∣p+∣u−v∣p)/2)1/p. At p=1 this follows from the triangle inequality, and at p=2 it is equality. For 1<p<2 signs can be removed. If ∣v∣>∣u∣, interchange their absolute values: the right side is unchanged and the squared left side increases by (2−p)(v2−u2). It therefore suffices to take u>0 and 0≤t=v/u≤1, apart from the trivial zero case. For t<1 put H(t)=((1+t)p+(1−t)p)/2. The convexity of sp−2, obtained by two differentiations, gives H′′(t)≥p(p−1). Since H(0)=1 and H′(0)=0, integration twice gives H(t)≥1+p(p−1)t2/2. Concavity of sp/2 gives (1+(p−1)t2)p/2≤1+p(p−1)t2/2. Multiply by up and take the pth root; continuity includes t=1. This proves the claimed two-point inequality.

2.1step 1.2constructalgebra

On a uniform bit x∈{−1,1} define Tρ(u+vx)=u+ρvx, for 0≤ρ≤1. Step 1.2 with p=1+ρ2 proves ∥Tρh∥2≤∥h∥p. To extend this to d bits, first note that finite-sum Minkowski gives ∥h∥Ly2(Lxp)≤∥h∥Lxp(Ly2) for finite probability spaces and 1≤p≤2: its pth-power form is the triangle inequality for Ex∣h(x,⋅)∣p in Ly2/p. For completeness, finite weighted Minkowski at exponent r>1 follows by multiplying ∣z+w∣≤∣z∣+∣w∣ by ∣z+w∣r−1, summing, applying Hölder and dividing by ∥z+w∥rr−1 if nonzero. Weighted Hölder follows by normalizing the two norms and summing Young's inequality ab≤ar/r+br′/r′, which follows by minimizing ar/r−ab in a≥0; zero norms and r=1 are immediate. If TX,TY contract Lp into L2 on two blocks, apply the X contraction pointwise in y, the mixed-norm inequality, and then the Y contraction pointwise in x to obtain ∥TXTYh∥2≤∥TYh∥Ly2(Lxp)≤∥TYh∥Lxp(Ly2)≤∥h∥p. Induction therefore gives ∥Tρh∥2≤∥h∥1+ρ2 on every finite Boolean cube, where Tρ applies the one-bit operator in each coordinate.

2.2givenstep 1.1constructalgebra

Put N=2m for m≥1 and partition [0,1)n into the dyadic cells Qa=∏i[ai/N,(ai+1)/N), with 0≤ai<N. On Qa let ℓm=f(a/N), um=f((a+1)/N) and gm=Nn∫Qaf. Faces at coordinate one may be assigned arbitrary values for integration. Monotonicity gives ℓm≤f,gm≤um. Telescope each difference um−ℓm one coordinate at a time. For coordinate i, summation over ai at fixed remaining upper/lower corner coordinates telescopes to a difference of values at coordinate one and zero, at most one. There are Nn−1 choices of the other indices, hence ∫(um−ℓm)≤n/N and δm:=∫∣gm−f∣≤n/N. Cell averaging gives ∫gm=∫f=a, while ∣gm2−f2∣≤2∣gm−f∣. Therefore ∣Var⁡(gm)−a(1−a)∣≤2δm→0. This uses an explicit numerical error bound, not a theorem interchanging a limit and an integral.

3.1givenstep 2.1constructalgebra

On {−1,1}d let x(j) flip bit j and set Djh=(h(x)−h(x(j)))/2. Suppose numbers bj∈[0,1] satisfy ∥Djh∥p≤bj1/p/2 for every 1≤p≤2. We will prove Var⁡(h)≤∑jbj/(1+log⁡(1/bj)), interpreting the summand at zero as zero. For S⊆{1,…,d} define χS(x)=∏j∈Sxj. Independence and zero mean of each bit show these 2d functions are orthonormal. Since the function space has dimension 2d, they form a basis; write h=∑Sh^(S)χS. Then Djh=∑S∋jh^(S)χS and TρχS=ρ∣S∣χS. Parseval and finite-sum integration yield the exact identity Var⁡(h)=2∑j∫01∥TρDjh∥22 dρρ, because the coefficient of each h^(S)2 for nonempty S is 2∣S∣∫01ρ2∣S∣−1 dρ=1. These are ordinary one-variable Riemann integrals of finite polynomials after cancellation of the factor ρ; no singularity at zero occurs.

4.1step 1.1step 2.2step 3.1constructalgebra

Identify each cell index ai with its m binary digits, most significant first; the uniform distribution of the nm bits is the uniform distribution of the equal-volume cells. Regard gm as a real function on this finite Boolean cube. For 1≤k≤m, let Rik flip the kth binary digit of coordinate i on [0,1): in every prefix interval of length 21−k translate its lower half up by 2−k and its upper half down by 2−k. Define it arbitrarily at coordinate one. This is a finite piecewise translation preserving elementary integrals, and it pairs the level-m cells with that digit flipped. Let bik=∫∣f−f∘Rik∣. The bit derivative of gm on a cell is the cell average of (f−f∘Rik)/2. For such an average z=∣Q∣−1∫Q(f−f∘Rik), the finite triangle inequality gives ∣z∣≤∣Q∣−1∫Q∣f−f∘Rik∣≤1, so ∣z∣p≤∣z∣ for p≥1. Multiplying by 2−p∣Q∣ and summing cells yields ∥Dikgm∥pp≤2−pbik, the hypothesis of step 3.1.

4.2step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Write Djh=xjgj(x−j). The product noise operator gives TρDjh=ρxjTρgj, so step 2.1 and the norm hypothesis in step 3.1 imply ∥TρDjh∥22≤ρ2bj2/(1+ρ2)/4. For b=bj>0 put L=log⁡(1/b). Its contribution to the integral in step 3.1 is at most 12∫01ρb2/(1+ρ2) dρ≤b4∫01e−Ls/2 ds≤b1+L. The middle inequality substitutes s=1−ρ2 and uses 2/(1+ρ2)≥1+(1−ρ2)/2. The last integral is at most one, proving the last inequality when 0≤L≤1, and at most 2/L, proving it when L≥1. At bj=0 the norm hypothesis gives Djh=0. Summing establishes the variance estimate claimed in step 3.1.

5.1givenstep 1.1step 4.1algebra

Fix the coordinates other than i. The fiber indicator is an increasing zero-one function of one real variable, hence a threshold indicator except possibly at its threshold. If the endpoint values agree it is constant everywhere. Otherwise flipping the kth digit can change its value only in the single prefix interval of length 21−k containing the threshold. If the threshold is a prefix endpoint, disagreement at that endpoint has length zero; other intervals are constant. Thus the disagreement length is at most 21−k(f(x−i,1)−f(x−i,0)). All these sections and disagreement sets are finite-box sets. Finite-sum iterated integration from step 1.1 gives bik≤21−kFi, and consequently ∑k=1mbik≤2Fi and bik≤M.

6.1step 4.2step 2.2step 4.1step 5.1algebra

If M=0, steps 4.1–5.1 make every bit derivative of every gm zero, so every gm is constant, and step 2.2 gives a(1−a)=0. If M>0, apply the variance bound of step 4.2 to gm, using steps 4.1–5.1. Each nonzero denominator is at least 1+log⁡(1/M), giving Var⁡(gm)≤2∑iFi/(1+log⁡(1/M)). Taking the limit with the explicit error in step 2.2 proves the first stated inequality.

7.1step 6.1algebra∎

If 0<M<n−1/2, step 6.1 gives a(1−a)≤4nM/log⁡n, which is the required lower bound on M. If M≥n−1/2, use a(1−a)≤1/4 and log⁡n≤n to get a(1−a)log⁡n/(4n)≤1/(16n)≤M. The elementary bound log⁡t≤t for t≥1 follows by differentiating (log⁡t)/t: its maximum is 2/e<1. The case M=0 was settled in step 6.1. This proves the stated bound for every integer n≥2.

Remarks

The finite-box hypothesis permits every cube integral to be evaluated by finite endpoint subdivision. The only limits are explicit real sequences and one-variable Riemann integrals. This does not assert a choice-free construction of general Lebesgue product measure or the stronger null-invariant influence theorem for arbitrary measurable sets.

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources