How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Maximum endpoint influence for an increasing finite-box set
Statement
Let be an integer and let be coordinatewise increasing and a finite union of axis-parallel boxes, with specified open or closed endpoint conventions. Degenerate boxes are allowed. Let denote elementary -dimensional box volume: a box has the product of its side lengths as volume, and finite unions are evaluated by a common coordinate-endpoint subdivision, with coordinate faces assigned volume zero. Put , , and
If , then . If , then
In every case,
Logarithms are natural. Endpoint influence uses the actual values on the faces. The assertion and proof use only finite box volumes, finite probability spaces and elementary real calculus; they require no countable product measure or choice principle.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer and an increasing finite-box set as in the statement. A rectangular step function is constant on every open cell of a finite coordinate grid, with its restrictions to grid hyperplanes also rectangular step functions in the remaining coordinates. Its elementary integral is the sum of its full-dimensional cell values times products of cell lengths. To integrate an endpoint section, first restrict the actual function to the specified face and then use the same rule in the remaining dimensions. Dimension-zero integration means evaluation. All continuous-cube integrals below have this finite meaning. Norms on finite probability spaces are normalized probability norms.
Proof
The elementary integral is well-defined: adjoining an endpoint splits an interval into two whose lengths sum to its original length, so finite common refinement leaves each integral unchanged. Indicators of finite-box sets, their fixed-coordinate sections, and their finite products and differences are rectangular step functions. Common refinement proves linearity, positivity and the integral triangle inequality. It also proves equality of iterated and full integrals, because both sum the same finitely many cell values times products of lengths; outer grid endpoints have zero length. A translation preserves side lengths, so a piecewise translation bijectively exchanging finitely many boxes preserves these integrals. These are all the continuous-cube integration rules used below.
For and real , we prove . At this follows from the triangle inequality, and at it is equality. For signs can be removed. If , interchange their absolute values: the right side is unchanged and the squared left side increases by . It therefore suffices to take and , apart from the trivial zero case. For put . The convexity of , obtained by two differentiations, gives . Since and , integration twice gives . Concavity of gives . Multiply by and take the th root; continuity includes . This proves the claimed two-point inequality.
On a uniform bit define , for . Step 1.2 with proves . To extend this to bits, first note that finite-sum Minkowski gives for finite probability spaces and : its th-power form is the triangle inequality for in . For completeness, finite weighted Minkowski at exponent follows by multiplying by , summing, applying Hölder and dividing by if nonzero. Weighted Hölder follows by normalizing the two norms and summing Young's inequality , which follows by minimizing in ; zero norms and are immediate. If contract into on two blocks, apply the contraction pointwise in , the mixed-norm inequality, and then the contraction pointwise in to obtain . Induction therefore gives on every finite Boolean cube, where applies the one-bit operator in each coordinate.
Put for and partition into the dyadic cells , with . On let , and . Faces at coordinate one may be assigned arbitrary values for integration. Monotonicity gives . Telescope each difference one coordinate at a time. For coordinate , summation over at fixed remaining upper/lower corner coordinates telescopes to a difference of values at coordinate one and zero, at most one. There are choices of the other indices, hence and . Cell averaging gives , while . Therefore . This uses an explicit numerical error bound, not a theorem interchanging a limit and an integral.
On let flip bit and set . Suppose numbers satisfy for every . We will prove , interpreting the summand at zero as zero. For define . Independence and zero mean of each bit show these functions are orthonormal. Since the function space has dimension , they form a basis; write . Then and . Parseval and finite-sum integration yield the exact identity because the coefficient of each for nonempty is . These are ordinary one-variable Riemann integrals of finite polynomials after cancellation of the factor ; no singularity at zero occurs.
Identify each cell index with its binary digits, most significant first; the uniform distribution of the bits is the uniform distribution of the equal-volume cells. Regard as a real function on this finite Boolean cube. For , let flip the th binary digit of coordinate on : in every prefix interval of length translate its lower half up by and its upper half down by . Define it arbitrarily at coordinate one. This is a finite piecewise translation preserving elementary integrals, and it pairs the level- cells with that digit flipped. Let . The bit derivative of on a cell is the cell average of . For such an average , the finite triangle inequality gives , so for . Multiplying by and summing cells yields , the hypothesis of step 3.1.
Write . The product noise operator gives , so step 2.1 and the norm hypothesis in step 3.1 imply . For put . Its contribution to the integral in step 3.1 is at most The middle inequality substitutes and uses . The last integral is at most one, proving the last inequality when , and at most , proving it when . At the norm hypothesis gives . Summing establishes the variance estimate claimed in step 3.1.
Fix the coordinates other than . The fiber indicator is an increasing zero-one function of one real variable, hence a threshold indicator except possibly at its threshold. If the endpoint values agree it is constant everywhere. Otherwise flipping the th digit can change its value only in the single prefix interval of length containing the threshold. If the threshold is a prefix endpoint, disagreement at that endpoint has length zero; other intervals are constant. Thus the disagreement length is at most . All these sections and disagreement sets are finite-box sets. Finite-sum iterated integration from step 1.1 gives , and consequently and .
If , steps 4.1–5.1 make every bit derivative of every zero, so every is constant, and step 2.2 gives . If , apply the variance bound of step 4.2 to , using steps 4.1–5.1. Each nonzero denominator is at least , giving . Taking the limit with the explicit error in step 2.2 proves the first stated inequality.
If , step 6.1 gives , which is the required lower bound on . If , use and to get . The elementary bound for follows by differentiating : its maximum is . The case was settled in step 6.1. This proves the stated bound for every integer .
Remarks
The finite-box hypothesis permits every cube integral to be evaluated by finite endpoint subdivision. The only limits are explicit real sequences and one-variable Riemann integrals. This does not assert a choice-free construction of general Lebesgue product measure or the stronger null-invariant influence theorem for arbitrary measurable sets.
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.