How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Independent connected-set envelopes and a greedy lattice-animal bound
Statement
Let be a given probability space. For each , let be a measurable random finite nearest-neighbor-connected vertex set containing , with the discrete sigma-algebra on the countable collection of such sets. Assume the sets are independent and identically distributed and that for every real . A lattice animal is a finite nearest-neighbor-connected vertex set containing . Define the extended measurable envelope Almost surely every is a finite maximum, and there is a deterministic finite constant such that, almost surely, every sufficiently large lattice animal satisfies More generally, for any given independent identically distributed field with finite moments of every positive order, there is a deterministic finite such that almost surely for every sufficiently large lattice animal. The random cutoff may depend on the realization. This result assumes the stated random family on a probability space; it does not construct an infinite product law or require a choice axiom to supply that law.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated probability space and random families, with independence meaning factorization for every finite list of distinct sites.
Nonnegative integrals and their monotonicity are those of Measure space and integral.
Integrals commute with increasing nonnegative limits, so expectations of nonnegative countable sums are the sums of their expectations (Monotone convergence for the measure integral).
Proof
Every supremum defining is measurable because the roots are countable and each has countably many possible finite values. Translation of the common set law and [F2] give . This tail tends to zero: for example it is at most . The union bound therefore shows , hence almost surely. At least contains , and every size is a positive integer, so a finite supremum is attained. Taking the countable union of the null exceptional events proves this simultaneously for all . No independence of the is asserted.
We first prove the assertion for the independent field . Suppose sites are independently marked with probability . If an animal of size at most contains distinct marked sites, a depth-first traversal of a spanning tree of that animal, rooted at , visits them in some order using at most steps. The successive displacement vectors , starting at , have total length at most . There are at most such ordered lists for : choose signs of their two coordinates and distribute at most units among nonnegative coordinate magnitudes. Repeated sites and zero coordinates only cause overcounting. For a list of distinct visited sites, all its sites are marked with probability . Thus . This counts marked-site lists rather than all animals and is uniform over all their shapes.
Put , and fix . Choose a deterministic such that , and a fixed . For set . If the corresponding forbidden event is empty; otherwise step 1.2 bounds its probability by . The union over these values of is summable along dyadic . For a moment order , the elementary inequality and the fact that every size-at-most- animal lies in give , also summable in .
If events have summable probabilities, then ; countable additivity implies that only finitely many occur almost surely. Apply this elementary argument to the failures in step 2.1. Almost surely, for every sufficiently large dyadic , all weights in are at most , and every size-at-most- animal has fewer than sites with at each relevant level. The pointwise layer bound then gives, for every animal with , . Levels above contribute zero; the error comes from the additive in . The constants are deterministic.
A fixed moment order gives , so the series in step 3.1 converges. Its value is deterministic, and the error tends to zero. Choose larger than . Every sufficiently large animal belongs to one of the dyadic size ranges in step 3.1. Thus almost surely its average -weight is at most this same , proving the general independent-field assertion.
Apply step 4.1 to , which is an independent identically distributed field with all moments. Work on the probability-one event where its large-animal bound holds and all are finite. Let be any sufficiently large animal, , , and . For each of the finitely many with , choose a root attaining its maximum; to avoid even a selection convention take the first such root in a fixed enumeration of . Let be the distinct chosen roots, , , and . Low-weight sites contribute at most , and at most sites can be assigned to a given . Hence . Since for chosen roots, .
The set is a finite connected animal containing every root in , because every chosen set meets and is connected. Its size is at least and at most . Therefore the same large-animal bound gives . If , this would imply while step 5.1 gives , a contradiction. Thus and . Taking the deterministic constant proves the envelope assertion uniformly over every sufficiently large animal. Only the given probability laws and countable additivity were used, without constructing any new infinite family.