Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Planar FK duality with the free exterior-face convention

Statement

Let G=(V,E) be a finite connected plane graph with a fixed embedding and ∣V∣≥1. Use the free partition on all primal vertices, B=V. Its plane dual multigraph G∗ has one vertex for each face, including the unbounded face, and one dual edge e∗ crossing each primal edge e; use the identity partition on the dual face-vertices. The unbounded face is one dual vertex, so this convention retains the exterior-face connection in the dual. For a primal open set A⊆E, let A∗:={e∗:e∈E∖A}, so a dual edge is open exactly when its crossing primal edge is closed. For q≥1 and p∈(0,1) define p∗∈(0,1) by

p∗1−p∗=q1−pp.

Then complementing the primal edges sends the finite FK law ϕG,p,qfree to the dual FK law ϕG∗,p∗,qfree: the random dual edge set A∗ has exactly that distribution. The unnormalized weight ratio is the configuration-independent factor q∣V∣−1((1−p)/p∗)∣E∣; the exponent ∣V∣−1 includes the exterior-face contribution under this identity-partition convention.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite connected plane graph with its fixed embedding, its dual multigraph including the unbounded face, A⊆E, q≥1, and p∈(0,1).

[F1]

The finite FK weight is p∣A∣(1−p)∣E∖A∣qk(A); components count isolated vertices (Finite FK random-cluster weights for real q and boundary partitions).

[F3]

For a plane graph with c components, including isolated vertices, ∣V∣−∣E∣+∣F∣=1+c (For a plane graph with c components, ∣V∣−∣E∣+∣F∣=1+c, including the null graph).

[F4]

A cycle edge has two distinct incident faces and a bridge has one face on both local sides (Face frontiers are unions of whole edges; a cycle edge borders two faces and a bridge borders one).

Proof

1.1F2F3F4algebrainduction

For the spanning subgraph (V,A), write FA for its faces. Starting with A=E, the dual open set is empty, so its components are the individual faces of G. Delete primal edges one at a time. If a deleted edge is a bridge of the current subgraph, its component count increases by one while its edge count decreases by one; [F3] therefore leaves the face count unchanged. By [F4] its two local sides lie in one current face, hence in one current dual component by induction, so adding its dual edge does not change the dual component count (the edge may be a loop in the original dual or may join vertices already connected by previously opened dual edges). If it is not a bridge, its component count is unchanged while its edge count decreases by one; [F3] therefore lowers the face count by one. By [F4], the edge has two distinct incident current faces, hence two distinct current dual components by induction; opening its dual edge merges exactly those components. Induction over the finitely many deleted edges proves that dual components correspond to faces of the current primal subgraph; in particular kG∗(A∗)=∣FA∣.

2.1F3step 1.1algebra

Apply [F3] to (V,A), whose number of components is kG(A). It gives ∣V∣−∣A∣+∣FA∣=1+kG(A). Substituting step 1.1 and rearranging yields kG(A)=kG∗(A∗)+∣V∣−∣A∣−1.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra

Let a=∣A∣ and m=∣E∣. By step 2.1, the ratio of primal and dual unnormalized weights is pa(1−p)m−aqkG(A)(p∗)m−a(1−p∗)aqkG∗(A∗)=q∣V∣−1(pq(1−p∗))a(1−pp∗)m−a. The defining relation for p∗ gives p/[q(1−p∗)]=(1−p)/p∗, so this ratio is q∣V∣−1((1−p)/p∗)m, independent of A.

4.1F1F2step 3.1algebra∎

Since A↦A∗ is a bijection from primal edge subsets to dual edge subsets, normalizing the proportional weights in step 3.1 proves the asserted equality of probability laws. The factor q∣V∣−1 is the contribution of the unique exterior face under this free dual convention; the identity is not a criticality argument.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources