Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uniqueness of the outgoing exterior scalar Helmholtz solution with Dirichlet data

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the modal DtN/trace suppliers, covering the Countable Choice used by the local UCP supplier. Let O⊂R3 be a bounded open set with C∞ boundary (Bounded C^k domains and boundary charts) whose exterior D=R3∖O‾ is connected, let k>0, and let R>0 with O‾⊂BR(0). Suppose u is C∞ on D‾, solves (Δ+k2)u=0 on D with the Euclidean Laplacian Δ (The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field), vanishes on ∂O, and is outgoing in the class of Outgoing spherical trace and Dirichlet-to-Neumann map: its trace f=u∣SR lies in H1/2(SR) and its normal derivative on SR is TRf in the weak trace sense of that lemma. Then u=0 on D. No decay rate, asymptotic expansion or pointwise Sommerfeld formula beyond the stated outgoing class is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice); a bounded C∞ obstacle O with connected exterior D; k>0; R>0 with O‾⊂BR(0); and a C∞(D‾) solution u of (Δ+k2)u=0 on D, vanishing on ∂O, outgoing in the modal class of the sphere DtN lemma, with trace f=u∣SR∈H1/2(SR) and normal derivative TRf.

[L1]

First Green identity on a bounded C1 domain: for real w∈C2(Ω‾) and v∈C1(Ω‾), ∫Ω(vΔw+∇w⋅∇v) dx=∫∂Ωv ∂νw dS (First Green identity).

[L2]

The Laplacian is Δf=div⁡∇f=∑i∂i∂if (The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field).

[L3]

Bounded Ck domains have the local graph property, so D∩BR(0) is a bounded domain whose boundary is the disjoint union of the smooth pieces ∂O and SR (Bounded C^k domains and boundary charts).

[L4]

Sphere DtN lemma: for k,R>0 the map TRf=∑l,mtlflmYlmR is bounded H1/2(SR)→H−1/2(SR) with Re⁡⟨TRf,f⟩≤0 and Im⁡⟨TRf,f⟩=∑l,m(Im⁡tl)∣flm∣2>0 for f≠0; the function u(rn)=∑l,mflmhl(kr)/hl(kR)R−1Ylm(n), r≥R, is the unique outgoing finite-local-energy exterior solution with trace f on SR and normal derivative TRf in the weak trace sense (Outgoing spherical trace and Dirichlet-to-Neumann map).

[L5]

Bounded-potential unique continuation: for nonempty open connected Ω⊆R3, V∈Lloc∞(Ω) and ψ∈Hloc2(Ω) with Δψ=Vψ distributionally, vanishing of ψ on a nonempty open subset of Ω forces ψ=0 on Ω (Weak unique continuation for bounded potentials in three dimensions).

Choice accounting. The Axiom of Choice is assumed in the Statement and is carried by the DtN/trace supplier [L4]; the local unique-continuation supplier [L5] carries Countable Choice, which AC supplies. The Green-identity, positivity and propagation steps below introduce no further choice.

Proof

technique · direct

Given: The data and solution of the Given paragraph above.

1.1L1L2L3

Green's identity on the truncated exterior and vanishing of the imaginary boundary pairing. The truncated region A:=D∩BR(0) is a bounded open set whose boundary is the disjoint union of ∂O and SR, with the outward normal of A equal to the outer normal of SR and to the inward normal of ∂O [L3]. Write u=a+ib with real smooth a,b. Applying [L1] to (w,v)=(a,a) and (b,b) and adding gives ∫A(∣∇u∣2−k2∣u∣2) dx=∫∂ARe⁡(u‾ ∂νu) dS, because Δa=−k2a and Δb=−k2b. For the imaginary part, apply [L1] to (w,v)=(b,a) and (a,b) and subtract: the volume integrand is aΔb−bΔa+∇b⋅∇a−∇a⋅∇b=0, and the boundary integrand is a∂νb−b∂νa=Im⁡(u‾ ∂νu). Thus the FULL complex identity is ∫A(∣∇u∣2−k2∣u∣2) dx=∫∂Au‾ ∂νu dS. The inner boundary contributes zero because u=0 on ∂O, so ∫SRIm⁡(u‾ ∂νu) dS=0. Since ∂νu=TRf on SR in the weak trace sense of [L4] and f=u∣SR, the last identity is the vanishing of the imaginary part of the dual pairing, Im⁡⟨TRf,f⟩=0.

2.1L4step 1.1

The boundary trace vanishes. By [L4] the imaginary pairing of the DtN operator is Im⁡⟨TRf,f⟩=∑l,m(Im⁡tl)∣flm∣2 with every coefficient Im⁡tl>0. Since the left side is zero by step 1.1 and every term of the sum is nonnegative, every coefficient flm vanishes, so f=0; consequently also TRf=0 and, by the trace identity of [L4], ∥f∥H1/2(SR)=0.

3.1L4step 2.1

Vanishing on the exterior of the large sphere. Restricted to {r>R}, the field u is an outgoing finite-local-energy solution of the Helmholtz equation with trace f=0 on SR and normal derivative TRf=0: u is C∞ on the closed region {r≥R}, hence in every H1({R<∣x∣<R1}), and its trace and weak normal derivative on SR are the ones named in the statement. By the uniqueness clause of [L4] there is exactly one such solution, namely the outgoing series with coefficients flm=0; hence u=0 on {r>R}. The set D∩{r>R} is a nonempty open subset of D because O is bounded, so u vanishes on the nonempty open set D∩{r>R}.

4.1L5step 3.1∎

Unique continuation on D. The real and imaginary parts of u are C∞ on D‾, hence in Hloc2(D), and satisfy Δw=−k2w on D because Δu=−k2u; the coefficient V≡−k2 lies in Lloc∞(D) and D is nonempty, open and connected. By step 3.1 each of them vanishes on the nonempty open subset D∩{r>R}, so [L5] applied to w=Re⁡u and w=Im⁡u on Ω=D gives Re⁡u=Im⁡u=0 on D, that is, u=0 on D, as asserted.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources