Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The two-equation interface system at normal incidence

Statement

Let εj,μj>0 be real for j=1,2, put Zj:=μj/εj for the nonnegative square root of Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}, and let Ei,Er,Et∈C with Ei≠0 satisfy the two linear equations

Ei+Er=Et,Ei−ErZ1=EtZ2.

Then

ErEi=Z2−Z1Z2+Z1,EtEi=2Z2Z1+Z2,

and the real numbers R:=∣Er/Ei∣2 and T:=(Z1/Z2)∣Et/Ei∣2 satisfy

R+T=1.

The two displayed equations are assumptions, not derived from any wave or field model; the ratio definitions of R and T are algebraic, and no electromagnetic validity is asserted. Oblique incidence, complex impedance and anisotropic media require further systems and branch conventions and are outside this statement.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Real numbers εj,μj>0 for j=1,2, the square roots Zj=μj/εj, and complex numbers Ei,Er,Et with Ei≠0 satisfying Ei+Er=Et and (Ei−Er)/Z1=Et/Z2.

[L1]

Square roots and positivity: for real x≥0 there is a unique s≥0 with s2=x, written x, and x>0 implies x>0; also x2=x for x≥0 (Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}). Order and field arithmetic in R are those of Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property): sums and products of positive reals are positive, a positive real is nonzero, and R⊆C under the embedding of The complex numbers as R[x]/(x2+1), with the real embedding and imaginary unit i, on which the field operations of C restrict to those of R (C=R[x]/(x2+1) is a field, every element is uniquely a+bi, and every nonzero element has inverse (a−bi)/(a2+b2)).

[L2]

For a real r, the coordinate definition ∣r+0i∣=r2 and [L1] give ∣r∣2=r2 (Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus). This is the only modulus property needed below.

Proof

technique · direct; solve the two linear equations by substitution, then substitute the resulting ratios into the algebraic expressions defining $R$ and $T$
1.1givenL1algebra

Positivity and invertibility. Since μj>0 and εj>0, the quotients μj/εj are positive by [L1], so Zj=μj/εj>0 for j=1,2; in particular Z1,Z2≠0 and Z1+Z2>0, so Z1+Z2, Z1Z2 and Ei are invertible complex numbers.

2.1step 1.1L1algebra

Solving the system. Substituting the first equation Et=Ei+Er into the second gives Ei−ErZ1=Ei+ErZ2; multiplying by the nonzero number Z1Z2 and collecting terms yields Z2Ei−Z2Er=Z1Ei+Z1Er, that is, Er(Z1+Z2)=Ei(Z2−Z1). Dividing by the nonzero numbers Ei and Z1+Z2 gives ErEi=Z2−Z1Z1+Z2, and then EtEi=1+ErEi=Z1+Z2+Z2−Z1Z1+Z2=2Z2Z1+Z2 by the field arithmetic of [L1]. Both ratios are real numbers, since all Zj are real.

3.1step 2.1L1L2algebra∎

The balance R+T=1. Because the ratios of step 2.1 are real, [L2] gives ∣Er/Ei∣2=(Z2−Z1Z1+Z2)2 and ∣Et/Ei∣2=(2Z2Z1+Z2)2, so R=(Z2−Z1)2(Z1+Z2)2 and T=Z1Z2⋅4Z22(Z1+Z2)2=4Z1Z2(Z1+Z2)2, and therefore R+T=(Z2−Z1)2+4Z1Z2(Z1+Z2)2=Z22−2Z1Z2+Z12+4Z1Z2(Z1+Z2)2=(Z1+Z2)2(Z1+Z2)2=1 by the expansion (Z1+Z2)2=Z12+2Z1Z2+Z22 and the invertibility of Z1+Z2 from step 1.1.

Remarks

  • In the period-averaged reading of the amplitudes as time-harmonic complex phasors, Period averages of products of real parts of complex exponentials with a=d=A gives 1T0∫0T0Re⁡(Ae−iωt)2 dt=12∣A∣2 for ω>0 and T0=2π/ω, so ∣Er/Ei∣2 is the ratio of the mean squares of the real reflected and incident fields and T differs from the corresponding transmitted mean-square ratio by the real factor Z1/Z2; the identity R+T=1 itself is the algebraic consequence proved above and does not rest on any field model.
  • Neither the system nor the conclusion involves AC or any choice principle; it is finite algebra in R and C. The equations are satisfied by Et=Ei, Er=0 exactly when Z1=Z2, in which case R=0, T=1.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources