Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Closed two-forms agreeing on a Cauchy slice differ by an exact form

Statement

Assume ACω and Dependent Choice. Let (M,g,N) be a smooth time-oriented globally hyperbolic Lorentzian four-manifold, and let i:Σ↪M be a smooth spacelike Cauchy embedding. If F,Fˉ∈Ω2(M) are smooth closed two-forms with i∗F=i∗Fˉ, then F−Fˉ is exact: there is a smooth α∈Ω1(M) such that dα=F−Fˉ.

Here a closed form has zero exterior derivative, and exactness means being the exterior derivative of a globally defined smooth form, as in De rham cohomology.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The globally hyperbolic Lorentzian manifold, Cauchy embedding, two closed forms, and the two stated choice principles.

[F1]

Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model and Smooth Cauchy temporal splitting: a global temporal function with Cauchy levels and an orthogonal complete flow: the spacetime is smooth and time-oriented; under Countable Choice and Dependent Choice it has a smooth temporal function T and a complete future-directed timelike flow Φt with T(Φt(p))=T(p)+t. The published temporal-splitting carrier has verification precheck pending; this proof uses its exact stated flow interface conditionally and does not certify that supplier.

[F2]

Spacelike hypersurfaces, acausal sets, Cauchy sets, domains of dependence and Cauchy horizons: a Cauchy embedding meets every inextendible causal curve at exactly one parameter value, and the induced metric on its spacelike image is positive definite.

[F3]

Lorentzian exterior calculus and Hodge star: the exterior derivative has the coordinate formula dω=(k+1)∂[a0ωa1…ak] on k-forms, and d2=0.

[F4]

De rham cohomology: a smooth form is exact precisely when it is dα for a globally defined smooth form of one lower degree.

[L1]

The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds: a smooth map with invertible differential at a point is a diffeomorphism on sufficiently small neighborhoods of that point.

Proof

Given: The data in the Statement.

1.1givenA1F1F2L1algebraconstruct

Let X and Φt be the complete timelike field and its flow from [F1], and define Ψ:R×Σ→M by Ψ(t,x)=Φt(i(x)). Since T(Φt(p))=T(p)+t, each orbit has no endpoint at either infinite end and is an inextendible timelike curve. Thus [F2] makes its intersection with i(Σ) unique. Hence Ψ is surjective and injective: if two images agree, their points lie on the same orbit, their slice intersections agree, and the flow times agree because the temporal function increases at unit rate along X. The flow is smooth, so Ψ is smooth. If dΨ(t,x)(a∂t+V)=0, applying dΦ−t gives aXi(x)+dix(V)=0. The first vector is timelike when a≠0, while the second is tangent to a spacelike hypersurface; therefore a=0 and V=0. Thus dΨ is an isomorphism, and [L1] shows that Ψ is a local diffeomorphism. Its bijectivity makes it a global diffeomorphism, with Ψ(0,x)=i(x).

2.1step 1.1F3algebraconstruct

Pull back G:=F−Fˉ to the product and write its unique time/spatial decomposition as G~:=Ψ∗G=dt∧ηt+βt, where ηt is a smooth family of spatial one-forms and βt a smooth family of spatial two-forms on Σ. Pullback commutes with d: in local coordinates the first-derivative terms in d(Ψ∗G) are the pullback of dG, while the second derivatives of Ψ cancel in pairs because mixed partials commute and G is antisymmetric. Since dG=0 by hypothesis and [F3], the product-coordinate formula for dG~ gives ∂tβt=dΣηt. The slice equality implies β0=0. Define the spatial one-form α~t:=∫0tηs ds and give α~ zero dt component. The integral of a smooth parameter family is smooth, and direct differentiation gives dα~=dt∧ηt+dΣα~t=dt∧ηt+∫0tdΣηs ds=dt∧ηt+βt=G~.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F4algebra∎

Set α:=(Ψ−1)∗α~. The same coordinate pullback identity gives dα=G=F−Fˉ. By [F4], this is exact on the whole spacetime, not merely on coordinate neighborhoods.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources