Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Relative tangent-groupoid heat-trace limit at simple fixed points

Statement

Assume countable choice. Let T=(R/Z)r, r≥0, be a compact torus acting smoothly by isometries on a compact Riemannian manifold M without boundary. Let E0,…,EN be finite-rank Hermitian bundles and, for 0≤j<N, let dj:C∞(M,Ej)→C∞(M,Ej+1) be first-order differential maps with dj+1dj=0. Assume the principal-symbol sequence is exact for every nonzero real cotangent vector. Suppose a jointly smooth unitary bundle action has fiber maps ρtj(x):Exj→Et⋅xj satisfy ρej(x)=IExj and ρstj(x)=ρsj(t⋅x)∘ρtj(x); on sections set (Utjs)(y)=ρtj(t−1⋅y)(s(t−1⋅y)) and require Utj+1dj=djUtj. Put d−1=dN=0, Eev=⨁j evenEj, Eodd=⨁j oddEj, d=⨁jdj, and Δ=(d+d∗)2, where d∗ is the formal adjoint for the chosen metrics and Riemannian volume. For the nonnegative selfadjoint Hodge realization on L2, assume that Δ has discrete spectrum, smooth eigensections, a trace-class heat operator e−tΔ with smooth kernel for every t>0, finite-dimensional cohomology, and a harmonic representative for each cohomology class. For g∈T, let Mg={x∈M:g⋅x=x}, and suppose each x∈Mg is simple, meaning I−dgx:TxM→TxM is invertible. Then

lim⁡t↓0Str⁡(Uge−tΔ)=∑x∈Mg∑j=0N(−1)jtr⁡(ρgj∣Exj)∣det⁡R(I−dgx)∣.

Here Str⁡ is the trace on Eev minus the trace on Eodd. The simplicity condition makes Mg a finite set; the determinant is the normal Jacobian at that isolated fixed point.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The manifold, compact torus action, equivariant first-order elliptic complex and Hodge heat data in the Statement, and an element g∈T with simple fixed points.

[F1]

The section action is Ugs(x)=ρg(g−1⋅x)(s(g−1⋅x)), and the differentials commute with it. Equivariant elliptic-complex index and character

[L1]

Positive matrix-symbol second-order operators with the stated spectral heat data have the locally uniform rescaled tangent kernel, normalized tangent integral ∫kx(w) dw=I, and, for every L>n, the estimate ∥Kt(y,z)∥≤CLt−n/2(1+d(y,z)/t)−L. The proof constructs a frozen-coefficient kernel and its convergent Volterra correction; no scalar-principal-symbol assumption is used. Rescaled heat kernels for positive matrix principal symbols

[F2]

Dominated convergence holds under an integrable majorant. Dominated convergence

[A1]

Countable choice is inherited from the Fourier/partition interfaces in [L1]. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

Proof

technique · Tangent heat-kernel rescaling with a proved polynomial majorant

Given: The Hodge heat operator and equivariant action in the Statement.

1.1givenF1algebra

At a simple fixed point x, the inverse function theorem makes x isolated in Mg; since Mg is closed in compact M, it is finite. Choose disjoint sufficiently small normal neighborhoods of these points. In normal coordinates the isometry satisfies g−1exp⁡x(t v)=exp⁡x(t dgx−1v). For the trace-integral identity, factor Uge−tΔ=(Uge−tΔ/2)e−tΔ/2. Both factors have smooth kernels on compact M and finite Hilbert–Schmidt norm. Expansion in an orthonormal basis and Cauchy–Schwarz make the integrated product absolutely summable, giving its trace as the integral of the composed diagonal kernel. The section-action convention in [F1] therefore identifies the trace integrand with ∑j(−1)jtr⁡(ρgj(g−1y)Ktj(g−1y,y)).

1.2givenL1A1algebra

Use the positive-frequency convention σ1(dj)(x,ξ)=∑∣α∣=1aj,α(x)(iξ)α. Integration by parts gives σ1(dj∗)=σ1(dj)∗ in this convention. Put Bj=σ1(dj)(x,ξ), with B−1=BN=0. The principal symbol on Ej of Δ is pj=Bj∗Bj+Bj−1Bj−1∗. If its quadratic form vanishes on v, then Bjv=0 and Bj−1∗v=0; exactness gives v∈im⁡Bj−1 and also orthogonality to that image, hence v=0. Compactness of the unit cotangent sphere bundle gives pj(x,ξ)≥c∣ξ∣2I uniformly. Thus [L1] applies to Δ, using exactly the given spectral heat data. Its principal symbol may be matrix-valued.

2.1givenL1F2step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Write n=dim⁡M and Jx for the normal-coordinate volume density. For y=exp⁡x(t v) in the chosen neighborhood, [L1] and step 1.1 imply that tn/2Jx(t v)∑j(−1)jtr⁡(ρgj(g−1y)Ktj(g−1y,y)) tends pointwise to ∑j(−1)jtr⁡(ρgj∣Exj kxj(dgx−1v−v)). Simplicity makes dgx−1−I invertible. Local distance comparison in the normal chart therefore gives d(g−1y,y)≥cxt ∣v∣. Choose L>n; bounded density, unitary ρg and [L1] bound the extended-by-zero rescaled density by C(1+cx∣v∣)−L, integrable on TxM. Outside these neighborhoods compactness gives d(g−1y,y)≥δ>0, so [L1] bounds the full complementary trace integral by Ct(L−n)/2→0. By [F2], the heat-supertrace limit is consequently the sum of these tangent integrals. No uniform-integral-bound-to-convergence implication is used.

3.1L1step 2.1algebra∎

Since dgx is orthogonal, ∣det⁡(dgx−1−I)∣=∣det⁡(I−dgx)∣. The change of variables w=(dgx−1−I)v therefore contributes ∣det⁡R(I−dgx)∣−1. By [L1], the constant-coefficient tangent heat kernel has integral IEx∙. Its graded fiber trace after composition with ρg is ∑j(−1)jtr⁡(ρg∣Exj). For n=0, the tangent integral and determinant are both the empty-dimensional values 1, so the same expression holds. Summing the finitely many contributions proves the stated limit.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources