How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every Zariski-closed subset has a unique radical defining ideal
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be a commutative ring and let be Zariski-closed. Then is a radical ideal, , and if for an ideal , then . In particular, has a unique radical defining ideal.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , a Zariski-closed subset , and the Axiom of Choice.
For every ideal , its radical is the intersection of the prime ideals containing (The radical of an ideal is the intersection of the prime ideals containing it).
Two vanishing sets are equal exactly when the radicals of their defining ideals are equal (Vanishing sets detect radicals).
Because is Zariski-closed, there exists an ideal with .
Proof
Choose with as in [A1]. Then by [L1]. In particular, is radical.
Since step 1.1 gives , fact [L2] yields .
If also for an ideal , then , so [L2] gives . Thus any radical ideal defining equals .
Therefore every Zariski-closed subset has the unique radical defining ideal .