How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Vanishing sets detect radicals
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be a commutative ring and let be ideals. Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , ideals , and the Axiom of Choice.
The radical of an ideal is the intersection of the prime ideals containing it (The radical of an ideal is the intersection of the prime ideals containing it).
Radical is an idempotent ideal-valued operation (The radical of an ideal is an ideal).
Proof
If , then the two ideals are contained in exactly the same prime ideals. Applying [L1] to both ideals shows that and are intersections over the same family of prime ideals, hence .
Conversely, suppose . If , then contains , so [L1] gives . Therefore , hence by [L2], and . The same argument with and reversed shows .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove that vanishing sets agree exactly when radicals agree.