Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Continuous residuals localize on C1 domains

Statement

Let Ω⊆R3 be open and let h:Ω→R be continuous. A bounded C1 subdomain of Ω means a nonempty bounded open set V with V‾⊂Ω whose boundary is locally, after rigid coordinate changes, a C1 graph with V on one side. If ∫Vh dx=0 for every bounded C1 subdomain V⋐Ω, then h=0 throughout Ω. If instead ∫Vh dx≥0 for every such V, then h≥0 throughout Ω. These are pointwise conclusions for continuous integrands; no assertion is made for merely integrable or distributional residuals.

Statement references

C1 material regions have compatible Jordan volume integrals

Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm

Jiří Lebl, Basic Analysis II, §10.5 Jordan measurable sets — Definition10.5.4 and Propositions10.5.5–10.5.6, especially integral monotonicity: ingredients in the local continuity-and-positive-ball localization proof. Lebl is not asserted to state this complete C1-subdomain localization lemma verbatim.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The open region Ω, the continuous scalar field h, and the integral conditions stated in the lemma.

[F1]

C1 material regions have compatible Jordan volume integrals: every bounded open region with locally C1 graph boundary is Jordan measurable, and its Riemann integral is the zero-extension integral.

[F3]

A bounded set is Jordan measurable iff its indicator is Riemann integrable, and the integral is its Jordan content: the indicator of a Jordan set is Riemann integrable and its integral equals its content; a nondegenerate cube has positive content equal to its volume.

Proof

Given: [F1]–[F3], an open Ω, and continuous h.

1.1F1F2F3given

If h(a0)>0 at some a0∈Ω, continuity gives a closed ball Br(a0)‾⊂Ω and a constant c>0 with h≥c on that ball. Let V=Br(a0). At each sphere point p, choose rigid coordinates centered at a0 with the third axis parallel to p−a0. Near p, the sphere is the graph z=r2−∣y∣2 over a disk about y=0 (reversing the third axis if needed), and V lies on one side; hence V is a bounded C1 subdomain. Choose a nondegenerate closed cube Q⊂V. By [F1] the integral over V exists; monotonicity [F2] and the cube-content formula [F3] give ∫V1 dx≥∫Q1 dx=vol⁡(Q)>0, hence ∫Vh dx≥c∫V1 dx>0. This contradicts the zero-integral hypothesis. If instead h(a0)<0, the same ball construction gives h≤−c on V and ∫Vh dx≤−c∫V1 dx<0, contradicting either stated integral hypothesis.

2.1givenstep 1.1∎

The zero-integral case therefore has neither positive nor negative values, so h=0 throughout Ω. The nonnegative-integral case has no negative values, so h≥0 throughout Ω. These are the two asserted conclusions.

Source notes

These are source ingredients adapted in the local proof, rather than an attribution of this complete lemma verbatim.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources