How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Continuous residuals localize on C1 domains
Statement
Let be open and let be continuous. A bounded subdomain of means a nonempty bounded open set with whose boundary is locally, after rigid coordinate changes, a graph with on one side. If for every bounded subdomain , then throughout . If instead for every such , then throughout . These are pointwise conclusions for continuous integrands; no assertion is made for merely integrable or distributional residuals.
Statement references
C1 material regions have compatible Jordan volume integrals
Jiří Lebl, Basic Analysis II, §10.5 Jordan measurable sets — Definition10.5.4 and Propositions10.5.5–10.5.6, especially integral monotonicity: ingredients in the local continuity-and-positive-ball localization proof. Lebl is not asserted to state this complete C1-subdomain localization lemma verbatim.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The open region , the continuous scalar field , and the integral conditions stated in the lemma.
C1 material regions have compatible Jordan volume integrals: every bounded open region with locally graph boundary is Jordan measurable, and its Riemann integral is the zero-extension integral.
Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in : the Riemann integral is monotone on a rectangle.
A bounded set is Jordan measurable iff its indicator is Riemann integrable, and the integral is its Jordan content: the indicator of a Jordan set is Riemann integrable and its integral equals its content; a nondegenerate cube has positive content equal to its volume.
Proof
Given: [F1]–[F3], an open , and continuous .
If at some , continuity gives a closed ball and a constant with on that ball. Let . At each sphere point , choose rigid coordinates centered at with the third axis parallel to . Near , the sphere is the graph over a disk about (reversing the third axis if needed), and lies on one side; hence is a bounded subdomain. Choose a nondegenerate closed cube . By [F1] the integral over exists; monotonicity [F2] and the cube-content formula [F3] give , hence . This contradicts the zero-integral hypothesis. If instead , the same ball construction gives on and , contradicting either stated integral hypothesis.
The zero-integral case therefore has neither positive nor negative values, so throughout . The nonnegative-integral case has no negative values, so throughout . These are the two asserted conclusions.
Source notes
These are source ingredients adapted in the local proof, rather than an attribution of this complete lemma verbatim.