Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth transport, Jacobian and advected reference density

Statement

Let I⊆R be an open interval containing 0, let B⊆R3 be a bounded open region, let U be an open neighborhood of B‾, and let χ∈C2(I×U,R3) be a family of orientation-preserving diffeomorphisms χt:U→χt(U) with J(t,a):=det⁡Daχ(t,a)>0. Here Cr means that all coordinate partial derivatives through total order r exist and are continuous; a diffeomorphism is a bijection with an inverse of the stated regularity. Write A(t,x)=χt−1(x), u(t,x)=∂tχ(t,A(t,x)), F=Daχ, L=Dxu, and θ=tr⁡L=∑i=13∂xiui. Here Daχ and Dxu are matrices of coordinate partial derivatives. The joint inverse A has domain Ω={(t,x):t∈I, x∈χt(U)}.

A compact Jordan set K⊂R3 means a compact set whose boundary, for every ε>0, is coverable by finitely many axis-parallel boxes with total volume less than ε, where a box's volume is the product of its side lengths. Integrals over such sets are Riemann integrals, defined by extending the integrand by zero to a containing rectangle. Let K⊂U be any compact Jordan set and let q,ρ∈C1(Ω,R). Then A is jointly C2, and for every a∈U and t∈I,

∂tF(t,a)=L(t,χ(t,a))F(t,a),∂tJ(t,a)=J(t,a)θ(t,χ(t,a)),J(t,a)=J(0,a)exp⁡ ⁣(∫0tθ(s,χ(s,a)) ds).

For every t∈I, change of variables and material transport satisfy

∫χt(K)q(t,x) dx=∫Kq(t,χ(t,a))J(t,a) da,

ddt∫χt(K)q(t,x) dx=∫χt(K)(Dtq(t,x)+q(t,x)θ(t,x)) dx=∫χt(K)(∂tq+∇x ⁣⋅(qu)) dx,

where Dtq=∂tq+u⋅∇xq and ∇x ⁣⋅(qu)=∑i=13∂xi(qui). Define MK(t):=∫χt(K)ρ(t,x) dx. The pointwise continuity equation Dtρ+ρθ=0, equivalently ∂tρ+∇x ⁣⋅(ρu)=0, holds on Ω if and only if MK is constant on I for every compact Jordan K⊂U, and if and only if ρ(t,χ(t,a))J(t,a)=ρ(0,χ(0,a))J(0,a) for all a∈U and t∈I. This is a mathematical equivalence; it adopts no physical mass-conservation postulate and asserts no weak-field or vacuum extension.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The motion, fields, and compact Jordan set in the statement.

[F1]

The stated motion is jointly C2 with orientation-preserving diffeomorphic slices; u=∂tχ∘A and Dt=∂t+u⋅∇x are the local definitions in this lemma's Statement. Joint inverse regularity is proved in steps 1.1 and 2.1 using [F2]. The notation agrees with Smooth material configurations and Eulerian fields when that definition's regular-body hypotheses apply; no regularity of ∂B is needed here.

[F2]

The Euclidean inverse function theorem: a C1 Euclidean map with invertible derivative at a point has a C1 local inverse with derivative given by the inverse matrix.

[F3]

The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a): for composable totally differentiable Euclidean maps, D(g∘f)=Dg(f)Df.

[F4]

For every fixed finite size at least one, the determinant of a real square matrix is a polynomial in its matrix entries: for every finite matrix size the determinant is given by its Leibniz permutation polynomial; in particular, for a 3×3 matrix M=(mij), det⁡M=∑σ∈S3sgn⁡(σ)∏i=13mσ(i),i, where S3 is the set of permutations of {1,2,3} and sgn⁡(σ) is 1 or −1 according as σ is even or odd.

[F5]

Change of variables for an injective C1 map on a compact Jordan set: an injective C1 Euclidean map with invertible derivative transforms Riemann integrals over compact Jordan sets by the absolute determinant.

[F6]

A continuous real function on a compact Jordan measurable set is Riemann integrable over that set: every continuous real function on a compact Jordan set is Riemann integrable there.

[F7]

The Riemann integral of a bounded function over a bounded Jordan measurable set, The Riemann integral over a Jordan set is independent of the bounding rectangle: the integral over a bounded Jordan set is the zero-extension integral on a containing rectangle, independent of the chosen rectangle.

[F8]

Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm: on a rectangle the Riemann integral is linear, monotone, and satisfies the absolute-value bound.

[F9]

On a convex open set, a uniform bound ∥Df(z)v∥2≤M∥v∥2 implies ∥f(y)−f(x)∥2≤M∥y−x∥2: on a convex open interval, a uniform derivative bound gives the corresponding difference bound for a scalar function.

[F10]

A totally differentiable map with zero derivative on a convex open set is constant: a totally differentiable map with zero derivative on a convex open set is constant there.

[F11]

An injective C1 map with invertible derivative sends compact Jordan sets to compact Jordan sets: an injective C1 map with invertible derivative sends every compact Jordan set K in its domain to a compact Jordan image g(K)

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

Set H(t,a)=(t,χ(t,a)). It is C2 and injective: equality of two images first gives equal times and then equal labels by injectivity of that time slice. Its derivative is block triangular with determinant J(t,a)>0, so [F2] gives local C1 inverses; injectivity makes these local inverses agree on overlaps and yields the joint C1 inverse on Ω.

1.2F5F6F11given

For fixed t, the image χt(K) is compact Jordan by [F11]. The continuous function q(t,⋅) is Riemann integrable there by [F6]. The map χt is injective and C1 with invertible derivative, so applying [F5] and using J(t,a)>0 gives ∫χt(K)q(t,x) dx=∫KG1(t,a) da, where G1(t,a):=q(t,χ(t,a))J(t,a).

2.1F3F4step 1.1algebra

Differentiating H∘H−1=id and using [F3] gives D(H−1)=(DH∘H−1)−1. Since DH and H−1 are C1, their composition is C1. Each entry of its inverse is a cofactor divided by its nonzero determinant; cofactors are determinants of minors and are polynomials by [F4]. Thus D(H−1) is C1, so H−1 is C2 and in particular A is jointly C2.

3.1F1F3step 2.1

Differentiate A(t,χ(t,a))=a in t and in a. The chain rule gives ∂tA+(DxA)u=0 and (DxA)F=I3, hence DxA=F−1. For every C1 scalar field q, it also gives ∂t(q(t,χ(t,a)))=(Dtq)(t,χ(t,a)).

4.1givenF1F3step 3.1algebra

To justify commuting the mixed partials, fix a component g of χ and a reference coordinate ai. For sufficiently small h,k, the rectangular increment g(t+h,a+kei)−g(t,a+kei)−g(t+h,a)+g(t,a) equals both ∫tt+h ⁣∫0k∂ai∂sg(s,a+rei) dr ds and ∫0k ⁣∫tt+h∂s∂aig(s,a+rei) ds dr, by the one-variable fundamental theorem of calculus applied in the two orders. Divide by hk and let h,k→0; continuity of both second partials gives ∂t∂aig=∂ai∂tg. Hence ∂tF=Da∂tχ. Now use ∂tχ=u(t,χ) and [F3] to obtain ∂tF=(Dxu)(t,χ)F=L(t,χ)F.

5.1F4step 4.1algebra

Put C=F−1∂tF. The permutation formula in [F4] is a finite sum with one entry from each column; the product rule therefore differentiates J by replacing one column at a time: ∂tJ=∑j=13det⁡(F1,…,∂tFj,…,F3). Since ∂tF=FC, multilinearity expands ∂tFj=∑iFiCij in the jth term. For i≠j, the resulting determinant has two equal columns and its permutation terms cancel in pairs under the transposition of those columns; only i=j remains. Thus ∂tJ=J∑jCjj=Jtr⁡C. By step 4.1, C=F−1L(t,χ)F, and the finite-sum calculation ∑i(F−1LF)ii=∑j,kLjk∑iFki(F−1)ij=∑jLjj gives tr⁡(F−1LF)=tr⁡L. Hence ∂tJ=Jθ(t,χ).

6.1F6F8F10step 5.1algebra

For fixed a, set h(s)=θ(s,χ(s,a)) and G(t)=∫0th(s) ds. Continuity gives Riemann integrability on each compact subinterval by [F6]. For small nonzero k, the absolute integral estimate [F8] yields ∣(G(t+k)−G(t))/k−h(t)∣≤sup⁡s between t and t+k∣h(s)−h(t)∣, which tends to zero. Thus G′=h. By step 5.1, (Je−G)′=0; [F10] makes this product constant on the interval I, and evaluating at t=0 gives the stated exponential formula.

6.2F1F3step 1.2step 3.1step 5.1algebra

The function G1 from step 1.2 is C1. By the chain and product rules and steps 3.1 and 5.1, ∂tG1(t,a)=(Dtq+qθ)(t,χ(t,a))J(t,a).

7.1F9step 1.2step 6.2algebra

If K=∅, the fixed-domain integral in step 1.2 and its derivative are zero, and step 1.2 identifies the moving-domain integral with it; thus the differentiation assertion holds. Assume K≠∅. Fix t and choose a compact interval T⊂I around it with T×K⊂I×U. For any ε>0 and each a0∈K, continuity of ∂tG1 at (t,a0) supplies a product neighborhood Ta0×Va0 on which ∂tG1 differs from ∂tG1(t,a0) by less than ε/3. A finite subcover of K and the minimum of its finitely many time widths show that ∣∂tG1(s,a)−∂tG1(t,a)∣<2ε/3 uniformly for a∈K when s is sufficiently close to t. Choose an open interval V containing t, contained in int⁡T and in this time neighborhood, and take k≠0 small enough that the segment from t to t+k lies in V. For each fixed a∈K, the C1 function ϕa(s):=G1(s,a)−G1(t,a)−(s−t)∂tG1(t,a) has derivative ϕa′(s)=∂tG1(s,a)−∂tG1(t,a), whose absolute value is less than 2ε/3 throughout V. Applying [F9] to ϕa∣V gives the same uniform bound for the difference-quotient error. Thus the difference quotients converge uniformly on K to ∂tG1(t,⋅).

8.1F6F7F8step 7.1

The integrands G1(t,⋅) and ∂tG1(t,⋅) are continuous on K and hence integrable by [F6]. Use [F7] to represent the integrals as integrals of zero extensions on one fixed nondegenerate containing rectangle. Outside K the extended difference quotients are zero, so [F8]'s absolute-value bound moves the difference quotient through the rectangle integral and bounds its error by the rectangle's volume times the uniform error. The uniform convergence from step 7.1 proves ddt∫KG1(t,a) da=∫K∂tG1(t,a) da.

9.1step 1.2step 6.2step 8.1algebra

Substitute step 6.2 into step 8.1 and use step 1.2 to return to current coordinates. The coordinate product rule gives ∇x ⁣⋅(qu)=u⋅∇xq+qθ, proving both transport identities.

10.1F10step 9.1given

Set R:=Dtρ+ρθ. It is continuous on Ω because u,ρ∈C1 and θ is continuous. Step 9.1 gives MK′(t)=∫χt(K)R(t,x) dx. If R=0, each MK has zero derivative and is constant by [F10] on I.

10.2F1F5F6F8F11step 9.1algebra

Conversely, if every MK is constant, then its derivative is zero. For each fixed t, R(t,⋅) is continuous, and [F11] makes χt(K) compact Jordan; [F6] therefore makes R(t,⋅) Riemann integrable there, so [F5] and step 9.1 give ∫KR(t,χ(t,a))J(t,a) da=0 for every compact Jordan K⊂U. If the continuous integrand were positive at some a0∈U, continuity and J>0 would give a small closed cube C⊂U on which it is at least half its positive value at a0. Monotonicity in [F8] would then give a strictly positive integral over C, since C has positive volume, contradicting the zero integral. If it were negative, apply the same argument to its negative and use linearity in [F8]. Thus R(t,χ(t,a))J(t,a)=0 for every a∈U; since J>0 and χt maps U onto χt(U), R=0 throughout the swept open set.

11.1F1F3F10step 5.1step 10.1step 10.2algebra∎

For fixed a∈U, product and chain rules give ddt[ρ(t,χ(t,a))J(t,a)]=J(t,a)R(t,χ(t,a)). If R=0, [F10] makes this product constant on I, with value ρ(0,χ(0,a))J(0,a). Conversely, that invariance implies its derivative is zero, and J>0 gives R=0. Together with steps 10.1 and 10.2 this proves all equivalences.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources