Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Quantitative shallow and deep bounds for the hyperbolic tangent

Statement

For every real s≥0,

0≤s−tanh⁡s≤s33,0≤1−tanh⁡s≤2e−2s.

Statement references

The linear gravity-wave shallow and deep limits use tanh⁡(kh): Feddersen, Linear Surface Gravity Waves 1, §2.4, PDF pp. 5–6.

The finite-depth surface-gravity dispersion relation and its limiting regimes: Firing, OCN 620, §19.4.

The six hyperbolic functions and their natural domains

Addition formulas, identities, parity, and derivatives of the hyperbolic functions

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real number s≥0.

[F1]

For real x, sinh⁡x=(ex−e−x)/2, cosh⁡x=(ex+e−x)/2, tanh⁡x=sinh⁡x/cosh⁡x, and sech⁡x=1/cosh⁡x; cosh⁡x>0 (The six hyperbolic functions and their natural domains).

[F2]

cosh⁡2x−sinh⁡2x=1, tanh⁡′(x)=sech⁡2x, tanh⁡ is strictly increasing, and tanh⁡(0)=0 (Addition formulas, identities, parity, and derivatives of the hyperbolic functions).

[F3]

If a<b and f is continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b), some c∈(a,b) satisfies f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a) (The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a)).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

Divide cosh⁡2s−sinh⁡2s=1 by cosh⁡2s>0 to get 1−sech⁡2s=tanh⁡2s. Let f(s)=s−tanh⁡s. Then f(0)=0 and f′(s)=tanh⁡2s≥0. If s>0, apply [F3] on [0,s] to obtain f(s)−f(0)=f′(c)s≥0 for some c∈(0,s); at s=0 equality holds. Thus s−tanh⁡s≥0.

2.1givenF2F3step 1.1algebra

Let g(s)=s3/3−f(s). By step 1.1 and monotonicity in [F2], s−tanh⁡s≥0 and s+tanh⁡s≥0 for s≥0. Hence g(0)=0 and g′(s)=s2−tanh⁡2s=(s−tanh⁡s)(s+tanh⁡s)≥0. For s>0, [F3] on [0,s] gives g(s)−g(0)=g′(c)s≥0 for some c∈(0,s); at s=0 equality holds. Therefore s−tanh⁡s≤s3/3.

3.1givenF1F4F5step 1.1algebra∎

The definitions [F1] and reciprocal identity [F5] give 1−tanh⁡s=2e−s/(es+e−s). Multiplying numerator and denominator by es>0 and using [F4] gives 1−tanh⁡s=2/(e2s+1). This is nonnegative, and e2s+1≥e2s>0, so 2/(e2s+1)≤2e−2s. Together with step 1.1 this proves both claimed bounds.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources