Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Each real layer has a ground-model cardinal bound

Statement

In the Feferman–Levy model, for every m<ω there is a surjection ℵm+1V↠Rm. In particular ∣Rm∣≤ℵm+1V. Jech's sharper bookkeeping gives equality; only the displayed upper bound is used below.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A ground model V⊨ZFC+GCH and the layer Rm for one fixed m<ω. Cardinal arithmetic in this proof is performed in V.

[F1]

The real layers of the Feferman–Levy model defines Sm as the set of ω-sequences of coefficients from Bm and Rm as its interpretation.

[F2]

Fixed Boolean values come from initial collapse layers says that Bm is generated by restrictions to the first m collapse layers.

[F3]

The Axiom of Choice records the ground-model Choice used to compare the cardinals of the coding sets; no Choice assertion about N is made.

Proof

technique · direct coding and interpretation of one bounded-support enumeration
1.1F2F3

The set P<m={p↾m:p∈P} has ground cardinal at most ℵmV: its elements are finite functions using ordinals below the finitely many cardinals ℵnV for n<m (and for m=0 it is a singleton). Every regular open generated by P<m is a subset of P<m, so F2 gives ∣Bm∣V≤2ℵmV=ℵm+1V. This deliberately coarse estimate covers m=0 uniformly.

2.1F1F3step 1.1

By F1, a member of Sm is coded by a function ω→Bm. In ground ZFC and GCH, step 1.1 gives ∣Sm∣V≤(2ℵmV)ℵ0=2ℵmV=ℵm+1V. Since the constantly-zero name belongs to Sm, ground Choice supplies a fixed surjection em:ℵm+1V↠Sm.

3.1F1step 2.1

Form the canonical name e˙m∗={⟨⟨ξˇ,x˙⟩∙,1B⟩:ξ<ℵm+1V and x˙=em(ξ)}. Every value name belongs to Sm and is fixed by Hm, so Hm fixes e˙m∗ and all its subnames. Thus it is hereditarily symmetric. Its interpretation is the function ξ↦em(ξ)G, whose range is exactly Rm by F1. Hence N contains the required surjection.

4.1F3step 3.1∎

The ground use of Choice and GCH occurred only in steps 1.1–2.1 to obtain the single coded enumeration em. Step 3.1 puts its interpretation in N without choosing enumerations for a family of arbitrary sets. This proves the asserted internal bound.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources