Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A chart with constant metric components has vanishing metric-selected Christoffel symbols and curvature

Statement

Let (M,g,N) be a time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold (Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model) with metric-selected connection ∇ (Metric compatibility, torsion freedom and the metric-selected connection class, Existence and uniqueness of the metric-selected connection of a nondegenerate metric, and its extension to tensor fields), and let (U,x) be a smooth chart of M in which every metric component gab=g(∂a,∂b) is a constant function on U. Then:

(a) Every Christoffel symbol of ∇ in the chart vanishes identically on U, Γabc=0 (Christoffel symbols of an affine connection).

(b) The curvature tensor of ∇ vanishes identically on U, R=0 (The Riemann curvature operator and the derived Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors, Tensoriality of the curvature, its coordinate formula and its point-normal metric formula).

(c) Every coordinate curve of the chart is a geodesic of ∇; that is, for fixed constants c1,c2,c3 the curve s↦x−1(s,c1,c2,c3) is a geodesic in the affine parameter s (Coordinate geodesic equation).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold with metric-selected connection, and a chart (U,x) with constant metric components.

[L1]

An affine connection on a smooth manifold is determined by its Christoffel symbols in any chart, which are smooth functions with ∇∂b∂c=∑aΓabc∂a; conversely, arbitrary smooth coefficient functions define an affine connection on the chart domain (Affine connection on a smooth manifold, Christoffel symbols of an affine connection).

[L2]

For a nondegenerate metric the metric-selected connection is the unique affine connection that is torsion-free and metric-compatible; in a chart, torsion freedom is equivalent to Γabc=Γacb and metric compatibility to ∂agbc=∑d(Γdabgdc+Γdacgbd) (Existence and uniqueness of the metric-selected connection of a nondegenerate metric, and its extension to tensor fields clause (b), Torsion freedom and metric compatibility in chart components, Metric compatibility, torsion freedom and the metric-selected connection class).

[L3]

In a chart, the curvature components of a connection are Rabcd=∂cΓabd−∂dΓabc+∑e(ΓebdΓace−ΓebcΓade) (Tensoriality of the curvature, its coordinate formula and its point-normal metric formula, The Riemann curvature operator and the derived Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors).

[L4]

A smooth curve whose coordinate path y satisfies y¨k=−∑i,jΓkijy˙iy˙j in the chart is a geodesic of the connection, and conversely (Coordinate geodesic equation, Christoffel symbols of an affine connection).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L2

(The zero-coefficient connection.) On the open submanifold U, consider the coordinate connection ∇c whose Christoffel symbols in (U,x) are all zero; this is an affine connection on U by [L1]. Its coefficients satisfy Γabc=0=Γacb, so it is torsion-free; and the compatibility identity of [L2] holds because both sides vanish: the left side is ∂agbc=0 since the metric components are constant, and the right side is a sum of terms each containing a Christoffel symbol. Hence ∇c is a torsion-free metric-compatible connection for the restricted metric g∣U; by uniqueness in [L2] it equals the metric-selected connection of (U,g∣U), which is the restriction ∇∣U of the metric-selected connection of M (its restriction is torsion-free and metric-compatible on U). Therefore every Christoffel symbol of ∇ in (U,x) vanishes on U, which is (a).

2.1step 1.1L3

(The curvature.) Substituting the vanishing coefficients of step 1.1 into the coordinate formula [L3] makes every term vanish identically on U, so Rabcd=0 on U for all indices; since the curvature is a tensor field, R=0 on U. This is (b).

3.1step 1.1L4∎

(Coordinate curves.) Let y(s)=(s,c1,c2,c3) be the coordinate path of a coordinate curve; then y˙=(1,0,0,0) and y¨=0. The right side of the geodesic equation of [L4] vanishes because every Γkij vanishes by step 1.1, so the equation holds and the coordinate curve is a geodesic in the affine parameter s. This proves (c) and completes the proof.

Remarks

  • Hypothesis. The lemma needs the components to be constant on the whole chart domain. Vanishing of the metric components' first derivatives at a single point does not make the Christoffel symbols vanish identically, so no pointwise version is claimed.
  • Converse. A chart is not required to be an exponential or normal chart; any chart with constant components qualifies. Conversely the conclusion Γ=0 in a chart forces ∂agbc=0 there by [L2], so locally constant components are equivalent to vanishing Christoffel symbols for the metric-selected connection; the components are constant on each connected component of the chart domain.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources