Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The component transformation law of a smooth tensor field

Statement

Let (M,g,N) be a time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold (Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model), let r,s≥0, and let T be a family assigning to each p∈M a type (r,s) tensor at p (Tensor fields of type (r,s) on a Lorentzian four-manifold and their components). Let (U,x) and (V,y) be overlapping smooth charts, and write Ta1⋯arb1⋯bs and T′a1⋯arb1⋯bs for the components of T in the charts x and y. Then for every q∈U∩V,

T′a1⋯arb1⋯bs(y(q))=∑c1,…,cr∑d1,…,ds(∏i=1r∂yai∂xci(x(q)))(∏j=1s∂xdj∂ybj(y(q)))Tc1⋯crd1⋯ds(x(q)),

where ∂ya/∂xc and ∂xd/∂yb are the entries of the total derivatives of y∘x−1 and x∘y−1. Moreover T is a smooth tensor field of type (r,s) if and only if its components are C∞ in the charts of some one smooth atlas of M; in that case the components in every smooth chart are C∞.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold (M,g,N), integers r,s≥0, a family T of type (r,s) tensors, and overlapping smooth charts (U,x), (V,y).

[L1]

The components of T in a chart are the evaluations Ta1⋯arb1⋯bs(q)=Tq(dxa1∣q,…,∂b1∣q,… ), and T is a smooth tensor field of type (r,s) when these are C∞ in the charts of the maximal smooth atlas (Tensor fields of type (r,s) on a Lorentzian four-manifold and their components).

[L2]

The coordinate derivations of one chart expand in those of another by ∂xi∣q=∑j∂(yj∘x−1)∂xi(x(q)) ∂yj∣q (Change-of-coordinate formula for tangent bases).

[L3]

The coordinate differentials of a chart form the dual basis of its coordinate derivations, and every covector expands in a dual basis (Coordinate differentials form the dual cotangent basis, Coordinate derivations form a basis of the tangent space).

[L4]

For a chart (U,x) and q∈U, the coordinate derivation acts on a smooth function by ∂xi∣qf=Di(f∘x−1)(x(q)); in particular ∂xi∣q(yj)=∂yj∂xi(x(q)) (Coordinate derivations are well-defined derivations).

[L5]

Smoothly compatible charts have smooth transition maps in both directions, and the entries of their total derivatives are smooth functions (Smoothly compatible charts and the smoothness of Euclidean transition maps, Cr and smooth maps between smooth manifolds).

[L6]

Matrix inversion preserves Ck regularity on the invertible matrices, so the entries ∂xd∂yb of the inverse Jacobian are C∞ (Matrix inversion preserves Ck regularity where the determinant is nonzero).

[L7]

Finite sums and products of C∞ Euclidean maps are C∞, and composites of C∞ maps are C∞ (Ck Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L2L3L4given

Fix q∈U∩V and write ∂xi:=∂xi∣q, ∂yj:=∂yj∣q, dxi:=dxi∣q, dyj:=dyj∣q. By [L2] applied to the two charts, ∂yb=∑d∂xd∂yb(y(q)) ∂xd. By [L3] and [L4], dya is the dual basis element of ∂ya and its coefficients in the dual basis (dxc) are dya(∂xc)=∂xc(ya)=∂ya∂xc(x(q)); hence dya=∑c∂ya∂xc(x(q)) dxc.

2.1step 1.1L1algebra

Since Tq is multilinear in its r covector and s vector arguments, substituting the expansions of step 1.1 into the definition of the y-components gives the displayed transformation law: each contravariant slot contributes one factor ∂yai∂xci(x(q)) and each covariant slot one factor ∂xdj∂ybj(y(q)), and the sums over the intermediate indices are finite.

3.1step 2.1L1algebra

In the special case r=s=0 the double sum is empty and the law reduces to T′(y(q))=T(x(q)); in the case r=1,s=0 it reduces to the vector transformation law and in the case r=0,s=1 to the covector law of step 1.1.

3.2step 2.1L1L5L6L7given

Suppose T has C∞ components in the charts of one smooth atlas A. Let (V,y) be any smooth chart and q∈V; choose a chart (U,x) of A with q∈U (the charts of A cover M). By step 2.1 the components of T in y equal the finite sum of step 2.1, whose factors are: the numbers computed from the components of T in x, which are C∞ functions of x by hypothesis, evaluated along the smooth map x; and the Jacobian entries ∂ya∂xc∘x and ∂xd∂yb∘y, which are C∞ on the overlap by [L5] and [L6]. By [L7] the sum is C∞ on y(U∩V). Since q and (V,y) were arbitrary, the components of T are C∞ in every smooth chart, so T is a smooth tensor field by [L1]. The converse direction is immediate from [L1], since the maximal atlas contains every smooth atlas.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2∎

Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1 prove the transformation law and step 3.2 proves the smoothness criterion.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources