Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact adjunction and induced stability with its actual image lattice

Statement

Assume AC. Let Di be essentially small full triangulated subcategories of locally small triangulated categories Ti with set-indexed coproducts, for i=1,2. All objects of Di are compact in Ti. Assume countable homotopy colimits in Ti are given by the mapping-telescope cone and take compatible sequences of triangles to triangles. Let F:T1→T2 be exact and preserve coproducts, and let L:T2→T1 be an exact left adjoint. Suppose F(D1)⊂D2, L(D2)⊂D1, F−1(D2)=D1, and F is conservative on D1 (an object whose image is zero is zero). Let (Z,P) be a locally finite support-property stability condition on D2, with charge v:K(D2)→Λ in a finite-rank free group. Suppose FL(P(θ))⊂P([θ,+∞))for every real θ. Then Q(θ)={E∈D1:F(E)∈P(θ)},Z1(E)=Z(v(F(E))) is a locally finite support-property stability condition. Its charge lattice is exactly Λ1=im⁡(vF)⊂Λ, with the restricted charge and inherited norm. For every interval I, Q(I)=F−1(P(I)). In particular the heart is F−1(P((a,a+1])) and F is exact and conservative on it; F takes every induced HN filtration to the HN filtration of the image with the same nonzero factors and phases. No support property on an unspecified larger lattice is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Exactly the ambient, adjunction, compactness, bounded-reflection, and stability hypotheses of the Statement. A pre-aisle means an extension-closed full subcategory closed under [1]; a cocomplete pre-aisle is also closed under coproducts. An aisle is the first term U of a t-structure (U,U⊥[1]). The telescope of B0→B1→⋯ is the cone of 1−shift on ⨁Bk. All sets of representatives and simultaneous choices below use AC.

[F1]

The slicing, HN, phase, local strict-exact structure and support definitions are those of Bridgeland stability condition with support property. Cochains, cones and shifts use Derived category of an abelian category.

[F2]

The Axiom of Choice is the ambient choice premise. In the geometric applications, the ambient categories and their compactness/reflection properties must be verified separately; they are not consequences of the word “derived”.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2construct

Compact cellular aisle construction. Let S be a set of compact objects of T, closed under [1], and let U be its generated cocomplete pre-aisle. For any M, set B0=M. At stage k, take the coproduct Ck of one copy of each S0∈S for each morphism S0→Bk, use its evaluation map, and complete Ck→Bk→Bk+1 to a triangle. These are set-indexed coproducts by local smallness. For B∞=hocolim⁡Bk, compactness and the telescope triangle give Hom⁡(S0,B∞)=colim⁡kHom⁡(S0,Bk)=0: every element dies at the next stage. For clarity, applying Hom to the telescope triangle gives this equality because 1−shift is injective on a direct sum, both for S0 and S0[−1]. Vanishing for all S0 implies vanishing from all U, since S contains its positive shifts, Hom turns coproducts into products, and the long exact Hom sequence preserves the required zero groups under extensions.

2.1step 1.1algebraconstruct

The octahedral axiom constructs compatible triangles Ak→M→Bk with A0=0 and triangles Ak→Ak+1→Ck. Thus Ak∈U. Set A∞=hocolim⁡Ak. The telescope formula shows A∞∈U: its defining cone is an extension of ⨁Ak[1] by ⨁Ak, both in U. Exactness of compatible telescopes gives A∞→M→B∞. Hence every object has a triangle with first term in U and last term in U⊥, and (U,U⊥[1]) is a t-structure. Orthogonality also proves uniqueness and functoriality of these truncations: a map between middle terms has unique compatible maps between the first and last terms by the long exact Hom sequence. This proves the aisle assertion rather than importing an aisle-generation theorem.

3.1F1step 2.1construct

Extend each target phase cut. Fix t∈R and let S2 represent P((t,+∞))⊂D2. This is closed under [1]. Its generated aisle U~2,t in T2 exists by steps 1.1–2.1. The usual finite HN triangle split at t already gives a t-structure on D2, with high-phase aisle U2,t=P((t,+∞)) and low-phase orthogonal P((−∞,t]). A low-phase object is orthogonal to every element of S2, hence to U~2,t. Consequently that finite HN triangle is also the ambient truncation triangle. This proves that the ambient t-structure restricts to the given one on D2, including all intervals and shifts.

4.1givenstep 2.1step 3.1algebra

Generate the aisle U~1,t by L(S2). These objects are compact because L(D2)⊂D1. Adjunction identifies its orthogonal with F−1(U~2,t⊥). Moreover FL(S2)⊂U2,t: the assumption moves each phase only upwards, and finite HN extensions retain the strict inequality >t. Since F is exact and preserves coproducts, it sends U~1,t into U~2,t. It also sends orthogonals into orthogonals by the preceding adjunction identity. Thus it takes ambient truncation triangles to ambient truncation triangles, so is t-exact for this cut.

5.1givenstep 4.1algebra

If E∈D1, its ambient truncations have images equal to the target truncations of F(E)∈D2. Those images lie in D2, so bounded reflection F−1(D2)=D1 puts the source truncations in D1. We therefore have a t-structure on D1. Its low-phase part is the preimage of the target low-phase part by adjunction. Its high-phase part is also the preimage: if F(E) lies in the target high-phase aisle, the low truncation of E has zero image and is zero by conservativity. This reasoning applies to each t and each shift.

6.1F1step 5.1constructalgebra

HN closure and the slicing. Let the nonzero HN factors of F(E) have phases θ1>⋯>θm. Choose cuts strictly between consecutive phases and below and above the endpoint phases. The source truncations from step 5.1 map to the corresponding target truncations. Their differences give a finite filtration of E whose factors have images equal to the target HN factors, and hence lie in Q(θj). To verify this last assertion, cut immediately above and below θj; its image is concentrated at that single phase, so both preimage cut conditions hold. Conservativity excludes zero or extra factors. Shift compatibility follows from F[1]=[1]F. For A∈Q(α) and B∈Q(β) with α>β, choose a cut between them; the source t-structure gives Hom⁡(A,B)=0. This does not assume that F is faithful on the whole derived category. The charge ray condition follows from the ray condition of the nonzero image. Thus (Q,Z1) is a pre-stability condition, and its HN image is exactly the target HN filtration. The same cut argument proves the asserted equality for every interval, including open or closed endpoints, by the smallest and largest HN phases.

7.1step 5.1step 6.1algebra

The heart at a is the indicated preimage. Its kernel and cokernel are the heart truncations of a cone, and t-exactness makes F exact on the heart. Conservativity makes it faithful there: the image of a morphism with zero image has zero object-image, hence vanishes; a morphism in an abelian category with zero image is zero. This argument proves heart faithfulness only where it is used, without incorrectly asserting faithfulness on all derived morphisms.

8.1F1step 6.1step 7.1algebra∎

Local finiteness and the actual lattice. Shrink the target uniform local-finiteness number η so that 2η<1. Each Q((t−η,t+η)) embeds in a source heart of length-one phase width. Its strict exact sequences are precisely triangles all of whose three terms lie in that interval. F takes such triangles to strict exact sequences in P((t−η,t+η)). A nonzero strict quotient stays nonzero by conservativity. Any ascending or descending strict chain of a fixed object would therefore give an equally long strict chain of its image in the finite-length target interval. The target length bounds the source chain, proving local finiteness with the same η. A subgroup Λ1 of a finite-rank free abelian group is itself finite-rank free: successively project to a coordinate Z, choose a generator of the image subgroup, and split off its lift; induction proves this assertion and finite generation. Restrict Z and the ambient real-vector-space norm to Λ1⊗R, which is the real span of that subgroup. For every nonzero Q-semistable E, F(E) is nonzero semistable, so ∥vF(E)∥≤C∣Z(vF(E))∣. This proves the support property on the actual image with exactly the inherited bound, completing all stability axioms.

Remarks

For a finite flat map f:Y→X inducing a condition from Y to X, set D1=Db(X), D2=Db(Y) and F=Lf∗. A left adjoint L is needed; Rf∗ is the RIGHT adjoint, and substituting it on the wrong side invalidates the argument. The following ramified finite-map lemma supplies the correctly typed left adjoint and converts the useful f∗f∗P(θ)⊂P(≤θ) condition to the hypothesis here. For a finite closed immersion i:X↪Y, instead use F=i∗ and L=Li∗, so the needed inequality is i∗Li∗P(θ)⊂P(≥θ).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources