How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Compact adjunction and induced stability with its actual image lattice
Statement
Assume AC. Let be essentially small full triangulated subcategories of locally small triangulated categories with set-indexed coproducts, for . All objects of are compact in . Assume countable homotopy colimits in are given by the mapping-telescope cone and take compatible sequences of triangles to triangles. Let be exact and preserve coproducts, and let be an exact left adjoint. Suppose , , , and is conservative on (an object whose image is zero is zero). Let be a locally finite support-property stability condition on , with charge in a finite-rank free group. Suppose Then is a locally finite support-property stability condition. Its charge lattice is exactly , with the restricted charge and inherited norm. For every interval , . In particular the heart is and is exact and conservative on it; takes every induced HN filtration to the HN filtration of the image with the same nonzero factors and phases. No support property on an unspecified larger lattice is asserted.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Exactly the ambient, adjunction, compactness, bounded-reflection, and stability hypotheses of the Statement. A pre-aisle means an extension-closed full subcategory closed under ; a cocomplete pre-aisle is also closed under coproducts. An aisle is the first term of a t-structure . The telescope of is the cone of on . All sets of representatives and simultaneous choices below use AC.
The slicing, HN, phase, local strict-exact structure and support definitions are those of Bridgeland stability condition with support property. Cochains, cones and shifts use Derived category of an abelian category.
The Axiom of Choice is the ambient choice premise. In the geometric applications, the ambient categories and their compactness/reflection properties must be verified separately; they are not consequences of the word “derived”.
Proof
Compact cellular aisle construction. Let be a set of compact objects of , closed under , and let be its generated cocomplete pre-aisle. For any , set . At stage , take the coproduct of one copy of each for each morphism , use its evaluation map, and complete to a triangle. These are set-indexed coproducts by local smallness. For , compactness and the telescope triangle give : every element dies at the next stage. For clarity, applying Hom to the telescope triangle gives this equality because is injective on a direct sum, both for and . Vanishing for all implies vanishing from all , since contains its positive shifts, Hom turns coproducts into products, and the long exact Hom sequence preserves the required zero groups under extensions.
The octahedral axiom constructs compatible triangles with and triangles . Thus . Set . The telescope formula shows : its defining cone is an extension of by , both in . Exactness of compatible telescopes gives . Hence every object has a triangle with first term in and last term in , and is a t-structure. Orthogonality also proves uniqueness and functoriality of these truncations: a map between middle terms has unique compatible maps between the first and last terms by the long exact Hom sequence. This proves the aisle assertion rather than importing an aisle-generation theorem.
Extend each target phase cut. Fix and let represent . This is closed under . Its generated aisle in exists by steps 1.1–2.1. The usual finite HN triangle split at already gives a t-structure on , with high-phase aisle and low-phase orthogonal . A low-phase object is orthogonal to every element of , hence to . Consequently that finite HN triangle is also the ambient truncation triangle. This proves that the ambient t-structure restricts to the given one on , including all intervals and shifts.
Generate the aisle by . These objects are compact because . Adjunction identifies its orthogonal with . Moreover : the assumption moves each phase only upwards, and finite HN extensions retain the strict inequality . Since is exact and preserves coproducts, it sends into . It also sends orthogonals into orthogonals by the preceding adjunction identity. Thus it takes ambient truncation triangles to ambient truncation triangles, so is t-exact for this cut.
If , its ambient truncations have images equal to the target truncations of . Those images lie in , so bounded reflection puts the source truncations in . We therefore have a t-structure on . Its low-phase part is the preimage of the target low-phase part by adjunction. Its high-phase part is also the preimage: if lies in the target high-phase aisle, the low truncation of has zero image and is zero by conservativity. This reasoning applies to each and each shift.
HN closure and the slicing. Let the nonzero HN factors of have phases . Choose cuts strictly between consecutive phases and below and above the endpoint phases. The source truncations from step 5.1 map to the corresponding target truncations. Their differences give a finite filtration of whose factors have images equal to the target HN factors, and hence lie in . To verify this last assertion, cut immediately above and below ; its image is concentrated at that single phase, so both preimage cut conditions hold. Conservativity excludes zero or extra factors. Shift compatibility follows from . For and with , choose a cut between them; the source t-structure gives . This does not assume that is faithful on the whole derived category. The charge ray condition follows from the ray condition of the nonzero image. Thus is a pre-stability condition, and its HN image is exactly the target HN filtration. The same cut argument proves the asserted equality for every interval, including open or closed endpoints, by the smallest and largest HN phases.
The heart at is the indicated preimage. Its kernel and cokernel are the heart truncations of a cone, and t-exactness makes exact on the heart. Conservativity makes it faithful there: the image of a morphism with zero image has zero object-image, hence vanishes; a morphism in an abelian category with zero image is zero. This argument proves heart faithfulness only where it is used, without incorrectly asserting faithfulness on all derived morphisms.
Local finiteness and the actual lattice. Shrink the target uniform local-finiteness number so that . Each embeds in a source heart of length-one phase width. Its strict exact sequences are precisely triangles all of whose three terms lie in that interval. takes such triangles to strict exact sequences in . A nonzero strict quotient stays nonzero by conservativity. Any ascending or descending strict chain of a fixed object would therefore give an equally long strict chain of its image in the finite-length target interval. The target length bounds the source chain, proving local finiteness with the same . A subgroup of a finite-rank free abelian group is itself finite-rank free: successively project to a coordinate , choose a generator of the image subgroup, and split off its lift; induction proves this assertion and finite generation. Restrict and the ambient real-vector-space norm to , which is the real span of that subgroup. For every nonzero -semistable , is nonzero semistable, so This proves the support property on the actual image with exactly the inherited bound, completing all stability axioms.
Remarks
For a finite flat map inducing a condition from to , set , and . A left adjoint is needed; is the RIGHT adjoint, and substituting it on the wrong side invalidates the argument. The following ramified finite-map lemma supplies the correctly typed left adjoint and converts the useful condition to the hypothesis here. For a finite closed immersion , instead use and , so the needed inequality is .