Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regular-base acyclicity for finite-length perfect complexes

Statement

Assume AC. Let R be a regular local ring of dimension c and F a bounded finite free complex whose cohomology has finite length. If its free terms are in degrees [a,b] and c>b−a, then F is acyclic. If c=d, its free terms are in [−d,0], and H0(F)=kR, then F is quasi-isomorphic to kR in degree zero. On a regular finite-dimensional Noetherian scheme, a perfect complex of cohomological support codimension at least c whose local minimal free models have length less than c is zero. No assertion about a non-Cohen–Macaulay singular local ring is made.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume full AC, as defined by The Axiom of Choice, for selecting parameter systems and free models. No extra coherent/projective supplier and no independent DC premise is used. No Haiman n! or general derived-McKay theorem is assumed.

Proof

Given: Exactly the objects and hypotheses of the Statement.

1.1givenA1F1algebra

Let R be a regular local ring of dimension c and let F be a bounded finite free complex, supported only at the closed point. Define the local-cohomology operation explicitly by tensoring with the stable Čech complex C(x)=⊗j=1c[R→R[xj−1]], for a regular parameter system. It is the filtered colimit of the dual Koszul complexes on x1k,…,xck. These powers remain a regular sequence, so their Koszul cohomology is only in degree c; exactness of filtered module colimits gives the same for C(x). For a finite-length module all parameter localizations vanish, so C(x)⊗M=M in degree zero. Filtering C(x)⊗F by the cohomology of F therefore gives C(x)⊗F=F. Filtering instead by the finite free terms of F shows cohomology only in [a+c,b+c] if its free terms are in [a,b]. The original F has cohomology only in [a,b]. Whenever c>b−a, these intervals are disjoint and F=0. This supplies the actual local-cohomology argument without an unnamed intersection-theorem input.

2.1givenA1F1step 1.1algebra

More generally, let T be a regular finite-dimensional Noetherian scheme. If a perfect complex on T has support codimension≥c and its local minimal free models have length <c, it is zero. If not, localize at a minimal prime of its nonzero cohomological support. This is a regular local ring of dimension at least c, and all its homology has finite length. Cancel unit entries in a free model to retain the prescribed length and apply the previous paragraph. This proves the off-diagonal vanishing criterion needed below without an intersection theorem over a singular ring.

3.1givenA1F1step 2.1algebra∎

If the support is a single closed point x of a regular Noetherian scheme and the local ring at x has dimension d, a free model in degrees [−d,0] has cohomology only in degree zero: intersect [−d,0] with [0,d] in the same local-cohomology calculation. If its H⁰ is k, the complex is therefore k. This is the diagonal criterion; it needs known regularity, which the geometric Hilbert supplier supplies.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources