How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Regular-base acyclicity for finite-length perfect complexes
Statement
Assume AC. Let R be a regular local ring of dimension c and F a bounded finite free complex whose cohomology has finite length. If its free terms are in degrees [a,b] and , then F is acyclic. If , its free terms are in [−d,0], and , then F is quasi-isomorphic to in degree zero. On a regular finite-dimensional Noetherian scheme, a perfect complex of cohomological support codimension at least c whose local minimal free models have length less than c is zero. No assertion about a non-Cohen–Macaulay singular local ring is made.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Assume full AC, as defined by The Axiom of Choice, for selecting parameter systems and free models. No extra coherent/projective supplier and no independent DC premise is used. No Haiman n! or general derived-McKay theorem is assumed.
The exact mathematical interfaces used are regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay, localisations of regular local rings are regular, Derived category of an abelian category, The Axiom of Choice.
Proof
Given: Exactly the objects and hypotheses of the Statement.
Let R be a regular local ring of dimension c and let F be a bounded finite free complex, supported only at the closed point. Define the local-cohomology operation explicitly by tensoring with the stable Čech complex , for a regular parameter system. It is the filtered colimit of the dual Koszul complexes on . These powers remain a regular sequence, so their Koszul cohomology is only in degree c; exactness of filtered module colimits gives the same for C(x). For a finite-length module all parameter localizations vanish, so in degree zero. Filtering C(x)⊗F by the cohomology of F therefore gives . Filtering instead by the finite free terms of F shows cohomology only in [a+c,b+c] if its free terms are in [a,b]. The original F has cohomology only in [a,b]. Whenever , these intervals are disjoint and . This supplies the actual local-cohomology argument without an unnamed intersection-theorem input.
More generally, let T be a regular finite-dimensional Noetherian scheme. If a perfect complex on T has support codimension≥c and its local minimal free models have length , it is zero. If not, localize at a minimal prime of its nonzero cohomological support. This is a regular local ring of dimension at least c, and all its homology has finite length. Cancel unit entries in a free model to retain the prescribed length and apply the previous paragraph. This proves the off-diagonal vanishing criterion needed below without an intersection theorem over a singular ring.
If the support is a single closed point x of a regular Noetherian scheme and the local ring at x has dimension d, a free model in degrees [−d,0] has cohomology only in degree zero: intersect [−d,0] with [0,d] in the same local-cohomology calculation. If its H⁰ is k, the complex is therefore k. This is the diagonal criterion; it needs known regularity, which the geometric Hilbert supplier supplies.