Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A smooth curve Brill–Noether gap gives strict threefold small-slope BG

Statement

Assume AC. Let X be a smooth integral projective complex threefold with KX≅OX and H1(X,OX)=0, and let H be ample Cartier. Suppose that for a positive integer a, putting A=aH, there are smooth integral S∈∣A∣ and C∈∣A∣S∣ with BN⁡C<χ(OX(A)). Then there is ϵH>0 such that every ordinary H-slope-stable torsion-free coherent sheaf E with 0<μH(E)≤ϵH satisfies Hch⁡2(E)<−12H2ch⁡1(E). In particular one may choose ϵH=ae/(2+3e), where h=A3, η=(χ(OX(A))−BN⁡C)/2, M=min⁡(1/2,η/[4h(h+1)]), and e=min⁡(1/6,M/(2+M),t/(4h+3t)) for any t>0 on which the stable curve-bundle bound h0(F)/rk⁡F≤χ(OX(A))−η holds at slopes within t of g(C)−1=h. Such a t exists by the definition of BN⁡C.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Exactly the smooth threefold, integer multiple, smooth integral surface and curve, and strict curve gap in the Statement. All curve slope factors in the proof are vector bundles on the smooth curve; ordinary surface sheaves may be torsion-free. Work in ZF + AC.

[F1]

Gamma-BMT inequality and curve Brill–Noether number fixes ordinary slope and the near-middle rank-uniform curve Brill–Noether supremum. Smooth surface tilt hearts, HN, discriminant, numerical-line transport and the line object supplies actual two-dimensional tilted hearts, rational noetherianity, HN, discriminant/support, finite local vertical classes, real same-object numerical-line transport and large-volume classification. The converse on the two integer lines is proved below.

[F2]

Small-slope counterexample with uniform HN bounds on every integral hyperplane restriction supplies the actual threefold counterexample and uniform surface-restriction HN certificate. Ordinary sheaf Bogomolov Gieseker discriminant inequality supplies ordinary numerical BG on smooth surfaces and threefolds. The proof below does not apply the threefold-only certificate to a surface.

[F3]

Homogeneous representations preserve slope semistability in characteristic zero supplies tensor semistability for the smooth curve HN factors and their duals. Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch for projective morphisms supplies the coherent-complex and divisor-immersion Chern/Euler identities through finite locally free resolutions.

[F4]

Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety supplies the bundle dualities used below, and The Hodge index theorem for smooth projective surfaces supplies the surface intersection inequality. Smooth regular-local reflexive sheaves in dimension two are locally free by the depth/Auslander–Buchsbaum construction in F1.

[F5]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the coherent and finite-choice suppliers.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4F5givenconstruct

Surface large-volume converse on both sides. Let T be a smooth integral projective surface, L ample Cartier, h=L2, and C0=hrk,C1=Lch1,C2=ch2. Use the actual surface heart Bb and source slope (C2−wC0)/(C1−bC0). The smooth-surface tilt supplier gives rational-heart noetherianity, HN, Δ≥0, numerical-line transport, local finite classes on positive vertical compact intervals, and the large-volume classification. We also need its converse, which follows directly as follows.

2.1F1F2F3F4F5step 1.1construct

Let E be an ordinary slope-stable vector bundle and b rational, different from μ(E). Put a=2w−b2>0. If b<μ(E), a destabilizing first HN subobject A⊂E is a coherent torsion-free sheaf. The ordinary exact sequence 0→K→A→G→0 has K∈Fb and G⊂E; consequently μ(A)≤μ(E). Equality is possible only if K=0 and G has full rank and the same first Chern class, giving db(A)=db(E). A proper destabilizer has 0<db(A)<db(E): equality of denominators would leave a null quotient, whose surface charge is strictly negative real, making the subobject's phase smaller than the total's. Thus μ(A)<μ(E). Write x=C0(A)/db(A)>C0(E)/db(E)=xE>0. Since db(A) ranges over a fixed discrete set in (0,db(E)) and C0(A) is a positive multiple of h, the possible x have a uniform positive gap above xE. BG gives the conventional slope bound λa(A)≤1/(2x)−a x/2. This decreasing function is, for all sufficiently large a, strictly below λa(E)=ch2b(E)/db(E)−axE/2. This contradicts destabilization. Therefore E is tilt-semistable at b for large w.

3.1F1F2F3F4F5step 2.1construct

If b>μ(E), a last HN quotient of E[1] is Q=G[1]. Ordinary cohomology gives 0→K→E→G→T→0 with G torsion-free in Fb and T∈Tb. The image I of E→G is nonzero, since otherwise G=T belongs to both torsion-pair parts. Since I is a torsion-free quotient of the stable bundle E,μ(I)≥μ(E); adding T gives μ(G)≥μ(E). Equality forces K=0,I=E and T zero-dimensional. Then G/E is zero-dimensional; reflexivity gives E⊂G⊂G∗∗=E, so G=E and the quotient is improper. Hence every proper finite-slope last quotient has μ(G)>μ(E). Null last quotients have phase one and cannot have smaller phase. With y=C0(G)/db(Q)>1/(b−μ(E))=yE, the same discrete-denominator argument gives a uniform positive gap. BG gives λa(Q)≥−1/(2y)+a y/2, which is eventually strictly above λa(E[1]); it cannot be a destabilizing last quotient. Thus E[1] is semistable for large w. No surface derived-dual statement is needed.

4.1F1F2F3F4F5step 3.1construct

For an ordinary stable torsion-free E rather than a bundle, the b<μ argument is identical. The b>μ assertion is only used after replacing E by its reflexive hull, which is locally free on a smooth surface by the actual surface regular-local/Auslander–Buchsbaum argument.

5.1F1F2F3F4F5step 4.1construct

Actual dimension-two minimal counterexample. Fix 0<e<1/3 and put m=2e/(1−e). Define the continuous function f by f(x)=−x/2 for 0≤x≤e,f(x)=(1+e)x/[2(1−e)]−e/(1−e) for e≤x≤m, and f(x)=x2/2 for x≥m. Suppose an ordinary stable torsion-free sheaf A has 0<μ(A)≤e and C2(A)≥−C1(A)/2. Form the set of positive-rank derived classes E with 0<μ≤m,C2/C0≥f(μ), represented either by a semistable E∈B0 at w>0 or by semistable E[1]∈B1 at w>1/2. Section 1 makes this set nonempty. Choose its lexicographic minimum (Δ,C1), where Δ is a nonnegative integer and C1 a positive integer.

6.1F1F2F3F4F5step 5.1construct

Here are the complete descent inequalities. The ratio f(x)/x is nondecreasing on (0,m]. Thus a numerical line from (μ,y≥f(μ)) to (0,w), w>0, remains on or above f at every 0<x≤μ. The ratio (f(x)−1/2)/(1−x) is nonincreasing on [0,1): its three pieces are −(1+x)/[2(1−x)], the constant −(1+e)/[2(1−e)], and −(1+x)/2. Thus a line toward (1,w), w>1/2, remains above f for μ≤x<1; for x≥m and x>μ it is strictly above the parabola and cannot carry a semistable class.

7.1F1F2F3F4F5step 6.1construct

At b=0, an equal-finite-phase binary split has two positive denominators whose C1 add to C1(E). Positive-rank factors have total rank at least the total rank; their positive C1 have sum at most the total C1. Hence some positive-rank factor has slope in (0,μ(E)]. The preceding graph inequality places it in the same minimizing set. At b=1, apply the same average to the negative-rank factors of E[1], using their denominators Ri(1−μi): one factor has μi≥μ(E), and the second graph inequality and Δ≥0 force μi≤m. Undoing its shift again gives an element of the same set.

8.1F1F2F3F4F5step 7.1construct

For a fixed finite-phase ray the discriminant has the forward Lorentz-cone form supplied by surface tilt BG. Thus each positive-denominator factor has strictly smaller Δ than its sum, except when both factors are proportional null vectors. In that exceptional case its positive C₁ is strictly smaller than C₁(E). Both cases contradict the lexicographic minimum. There is therefore no equal-finite-phase split at either vertical line. The rational vertical finite-class argument makes the semistable set locally open; it is closed as an intersection of subobject inequalities. A minimum represented at one point of either line is therefore semistable on that entire positive vertical line.

9.1F1F2F3F4F5step 8.1construct

The actual large-volume classification gives an ordinary semistable torsion-free sheaf F, with a possible zero-dimensional cohomology defect when the initial representative was E[1]. Removing that defect increases C2/C0. In an ordinary stable-factor filtration choose a factor with C2/C0 at least the average. Its Δ is at most its squared rank fraction times the original Δ; a proper fraction strictly lowers Δ, or lowers C1 when Δ=0. Minimality therefore permits an ordinary stable representative. Its reflexive hull remains stable and increases C2 by the length of its zero-dimensional quotient. Minimality permits this replacement too. It is now a vector bundle E, with 0<μ≤m and y=C2/C0≥−μ/2. Section 1 puts E[1] on the b=1 line for large w, and the same descent makes it semistable there for all w>1/2. Thus E and E(−L)[1] are both semistable in B0 for every w>0. This establishes the required certificate within surface tilt theory.

10.1F1F2F3F4F5step 9.1construct

Restriction to the smooth curve, with the actual degree normalization. Let C∈|L| be smooth integral. Since E is a bundle, restriction gives the B₀ exact sequence 0→E→i_(E|C)→E(−L)[1]→0. Its endpoint slopes are l(w)=(y−w)/μ and u(w)=(w−y+μ−1/2)/(1−μ). For a vector bundle G on C, GRR for the actual closed immersion gives C₁(i_G)=h rk G and C₂(i_*G)=deg G−h rk G/2. Thus its tilt slope is deg G/(h rk G)−1/2; ordinary curve slope is degree/rank, and the normalized curve slope is the latter divided by h.

11.1F1F2F3F4F5step 10.1construct

The endpoints coincide at w0=y−μ2+μ/2. If w0>0, their extension is semistable there, and every ordinary curve subbundle and quotient pushes to a B0 subobject or quotient. Hence E|C is slope-semistable. If w0≤0, then l(w)≤u(w) for all w>0; finite HN and phase orthogonality put all HN slopes of the extension between these endpoints. Apply this to the maximal ordinary curve HN subbundle and minimal ordinary curve HN quotient, and let w decrease to zero. One obtains

12.1F1F2F3F4F5step 11.1construct

0≤μ_min(E|C)/h, μ_max(E|C)/h≤μ/(1−μ)≤2e/(1−3e).

13.1F1F2F3F4F5step 12.1construct

Together with the w₀>0 case this proves, on the surface itself, the uniform small-interval restriction certificate needed by the smooth numerical contradiction.

14.1F1F2F3F4F5step 13.1construct

Curve gap gives strict surface BG. Now assume KT=L and B=BNC<χ=χ(OT). Put η=(χ−B)/2>0 and choose t>0 such that every semistable curve bundle whose slope differs from h=g(C)−1 by less than t has h0/rk≤χ−η. This follows directly from the definition of BN and finite stable-factor filtrations.

15.1F1F2F3F4F5step 14.1construct

Set M=min(1/2,η/[4h(h+1)]) and. e=min(1/6, M/(2+M), t/(4h+3t)).

16.1F1F2F3F4F5step 15.1construct

Suppose strict BG2(e) fails. Sections 2–3 give a stable vector bundle E with 0<μ≤2e/(1−e)≤M,ch2(E)≥−Lc1(E)/2 and curve HN slopes in [0,2he/(1−3e)]⊂[0,t/2]. The installed homogeneous-representation lemma gives semistability of each tensor HN factor Fi⊗Fj∗ on the smooth curve. Their L twists have slopes within t of h. Hence h0(End⁡(E∣C)(L))≤(χ−η)r2.

17.1F1F2F3F4F5step 16.1construct

Stability gives Hom⁡(E,E)=C. Surface Serre duality, the restriction sequence for End E(L), actual GRR for End E, and Hodge index give, with D=Lc1(E)>0 and q=ch2(E),

18.1F1F2F3F4F5step 17.1construct

χr²−(c₁(E)²−2rq)=χ(E,E) ≤2+h⁰(End(E|C)(L))≤2+(χ−η)r², c₁(E)²≤D²/h.

19.1F1F2F3F4F5step 18.1construct

Consequently q/(hr)≤μ²/2−η/(2h)+1/(hr²). The positive integer D forces r≥1/(hμ), so 1/(hr²)≤hμ². Therefore

20.1F1F2F3F4F5step 19.1construct

q/(hr)+μ/2≤(h+1/2)μ²+μ/2−η/(2h) ≤(h+1)M−η/(2h)≤−η/(4h)<0,. contradicting q≥−D/2. Thus BG₂(e) holds for all stable torsion-free sheaves, since passage to the stable reflexive hull only increases ch₂.

21.1F1F2F3F4F5step 20.1construct

Smooth surface gap gives the actual threefold BG input. Let X be a smooth projective CY threefold, H ample Cartier, A=aH with positive integer a. Suppose S∈∣A∣ and C∈∣A∣S∣ are smooth integral and BNC<χ(OX(A)). Adjunction gives KS=A∣S and g(C)−1=A3; the divisor sequence and CY Serre duality give χ(OS)=χ(OX(A)). Section 4 supplies BG2(e) on S. Ordinary smooth-surface BG and Hodge index give ch2≤0 for slope-zero stable factors.

22.1F1F2F3F4F5step 21.1construct

Choose ε=e/(2+3e), so 2ε/(1−3ε)=e. The actual threefold small-slope restriction certificate, applied to a failed BG3A(ε), gives a reflexive stable E whose torsion-free restriction to S has all normalized HN slopes in [0,e]. Add the strict BG2 inequalities of its positive-slope stable factors and the nonpositive inequalities of its zero-slope factors. At least one slope is positive. Their sum is ch2(E∣S)<−c1(E∣S)A∣S/2, contradicting the certificate's ch2(E)A≥−c1(E)A2/2. The restriction identities follow because E is torsion-free and S Cartier, so Tor1(E,OS)=0; the restricted locally free resolution computes the same Chern character.

23.1F1F2F3F4F5step 22.1construct∎

Hence BG₃^A(ε) holds. Returning to H gives μ_A=μ_H/a and ch₂(E)H<−a c₁(E)H²/2 whenever 0<μ_H≤aε. Since a≥1, this implies the desired strict BG₃^H(aε). This completes the smooth curve-gap reduction used by all thirteen weighted rows and by every smooth Fano/cyclic ladder row. It assumes no singular-surface RR or singular curve tensor theorem.

Remarks

This is a research-only source candidate. The full named-family claim additionally requires its actual smooth family ladders; none is inferred from the strict numerical curve gap. The dimension-two restriction certificate is reconstructed here. The actual source-reading limits are recorded in the companion research note; no additional full-text reading is claimed.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources