Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch for projective morphisms

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) inherited from the finite coherent-resolution and cohomological suppliers. Let k be an algebraically closed field and let f:X→Y be a projective morphism of nonsingular irreducible quasi-projective k-schemes of finite type (Projective morphisms before Proj, Smooth morphism of schemes, Proper morphisms); projectivity is exactly the hypothesis that f factors as a closed immersion i:X↪Pkn×kY followed by the projection p:Pkn×kY→Y for some n≥0 (A projective morphism has a relative Proj presentation). Then for every α∈K0(X) (Grothendieck groups of coherent sheaves and of vector bundles on a scheme, Vector-bundle K-theory equals coherent K-theory on regular quasi-projective schemes): ch⁡(f!(α))⋅td⁡(TY)  =  f∗(ch⁡(α)⋅td⁡(TX))in A∗(Y)Q, where ch⁡,td⁡ are the Chern character and Todd class of The Chern character and the Todd class, f! is the K-theory pushforward (Pushforward of coherent sheaves in algebraic K-theory) and f∗ is the proper Chow pushforward (Proper pushforward of cycles and the norm formula). Equivalently τY∘f!=f∗∘τX for τS(α)=ch⁡(α)td⁡(TS). For Y=Spec⁡k this is Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch χ(X,F)=deg⁡(ch⁡(F)td⁡(TX)) (Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice; an algebraically closed field k; a projective morphism f:X→Y of nonsingular irreducible quasi-projective finite type k-schemes; a factorization f=p∘i with i:X↪Pkn×kY a closed immersion and p the projection.

[L1]

Riemann-Roch holds for the closed immersion i: ch⁡(i∗E)=i∗(ch⁡(E)td⁡(N)−1), equivalently τ∘i∗=i∗∘τ (Riemann-Roch for regular embeddings).

[L2]

Riemann-Roch holds for the projection p: τY∘p!=p∗∘τPn×kY (Riemann-Roch for projective-space projections).

[L3]

K-theory pushforward is functorial under composition, (p∘i)!=p!∘i!, and Chow proper pushforward is functorial, (p∘i)∗=p∗i∗; K0 on the smooth quasi-projective source is generated by vector bundles (Pushforward of coherent sheaves in algebraic K-theory, Proper pushforward of cycles and the norm formula, Vector-bundle K-theory equals coherent K-theory on regular quasi-projective schemes).

[L4]

The projection formula and naturality of the Chern character and Todd class for flat morphisms identify the two composites; the target of τ is the codimension-graded Chow group of a smooth scheme (Naturality of the Chow ring and the projection formula, Additivity and multiplicativity of the Chern character and Todd class, Projection formula for higher direct images and K-theory pushforward).

Proof

technique · direct; factor the projective morphism into a closed immersion followed by a projective-space projection and compose the two Riemann-Roch squares
1.1L3givenalgebra

The factorization. By the relative Proj presentation of a projective morphism, f factors as f=p∘i with i:X↪Pkn×kY a closed immersion of nonsingular varieties and p the projection; both factors are morphisms of nonsingular irreducible quasi-projective k-schemes, and p is the projection to the second factor.

2.1L1L2L3step 1.1algebra

Composition of the two squares. Consider the two commutative squares: τ∘i∗=i∗∘τ on X→Pn×kY by [L1], and τ∘p!=p∗∘τ on Pn×kY→Y by [L2]. Composing them gives τY∘p!∘i!=p∗∘i∗∘τX, and by the functoriality of both pushforwards, p!∘i!=f! and p∗i∗=f∗, this is exactly τY∘f!=f∗∘τX, the displayed formula.

3.1L3L4step 2.1givenalgebra∎

Coherent classes and Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch. Since X is smooth and quasi-projective, K0(X)=K0(X) and the identity proved for vector bundles extends to all coherent classes by additivity of ch⁡, of f! and of f∗ along finite resolutions [L3]. For Y=Spec⁡k, the Chow pushforward is the degree and the K-theory pushforward is the Euler characteristic, so the formula becomes Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch χ(X,F)=deg⁡(ch⁡(F)td⁡(TX)); the transport of ch⁡ and td⁡ to coherent classes uses the naturality and multiplicativity of [L4].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

99 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources