Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Tame transverse-strip coercivity and actual weighted end inverse

Strip spaces and traces

Fix a Euclidean norm on V. Write S∘=R×(0,1) and Hk(S,V)=Wk,2(S∘;V): weak derivatives are defined in each real coordinate of V, and the squared norm is the sum of their squared L2 norms through order k. For ξ∈H1, define Tjξ as the L2(R;V) limit of ξ(⋅,t) as t→j from the interior. These limits exist: the weak normal derivative gives an L2(R;V)-valued absolutely continuous representative on interior intervals, and ∥ξ(⋅,t)−ξ(⋅,r)∥2≤∣t−r∣1/2∥ξt∥L2(R×(r,t)). The primitive identity follows coordinatewise by testing the weak derivative and subtracting its integral; a distribution with zero derivative is constant. Averaging the primitive formula over an interior interval also gives ∥Tjξ∥2≤C∥ξ∥H1. For k≥1, set Hk(S,V;F0,F1)={ξ∈Hk(S,V):Tjξ(s)∈Fj for almost every s, j=0,1}. This is a closed linear subspace. Weighted spaces mean that multiplication by the stated positive weight belongs to these spaces; the boundary condition is preserved by this scalar multiplication.

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let (V,ω) be a finite-dimensional real symplectic vector space, F0,F1 transverse Lagrangian planes, and Jt a smooth ω-tame family on 0≤t≤1. On S=R×[0,1] set Pξ=ξs+Jtξt and require traces ξ(s,j)∈Fj. For every integer k≥1, P:Hk(S,V;F0,F1)⟶Hk−1(S,V) is an isomorphism, with ∥ξ∥Hk≤Ck∥Pξ∥Hk−1. No selfadjointness or compatibility of Jt is assumed.

For smooth χ with ∣χ′∣≤1 and bounded higher derivatives, the same holds in the norms ∥eδχξ∥Hk and ∥eδχf∥Hk−1 for sufficiently small ∣δ∣, including χ=s and a smoothing of ∣s∣. The constants are uniform on compact smooth families of tame structures and transverse planes. The frozen end operator along a nondegenerate Hamiltonian chord has the same assertion after symplectic-flow conjugation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice and exactly the data and hypotheses of the Statement. The proof uses Countable Choice through Plancherel and the Sobolev conventions, together with finite-dimensional estimates, Fourier inversion, and the explicitly constructed one-dimensional ODE solution; it uses no arbitrary-index choice.

[F1]

Under Countable Choice, Plancherel theorem gives the partial Fourier norm and inversion. The finite-dimensional ODE solution and its boundary linear system are constructed below.

[F2]

Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms fixes the scalar weak derivative convention; the finite-dimensional spaces and continuous traces are defined above, and trace-preserving density and higher estimates are proved below. The explicitly constructed inverse and its norm estimate below already prove boundedness; no abstract bounded-inverse theorem is needed.

[F3]

Lagrangian intersection and Hamiltonian chord data fixes the convention ιXHω=−dH and the precise transverse nondegenerate endpoint planes.

Proof

technique · direct, using the explicit local constructions below
1.1givenconstructalgebra

Choose a fixed Euclidean norm on V. Compactness of the interval/unit sphere gives c>0, M<∞ with ω(v,Jtv)≥c∣v∣2 and ∣Jt∣+∣ω∣≤M. There is a boundary Poincaré constant B: the map F0⊕F1→V, (a,b)↦b−a, is an isomorphism. For a path v(t) with endpoints in the two planes, ∣v(0)∣≤B∣v(1)−v(0)∣≤B∥vt∥2, and the fundamental theorem then gives ∥v∥2≤(B+1)∥vt∥2. The same estimates hold after complexification, applied to real and imaginary parts.

2.1givenconstructalgebrastep 1.1

First take a smooth section compactly supported in s and satisfying the real boundary traces. The radial primitive λV=12ω(x,dx) restricts to zero on each linear Lagrangian plane. Stokes on a sufficiently long finite strip gives ∫Sω(ξs,ξt)=0; the horizontal-edge integrals vanish and the two remote vertical-edge integrals are zero. If f=Pξ, it follows exactly that ∫Sω(ξt,Jtξt)=−∫Sω(f,ξt). Hence c∥ξt∥22≤M∥f∥2∥ξt∥2. Thus ∥ξt∥2≤(M/c)∥f∥2, ∥ξs∥2≤(1+M2/c)∥f∥2, and step 1.1 controls ∥ξ∥2. Therefore ∥ξ∥H1≤C∥Pξ∥2, with no spectral or selfadjointness assumption.

3.1F2givenconstructalgebrastep 2.1

This estimate holds for every H1 section with these traces. For density, near edge j extend across it by the real linear reflection 2ΠFj−I. The boundary trace condition makes the extension H1 with matching values. Use an even normal mollifier so its smoothed boundary value remains fixed by the reflection, hence belongs to Fj. A real partition near the two disjoint edges and a compact s cutoff give the required smooth approximants. Their H1 convergence passes step 2.1 to the limit.

4.1givenconstructalgebrastep 3.1

To prove surjectivity, Fourier transform only in s. For τ∈R, consider Dτψ=iτψ+Jtψ′,ψ(0)∈(F0)C,ψ(1)∈(F1)C. For τ≠0, apply step 2.1 to the REAL periodic map Re⁡(eiτsψ(t)) on one s-period. Its vertical-side integrals cancel by periodicity, so the estimate is unchanged, independently of the period length. Average the squared norms over that period. It gives ∥ψ∥Ht1+∣τ∣∥ψ∥2≤C∥Dτψ∥2. For τ=0, apply the same calculation separately to its two real parts, constant in s. Thus this uniform estimate holds for ALL real τ.

5.1givenconstructalgebrastep 4.1

The one-dimensional boundary operator Dτ is onto. Solve ψ′=iτJtψ−Jtf with an initial vector in (F0)C. The fundamental matrix exists by its convergent iterated-integral series, whose r-th term is bounded by (∣τ∣M)r/r! on the unit interval. Variation of constants gives all H1 solutions for an L2 forcing. Their endpoint condition is a square linear system from the n-dimensional complex initial plane to the n-dimensional quotient VC/(F1)C. Its kernel is zero by step 4.1, so its matrix is invertible. The solution is unique, depends continuously on τ, and has precisely the uniform bound in step 4.1.

6.1F1F2givenconstructalgebrastep 5.1

For f∈L2(S,V), set ξ^(τ)=Dτ−1f^(τ). Continuity in τ gives measurability; the uniform estimate and Plancherel give ξ,ξs,ξt∈L2. The endpoint conditions hold in the Ht1 trace and therefore in the full strip trace. Reality follows from conjugating the equation at τ to that at −τ. Thus ξ∈H1(S,V;F0,F1) and Pξ=f. Step3 gives uniqueness. This is an actual onto inverse, rather than a coercive estimate falsely treated as surjectivity.

7.1F2givenconstructalgebrastep 6.1

For higher orders, P commutes with ∂s. Step6 applied to ∂sjf controls ∂sjξ in H1 for j≤k−1. Recover every additional normal derivative from ξt=Jtξs−Jtf. Differentiate this identity and induct on the number of t derivatives, using the bounded derivatives of Jt. Every total derivative through order k is controlled by the derivatives of f through order k−1. This proves the stated Hk inverse and smoothness up to the two edges for smooth forcing, without imposing artificial boundary compatibility on f.

8.1givenconstructalgebrastep 7.1

Conjugation by w=eδχ gives wPw−1=P−δχ′. The bounded zeroth-order perturbation has norm at most ∣δ∣ from H1 to L2. If ∣δ∣∥P−1∥L2→H1<1/2, its inverse is the norm-convergent Neumann series with norm at most twice that of P−1. Commuting derivatives gives higher estimates as in step 7.1; derivatives of χ′ are bounded, and the lower derivatives are already controlled inductively. This proves the weighted assertion. All constants depend continuously on the finite-dimensional plane angle/tameness bounds and finitely many coefficient derivatives, so are uniform on the stated compact families.

9.1F3givenconstructalgebrastep 8.1∎

Along a Hamiltonian chord γ(t)=ΦHt(p), the symplectic linearized flow sends the two endpoint tangent conditions to the fixed planes TpL0 and (DΦH1)−1Tγ(1)L1. They are transverse exactly by chord nondegeneracy. Conjugating the actual frozen Floer linearization by this flow removes its Hamiltonian zeroth-order evolution term, and sends Jt to the tame structure (DΦHt)−1JtDΦHt. Its principal part is precisely the operator above. Smooth bounded flow matrices on the compact interval preserve all stated norms. This supplies the actual weighted end inverse required by the forthcoming regular polygon collar construction.

Remarks

This is a linear end inverse. It assumes no polygon compactification, nonlinear gluing or orientation theorem. The proof works for tame J and does not import a compatible selfadjoint spectral argument.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources