Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A half-disk small-energy estimate with a nonlinear normal derivative bound

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let e≥0 be C2 on a neighborhood, relative to the closed upper half-plane, of the closed half-disk B‾r+={(s,t):s2+t2≤r2, t≥0}, where r>0. Suppose in its interior and on its flat boundary, respectively, Δe≥−Ae2−Be,∂νe=−et≤ce3/2+de, where A,B,c,d≥0. Put H=max⁡{16A,4096c2,1}. If Br2≤14,dr≤116,E:=∫Br+e<π8H, then e(0,0)≤16πr2E. No condition on the normal derivative at the curved edge is required. This is a scalar estimate with the flat-boundary measure term retained; deriving the differential inequalities for a map is a separate obligation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the nonnegative density, half-disk, constants, and differential inequalities in the statement.

[F1]

Classical C2 functions with nonnegative Laplacian satisfy the ball mean-value inequality, by Classical subharmonic mean value inequalities.

Proof

1.1givenconstructalgebra

Reflect the density evenly, e^(s,t)=e(s,∣t∣), on the full disk. It is continuous and piecewise C2. Distributional integration by parts in the upper and lower half-planes gives Δe^=(Δe)even+2et(s,0+) δ{t=0}, where δ{t=0} denotes integration along the flat line. Indeed the jump of the first t derivative is et(s,0+)−(−et(s,0+))=2et(s,0+). Thus the atom is bounded below by −2(ce(s,0)3/2+de(s,0))δ{t=0}. Its sign is not discarded. The reflected integral is ∫Bre^=2E.

1.2F1construct

We shall use [F1] also for continuous distributionally subharmonic functions. Here is the needed extension. On any relatively compact disk convolve the continuous function with a nonnegative smooth unit-integral bump supported in a radius-ε disk. Such bumps are obtained by normalizing exp⁡(−1/(1−∣x∣2)) on the unit disk and scaling. Positivity of the distributional Laplacian gives nonnegative ordinary Laplacian after convolution, since its value is the distribution evaluated on a translated nonnegative bump. Apply [F1] on disks whose closed ε neighborhood remains in the domain. Uniform continuity on compact subsets makes the convolutions converge uniformly to the original continuous function, so their mean-value inequalities pass to the limit. This proves the stated extension without assuming that a reflected function is C2.

2.1step 1.1givenconstructalgebra

If e(0,0)=0, the conclusion follows from E≥0. Otherwise maximize (r−∣z∣)2e^(z) on the full closed disk, and let z0=(s0,t0) be a point of positive maximum. Put M=e^(z0)>0 and ℓ=(r−∣z0∣)/2. Maximality gives e^≤4M on B‾ℓ(z0) and r2e(0,0)≤4ℓ2M. On this smaller disk the bulk Laplacian is at least −K, with K=16AM2+4BM, and its line atom is at least −2Lδ{t=0}, with L=8cM3/2+4dM. Consequently F(z)=e^(z)+K∣z−z0∣2/4+L∣t∣ is distributionally subharmonic there, since Δ∣t∣=2δ{t=0}.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1givenconstructalgebra

Apply step 1.2 to F on a radius 0<ρ≤ℓ about z0; the endpoint radius follows by continuity if needed. The average of ∣z−z0∣2 is ρ2/2, and ∣∣t∣−∣t0∣∣≤ρ there. Hence M≤1πρ2∫Bρ(z0)e^+M(2AM+B/2)ρ2+M(8cM+4d)ρ. Choose ρ=min⁡{ℓ, 14AM, 164cM}, interpreting a term with zero denominator as +∞. The two nonlinear error terms are at most M/8 each. The remaining terms satisfy MBρ2/2≤MBr2/8≤M/32 and 4Mdρ≤2Mdr≤M/8, because ℓ≤r/2. Their sum is 13M/32<M/2. Thus ∫Bρ(z0)e^≥π2Mρ2.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1givencasesalgebra∎

If ρ<ℓ, one of the nonlinear terms determines the minimum, so Mρ2 equals 1/(16A) or 1/(4096c2), or their common minimum when both are present. In all cases Mρ2≥1/H. Step 3.1 would give 2E≥π/(2H), contradicting E<π/(8H). Therefore ρ=ℓ. Step 3.1 then gives Mℓ2≤4E/π, and the center comparison in step 2.1 proves e(0,0)≤16E/(πr2). If both nonlinear coefficients vanish, the minimum defining ρ is already ℓ; the same argument applies. The proof never uses a normal derivative at the curved edge, where the maximizing weight vanishes.

Remarks

The earlier bibliography named Dusa McDuff and Dietmar Salamon, J-holomorphic Curves and Symplectic Topology, mean value inequalities (https://bookstore.ams.org/coll-52). That cited book edition was not available in this review; no reading of it is asserted. The current reference records the actually read geometric context, while the complete scalar/local differential proof above supplies the stated assertion.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources