How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The integral transform is representative independent
Statement
For every , , the integral defining is absolutely convergent for every and unchanged by null-set modifications. Moreover .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integrable complex representative and , with the formula of Fourier transform on complex L1 classes.
The exponential satisfies for real (, , and ).
Integrable functions equal almost everywhere have equal integrals on every measurable set (Two integrable functions are equal almost everywhere exactly when all of their indefinite integrals agree).
The modulus of an integral is at most the integral of the modulus (The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus).
Proof
The exponential factor is continuous, hence measurable, and has modulus one. Thus the product is measurable and . Its componentwise integral exists, and .
If outside a measurable null set , the same modulus equality proves the product with integrable, and the two products agree outside . Applying integral invariance on gives identical values at this . Since was arbitrary, this holds at every frequency; no union of frequency-dependent exceptional sets is taken. In particular a zero class has identically zero transform.