Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

M2 Protected Block Index Comparison

Physical scope

Pure mathematical conditional statement/example; no physical membrane realization asserted.

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. A grading on a Hilbert space is an orthogonal decomposition H=H+⊕H−, equivalently the eigenspace decomposition of a self-adjoint unitary involution Γ with Γ∣H+=I and Γ∣H−=−I. An odd operator preserves its domain under Γ and satisfies RΓ=−ΓR there; an even operator commutes with Γ on its domain. An even orthogonal splitting H=HP⊕HH is one in which both summands are graded subspaces. A possibly unbounded operator is Fredholm here when it is Fredholm as a bounded map from its graph-norm domain to its Hilbert target. For an odd Fredholm operator R, its even-to-odd block is R+:dom⁡(R)∩H+→H−, with cokernel H−/ran⁡R+, and ind⁡(R+):=dim⁡ker⁡R+−dim⁡coker⁡R+. Let H=HP⊕HH be a graded Hilbert space with an even orthogonal splitting, and let

Q=(ABB∗D)

be odd and self-adjoint on dom⁡(A)⊕dom⁡(D). Assume A and D are odd self-adjoint operators, B:HH→HP is bounded and odd, and D:dom⁡(D)→HH is bijective with everywhere-defined bounded inverse D−1:HH→HH and range dom⁡(D). Suppose either (i) HP=L2(C,E) for a compact smooth curve C without boundary and a finite-rank graded Hermitian bundle E→C, with fixed smooth Riemannian metric and positive density on C. Here A is the H1(C,E) realization of a classical order-one pseudodifferential operator: locally it is a finite sum of cutoff Fourier quantizations of smooth matrix symbols a(x,ξ) with ∣∂xα∂ξβa∣≤Cαβ(1+∣ξ∣2)(1−∣β∣)/2, admitting homogeneous expansions of degrees 1,0,−1,…: after subtracting the first N terms with a smooth cutoff near ξ=0, the remainder satisfies the same estimates with 1 replaced by 1−N. Smooth-kernel operators are also allowed. Its leading symbol a1(x,ξ) is invertible for every real ξ≠0; A is self-adjoint and odd on the stated domain. Alternatively, (ii) HP is finite-dimensional. In case (ii), A is self-adjoint on all of HP. Then S:=A−BD−1B∗ is self-adjoint and Fredholm on dom⁡(A), and its even-to-odd Fredholm index equals that of A. The operator Q has the same index. Its kernel is parity-preservingly isomorphic to ker⁡S by u⟼(u,−D−1B∗u). All Hilbert spaces, domains, blocks, and operator hypotheses are mathematical inputs. This gives no physical membrane realization, vacuum-rank conclusion, or singular uniform-gap conclusion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC; the graded Hilbert spaces and operators in the statement. Give operator domains their graph norms; in case (i), identify HP with L2(C,E) and dom⁡(A) with H1(C,E).

[F1]

The Axiom of Choice: use the full Axiom of Choice as the foundational convention for the cited Sobolev and elliptic interfaces.

[F2]

Finite-chart symbol calculus and equivariant Fredholm realizations: a first-order elliptic member of the classical class Ψ1 defined by the local quantizations in the Statement has Fredholm Sobolev realizations and the stated local elliptic regularity.

[F3]

Compactness of W1,p(Ω)↪Lp(Ω) on bounded extension domains: the inclusion W1,2↪L2 is compact on bounded extension domains; a finite chart and partition argument gives the compact inclusion H1(C,E)↪L2(C,E).

[F4]

Atkinson: a bounded operator between Banach spaces is Fredholm exactly when it has a bounded two-sided inverse modulo compact operators.

[F5]

Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace: each closed subspace of a Hilbert space has an orthogonal complement and the space is their direct sum.

[F6]

Bounded inverse theorem: a bounded bijection between Banach spaces has bounded inverse.

[F7]

Smooth partitions of unity exist on manifolds: compact manifolds admit smooth partitions subordinate to finite coordinate covers.

[F8]

AC implies DC implies countable choice: in ZF, AC⇒DC⇒ACω. This supplies the weaker choice hypotheses of [F5]–[F7].

Proof

1.1F1F2F6givenalgebra

Write X=dom⁡(A) with its graph norm and Y=HP. In case (i), the compact boundaryless manifold hypothesis and [F2], under full AC [F1], apply to the explicitly specified A∈Ψ1(C;E,E) and make A:H1(C,E)→L2(C,E) Fredholm. Its Sobolev norm and graph norm are equivalent: the graph norm is bounded by the Sobolev norm by [F2], and the identity between these two Banach domains has bounded inverse by [F6]. In case (ii), density of dom⁡(A) and finite dimensionality give dom⁡(A)=HP; hence A is a map between finite-dimensional spaces and is Fredholm.

1.2F3F7F8givenalgebra

In case (i), the finite-chart Sobolev identification and partition [F7] reduce the inclusion H1(C,E)↪L2(C,E) to finitely many bounded smooth extension domains. Rellich compactness [F3] on each chart, combined over the finite cover, makes X↪Y compact. In case (ii), this inclusion has finite-dimensional target and is compact. The use of the weaker Countable/Dependent Choice hypotheses in [F3, F7] is supplied by [F8].

1.3givenalgebra

Put K:=BD−1B∗. Since D=D∗ has a bounded everywhere-defined inverse, (D−1)∗=D−1. Thus K∗=K. Each of B,D−1,B∗ reverses grading, so their product K reverses grading. A bounded self-adjoint perturbation of A is self-adjoint on dom⁡(A): the adjoint-domain identity (A−K)∗=A∗−K∗ follows by moving the bounded term across the Hilbert pairing. Therefore S=A−K is odd and self-adjoint on the stated domain.

2.1givenstep 1.2algebra

The operator K:=BD−1B∗:Y→Y is bounded by the hypotheses. Its restriction X→Y is compact as the composition of the compact inclusion X↪Y from step 1.2 with K.

3.1F4step 1.1step 2.1

For every t∈[0,1], A−tK:X→Y is a compact perturbation of the Fredholm operator A. Atkinson's theorem [F4] implies that each A−tK is Fredholm. Its odd block decomposition is a direct sum of the two chiral maps, so each chiral map is Fredholm as well.

4.1F5F6step 3.1algebra

The index is locally constant along this norm-continuous path. To verify this, fix a Fredholm map L:X→Y, put N=ker⁡L, R=ran⁡L, and choose the orthogonal splittings X=N⊕X1 and Y=R⊕R⊥ by [F5]. The restriction L:X1→R is a bounded bijection; [F6] gives a bounded inverse. For every sufficiently small perturbation E:X→Y, the X1→R block G of L+E remains invertible by the Neumann series. In the decompositions above, write L+E=(EC,NEC,X1ER,NG),C:=R⊥. Bounded invertible row and column operations reduce this block matrix to diag⁡(F,G), where F=EC,N−EC,X1G−1ER,N:N→C. The finite-dimensional map F has index dim⁡N−dim⁡C, independent of its rank, and G has index zero. Thus ind⁡(L+E)=dim⁡N−dim⁡C=ind⁡L near L. Applying this argument on the Hilbert spaces X+ and Y− to L=(A−tK)+, connectedness of [0,1] gives ind⁡S+=ind⁡A+.

4.2givenstep 1.3step 3.1algebra

On XQ:=dom⁡(A)⊕dom⁡(D), let Q0=A⊕D and CB=(0BB∗0), so Q=Q0+CB with CB bounded on HP⊕HH. For every x∈XQ,

∥Qx∥≤∥Q0x∥+∥CB∥∥x∥,∥Q0x∥≤∥Qx∥+∥CB∥∥x∥.

Consequently the graph norms, for x=(xP,xH), ∥x∥Q=(∥x∥2+∥Qx∥2)1/2 and ∥x∥Q0=(∥x∥2+∥AxP∥2+∥DxH∥2)1/2 are equivalent. Thus the identity identifies the graph domain used to define the Fredholm index of Q with the direct-sum graph domain. Define the even triangular map T=(I0D−1B∗I). The map D−1B∗:HP→dom⁡(D) is bounded for the graph norm because ∥D−1B∗x∥+∥D(D−1B∗x)∥≤(∥D−1∥+1)∥B∗∥∥x∥. Thus T and T−1=(I0−D−1B∗I) are bounded inverses on XQ with its direct-sum graph norm, and hence on the equivalent Q graph norm. Direct block multiplication gives Q=T∗(S00D)T. Since S=A−K with bounded K, the graph norm of S is equivalent to that of A. The outer maps are therefore bounded even isomorphisms on the graph domain and Hilbert target. Right composition by T identifies kernels, and left composition by T∗ identifies ranges and cokernels; both preserve parity. The block-diagonal index is the sum of the two block indices. Since D is invertible, its chiral index is zero, and ind⁡Q+=ind⁡S+.

5.1givenstep 4.2algebra∎

If u∈ker⁡S, direct substitution gives Q(u,−D−1B∗u)=(Su,0)=0. Conversely, if Q(u,v)=0, its second block equation and invertibility of D force v=−D−1B∗u, and its first equation then gives Su=0. The two assignments are inverse. The product D−1B∗ is even, so the isomorphism preserves parity. For an odd self-adjoint Fredholm operator, the even-to-odd index is dim⁡ker⁡Q∣H+−dim⁡ker⁡Q∣H−, because the cokernel of its even-to-odd block is the kernel of its odd-to-even adjoint block. The parity-preserving kernel isomorphism therefore gives the claimed kernel comparison as well.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources