Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-ancilla complete positivity of countable Kraus maps

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let H be a complex Hilbert space (Hilbert space), let (Ma)a≥1 be bounded operators on H with ∑a≤NMa∗Ma→I strongly, and let Φ(ρ)=∑aMaρMa∗ be the map of Countable Kraus normalization and trace-norm convergence. Here a map on trace-class operators is completely positive on finite-dimensional ancillas when, for every finite-dimensional complex inner product space C, its matrixwise amplification IC⊗Φ preserves self-adjoint positive trace-class operators on C⊗^H. Then for every finite-dimensional complex inner product space C the amplification

IC⊗Φ:S1(C⊗^H)→S1(C⊗^H)

is well defined by the trace-norm convergent series ∑a(IC⊗Ma)R(IC⊗Ma∗) and preserves positivity: every self-adjoint positive trace-class R (positivity in the sense of Self-adjoint, positive, unitary and normal operators) has IC⊗Φ(R) self-adjoint positive. Hence Φ is completely positive on every finite-dimensional ancilla in the stated sense.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: H, (Ma) and Φ as in the Statement; a finite-dimensional complex inner product space C; a positive trace-class R on C⊗^H.

[F1]

The completed tensor product C⊗^H with the inner product ⟨c⊗h,c′⊗h′⟩=⟨c,c′⟩⟨h,h′⟩ is a complex Hilbert space with dense span of elementary tensors; for bounded S the amplification IC⊗S is bounded with ∥IC⊗S∥≤∥S∥ (Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases, Bounded tensor maps: extension, norm estimate, adjoint and commutation).

[F2]

For every R≥0 in S1 and every bounded V, VRV∗≥0 and tr⁡(VRV∗)=tr⁡(V∗VR); the trace-class operators are complete in trace norm (Nuclear bounded cyclicity for trace-class operators, Trace class is a two sided Banach operator ideal, Trace class operator).

[F3]

A positive trace-class operator R on a Hilbert space has a spectral expansion R=∑nwnTξn,ξn with orthonormal ξn, wn≥0 and ∑nwn=tr⁡R (Density operators and scalar spectral probability).

[F4]

The partial sums SN=∑a≤NMa∗Ma satisfy 0≤SN≤I and converge strongly to I. For finite-dimensional C with orthonormal basis (ek)k=1d, every vector in C⊗^H has the form ξ=∑kek⊗hk, so IC⊗SN acts coordinatewise, is a positive contraction, and converges strongly to I (Bounded tensor maps: extension, norm estimate, adjoint and commutation, Hilbert tensor construction: inner product, completion and product bases).

Proof

1.1givenF1F4algebra

[The amplified family is strongly complete] For each a, (IC⊗Ma)∗(IC⊗Ma)=IC⊗Ma∗Ma by [F1]. If (ek)k=1d is an orthonormal basis of C and ξ=∑kek⊗hk, then ∥(IC⊗∑a≤NMa∗Ma−I)ξ∥2=∑k=1d∥(SN−I)hk∥2⟶0 by the assumed strong convergence on H. Thus the amplified family satisfies the hypothesis of Countable Kraus normalization and trace-norm convergence on C⊗^H, and that lemma applies to it.

2.1step 1.1F1F2F3algebra∎

[Positivity] If C={0} or H={0}, then C⊗^H={0}, the only trace-class input is R=0, and the asserted series and its limit are zero, so the conclusion holds. Suppose henceforth that C,H≠{0}. For R≥0 and each a, (IC⊗Ma)R(IC⊗Ma)∗≥0 by [F2]; the partial sums are positive, and the trace-norm limit is positive because ⟨Sx,x⟩=lim⁡⟨SNx,x⟩≥0 for trace-norm convergent SN→S. Alternatively, applying the spectral argument of Countable Kraus normalization and trace-norm convergence to the amplified family: by [F3], R=∑nwnTξn,ξn with ξn∈C⊗^H, the partial sums ∑a≤N(IC⊗Ma)R(IC⊗Ma)∗=∑nwn∑a≤NT(IC⊗Ma)ξn,(IC⊗Ma)ξn are positive with traces ∑nwn∑a≤N∥(IC⊗Ma)ξn∥2↑∑nwn∥ξn∥2=tr⁡R by step 1.1, so they converge in trace norm to a positive limit with trace tr⁡R, and the series converges to IC⊗Φ(R).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources